Cargando…
The value of using the faecal immunochemical test in general practice on patients presenting with non-alarm symptoms of colorectal cancer
BACKGROUND: Around 50% of individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) initially present with non-alarm symptoms. METHODS: We investigated the value of using the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) in the diagnostic process of CRC and other serious bowel disease in individuals presenting with non-alarm sym...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30065255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0178-7 |
_version_ | 1783354590247256064 |
---|---|
author | Juul, Jakob Søgaard Hornung, Nete Andersen, Berit Laurberg, Søren Olesen, Frede Vedsted, Peter |
author_facet | Juul, Jakob Søgaard Hornung, Nete Andersen, Berit Laurberg, Søren Olesen, Frede Vedsted, Peter |
author_sort | Juul, Jakob Søgaard |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Around 50% of individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) initially present with non-alarm symptoms. METHODS: We investigated the value of using the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) in the diagnostic process of CRC and other serious bowel disease in individuals presenting with non-alarm symptoms in general practice. The study was conducted in the Central Denmark Region from 1 September 2015 to 30 August 2016. The FIT was used as a rule-in test on patients aged ≥30 years with non-alarm symptoms of CRC. The cut-off value was set to 10 µg Hb/g faeces. RESULTS: A total of 3462 valid FITs were performed. Of these, 540 (15.6%) were positive. Three months after FIT performance, 51 (PPV: 9.4% (95% CI: 7.0;11.9)) individuals with a positive FIT were diagnosed with CRC and 73 (PPV: 13.5% (95%CI: 10.6;16.4)) with other serious bowel disease. Of CRCs, 66.7% were diagnosed in UICC stage I & II and 19.6% in stage IV. The false negative rate for CRC was <0.1% for the initial 3 months after FIT performance. CONCLUSION: The FIT may be used as a supplementary diagnostic test in the diagnostic process of CRC and other serious bowel disease in individuals with non-alarm symptoms of CRC in general practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6133998 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61339982019-09-04 The value of using the faecal immunochemical test in general practice on patients presenting with non-alarm symptoms of colorectal cancer Juul, Jakob Søgaard Hornung, Nete Andersen, Berit Laurberg, Søren Olesen, Frede Vedsted, Peter Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: Around 50% of individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) initially present with non-alarm symptoms. METHODS: We investigated the value of using the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) in the diagnostic process of CRC and other serious bowel disease in individuals presenting with non-alarm symptoms in general practice. The study was conducted in the Central Denmark Region from 1 September 2015 to 30 August 2016. The FIT was used as a rule-in test on patients aged ≥30 years with non-alarm symptoms of CRC. The cut-off value was set to 10 µg Hb/g faeces. RESULTS: A total of 3462 valid FITs were performed. Of these, 540 (15.6%) were positive. Three months after FIT performance, 51 (PPV: 9.4% (95% CI: 7.0;11.9)) individuals with a positive FIT were diagnosed with CRC and 73 (PPV: 13.5% (95%CI: 10.6;16.4)) with other serious bowel disease. Of CRCs, 66.7% were diagnosed in UICC stage I & II and 19.6% in stage IV. The false negative rate for CRC was <0.1% for the initial 3 months after FIT performance. CONCLUSION: The FIT may be used as a supplementary diagnostic test in the diagnostic process of CRC and other serious bowel disease in individuals with non-alarm symptoms of CRC in general practice. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-08-01 2018-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6133998/ /pubmed/30065255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0178-7 Text en © Cancer Research UK 2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Note: This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). |
spellingShingle | Article Juul, Jakob Søgaard Hornung, Nete Andersen, Berit Laurberg, Søren Olesen, Frede Vedsted, Peter The value of using the faecal immunochemical test in general practice on patients presenting with non-alarm symptoms of colorectal cancer |
title | The value of using the faecal immunochemical test in general
practice on patients presenting with non-alarm symptoms of colorectal
cancer |
title_full | The value of using the faecal immunochemical test in general
practice on patients presenting with non-alarm symptoms of colorectal
cancer |
title_fullStr | The value of using the faecal immunochemical test in general
practice on patients presenting with non-alarm symptoms of colorectal
cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | The value of using the faecal immunochemical test in general
practice on patients presenting with non-alarm symptoms of colorectal
cancer |
title_short | The value of using the faecal immunochemical test in general
practice on patients presenting with non-alarm symptoms of colorectal
cancer |
title_sort | value of using the faecal immunochemical test in general
practice on patients presenting with non-alarm symptoms of colorectal
cancer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30065255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0178-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT juuljakobsøgaard thevalueofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestingeneralpracticeonpatientspresentingwithnonalarmsymptomsofcolorectalcancer AT hornungnete thevalueofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestingeneralpracticeonpatientspresentingwithnonalarmsymptomsofcolorectalcancer AT andersenberit thevalueofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestingeneralpracticeonpatientspresentingwithnonalarmsymptomsofcolorectalcancer AT laurbergsøren thevalueofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestingeneralpracticeonpatientspresentingwithnonalarmsymptomsofcolorectalcancer AT olesenfrede thevalueofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestingeneralpracticeonpatientspresentingwithnonalarmsymptomsofcolorectalcancer AT vedstedpeter thevalueofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestingeneralpracticeonpatientspresentingwithnonalarmsymptomsofcolorectalcancer AT juuljakobsøgaard valueofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestingeneralpracticeonpatientspresentingwithnonalarmsymptomsofcolorectalcancer AT hornungnete valueofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestingeneralpracticeonpatientspresentingwithnonalarmsymptomsofcolorectalcancer AT andersenberit valueofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestingeneralpracticeonpatientspresentingwithnonalarmsymptomsofcolorectalcancer AT laurbergsøren valueofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestingeneralpracticeonpatientspresentingwithnonalarmsymptomsofcolorectalcancer AT olesenfrede valueofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestingeneralpracticeonpatientspresentingwithnonalarmsymptomsofcolorectalcancer AT vedstedpeter valueofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestingeneralpracticeonpatientspresentingwithnonalarmsymptomsofcolorectalcancer |