Cargando…

The value of using the faecal immunochemical test in general practice on patients presenting with non-alarm symptoms of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Around 50% of individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) initially present with non-alarm symptoms. METHODS: We investigated the value of using the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) in the diagnostic process of CRC and other serious bowel disease in individuals presenting with non-alarm sym...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Juul, Jakob Søgaard, Hornung, Nete, Andersen, Berit, Laurberg, Søren, Olesen, Frede, Vedsted, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30065255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0178-7
_version_ 1783354590247256064
author Juul, Jakob Søgaard
Hornung, Nete
Andersen, Berit
Laurberg, Søren
Olesen, Frede
Vedsted, Peter
author_facet Juul, Jakob Søgaard
Hornung, Nete
Andersen, Berit
Laurberg, Søren
Olesen, Frede
Vedsted, Peter
author_sort Juul, Jakob Søgaard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Around 50% of individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) initially present with non-alarm symptoms. METHODS: We investigated the value of using the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) in the diagnostic process of CRC and other serious bowel disease in individuals presenting with non-alarm symptoms in general practice. The study was conducted in the Central Denmark Region from 1 September 2015 to 30 August 2016. The FIT was used as a rule-in test on patients aged ≥30 years with non-alarm symptoms of CRC. The cut-off value was set to 10 µg Hb/g faeces. RESULTS: A total of 3462 valid FITs were performed. Of these, 540 (15.6%) were positive. Three months after FIT performance, 51 (PPV: 9.4% (95% CI: 7.0;11.9)) individuals with a positive FIT were diagnosed with CRC and 73 (PPV: 13.5% (95%CI: 10.6;16.4)) with other serious bowel disease. Of CRCs, 66.7% were diagnosed in UICC stage I & II and 19.6% in stage IV. The false negative rate for CRC was <0.1% for the initial 3 months after FIT performance. CONCLUSION: The FIT may be used as a supplementary diagnostic test in the diagnostic process of CRC and other serious bowel disease in individuals with non-alarm symptoms of CRC in general practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6133998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61339982019-09-04 The value of using the faecal immunochemical test in general practice on patients presenting with non-alarm symptoms of colorectal cancer Juul, Jakob Søgaard Hornung, Nete Andersen, Berit Laurberg, Søren Olesen, Frede Vedsted, Peter Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: Around 50% of individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) initially present with non-alarm symptoms. METHODS: We investigated the value of using the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) in the diagnostic process of CRC and other serious bowel disease in individuals presenting with non-alarm symptoms in general practice. The study was conducted in the Central Denmark Region from 1 September 2015 to 30 August 2016. The FIT was used as a rule-in test on patients aged ≥30 years with non-alarm symptoms of CRC. The cut-off value was set to 10 µg Hb/g faeces. RESULTS: A total of 3462 valid FITs were performed. Of these, 540 (15.6%) were positive. Three months after FIT performance, 51 (PPV: 9.4% (95% CI: 7.0;11.9)) individuals with a positive FIT were diagnosed with CRC and 73 (PPV: 13.5% (95%CI: 10.6;16.4)) with other serious bowel disease. Of CRCs, 66.7% were diagnosed in UICC stage I & II and 19.6% in stage IV. The false negative rate for CRC was <0.1% for the initial 3 months after FIT performance. CONCLUSION: The FIT may be used as a supplementary diagnostic test in the diagnostic process of CRC and other serious bowel disease in individuals with non-alarm symptoms of CRC in general practice. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-08-01 2018-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6133998/ /pubmed/30065255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0178-7 Text en © Cancer Research UK 2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Note: This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
spellingShingle Article
Juul, Jakob Søgaard
Hornung, Nete
Andersen, Berit
Laurberg, Søren
Olesen, Frede
Vedsted, Peter
The value of using the faecal immunochemical test in general practice on patients presenting with non-alarm symptoms of colorectal cancer
title The value of using the faecal immunochemical test in general practice on patients presenting with non-alarm symptoms of colorectal cancer
title_full The value of using the faecal immunochemical test in general practice on patients presenting with non-alarm symptoms of colorectal cancer
title_fullStr The value of using the faecal immunochemical test in general practice on patients presenting with non-alarm symptoms of colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed The value of using the faecal immunochemical test in general practice on patients presenting with non-alarm symptoms of colorectal cancer
title_short The value of using the faecal immunochemical test in general practice on patients presenting with non-alarm symptoms of colorectal cancer
title_sort value of using the faecal immunochemical test in general practice on patients presenting with non-alarm symptoms of colorectal cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30065255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0178-7
work_keys_str_mv AT juuljakobsøgaard thevalueofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestingeneralpracticeonpatientspresentingwithnonalarmsymptomsofcolorectalcancer
AT hornungnete thevalueofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestingeneralpracticeonpatientspresentingwithnonalarmsymptomsofcolorectalcancer
AT andersenberit thevalueofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestingeneralpracticeonpatientspresentingwithnonalarmsymptomsofcolorectalcancer
AT laurbergsøren thevalueofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestingeneralpracticeonpatientspresentingwithnonalarmsymptomsofcolorectalcancer
AT olesenfrede thevalueofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestingeneralpracticeonpatientspresentingwithnonalarmsymptomsofcolorectalcancer
AT vedstedpeter thevalueofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestingeneralpracticeonpatientspresentingwithnonalarmsymptomsofcolorectalcancer
AT juuljakobsøgaard valueofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestingeneralpracticeonpatientspresentingwithnonalarmsymptomsofcolorectalcancer
AT hornungnete valueofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestingeneralpracticeonpatientspresentingwithnonalarmsymptomsofcolorectalcancer
AT andersenberit valueofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestingeneralpracticeonpatientspresentingwithnonalarmsymptomsofcolorectalcancer
AT laurbergsøren valueofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestingeneralpracticeonpatientspresentingwithnonalarmsymptomsofcolorectalcancer
AT olesenfrede valueofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestingeneralpracticeonpatientspresentingwithnonalarmsymptomsofcolorectalcancer
AT vedstedpeter valueofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestingeneralpracticeonpatientspresentingwithnonalarmsymptomsofcolorectalcancer