Cargando…

Is intracranial volume a suitable proxy for brain reserve?

Brain reserve is a concept introduced to explain why Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients with a greater brain volume prior to onset of pathology generally have better clinical outcomes. In this review, we provide a historical background of the emergence of brain reserve and discuss several aspects tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Loenhoud, Anna Catharina, Groot, Colin, Vogel, Jacob William, van der Flier, Wiesje Maria, Ossenkoppele, Rik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6134772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30205838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-018-0408-5
_version_ 1783354725757878272
author van Loenhoud, Anna Catharina
Groot, Colin
Vogel, Jacob William
van der Flier, Wiesje Maria
Ossenkoppele, Rik
author_facet van Loenhoud, Anna Catharina
Groot, Colin
Vogel, Jacob William
van der Flier, Wiesje Maria
Ossenkoppele, Rik
author_sort van Loenhoud, Anna Catharina
collection PubMed
description Brain reserve is a concept introduced to explain why Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients with a greater brain volume prior to onset of pathology generally have better clinical outcomes. In this review, we provide a historical background of the emergence of brain reserve and discuss several aspects that need further clarification, including the dynamic or static nature of the concept and its underlying mechanisms and clinical effect. We then describe how brain reserve has been operationalized over the years, and critically evaluate the use of intracranial volume (ICV) as the most widely used proxy for brain reserve. Furthermore, we perform a meta-analysis showing that ICV is associated with higher cognitive performance after adjusting for the presence and amount of pathology. Although we acknowledge its imperfections, we conclude that the use of ICV as a proxy for brain reserve is currently warranted. However, further development of more optimal measures of brain reserve as well as a more clearly defined theoretical framework is essential.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6134772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61347722018-09-15 Is intracranial volume a suitable proxy for brain reserve? van Loenhoud, Anna Catharina Groot, Colin Vogel, Jacob William van der Flier, Wiesje Maria Ossenkoppele, Rik Alzheimers Res Ther Review Brain reserve is a concept introduced to explain why Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients with a greater brain volume prior to onset of pathology generally have better clinical outcomes. In this review, we provide a historical background of the emergence of brain reserve and discuss several aspects that need further clarification, including the dynamic or static nature of the concept and its underlying mechanisms and clinical effect. We then describe how brain reserve has been operationalized over the years, and critically evaluate the use of intracranial volume (ICV) as the most widely used proxy for brain reserve. Furthermore, we perform a meta-analysis showing that ICV is associated with higher cognitive performance after adjusting for the presence and amount of pathology. Although we acknowledge its imperfections, we conclude that the use of ICV as a proxy for brain reserve is currently warranted. However, further development of more optimal measures of brain reserve as well as a more clearly defined theoretical framework is essential. BioMed Central 2018-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6134772/ /pubmed/30205838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-018-0408-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
van Loenhoud, Anna Catharina
Groot, Colin
Vogel, Jacob William
van der Flier, Wiesje Maria
Ossenkoppele, Rik
Is intracranial volume a suitable proxy for brain reserve?
title Is intracranial volume a suitable proxy for brain reserve?
title_full Is intracranial volume a suitable proxy for brain reserve?
title_fullStr Is intracranial volume a suitable proxy for brain reserve?
title_full_unstemmed Is intracranial volume a suitable proxy for brain reserve?
title_short Is intracranial volume a suitable proxy for brain reserve?
title_sort is intracranial volume a suitable proxy for brain reserve?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6134772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30205838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-018-0408-5
work_keys_str_mv AT vanloenhoudannacatharina isintracranialvolumeasuitableproxyforbrainreserve
AT grootcolin isintracranialvolumeasuitableproxyforbrainreserve
AT vogeljacobwilliam isintracranialvolumeasuitableproxyforbrainreserve
AT vanderflierwiesjemaria isintracranialvolumeasuitableproxyforbrainreserve
AT ossenkoppelerik isintracranialvolumeasuitableproxyforbrainreserve