Cargando…
Is intracranial volume a suitable proxy for brain reserve?
Brain reserve is a concept introduced to explain why Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients with a greater brain volume prior to onset of pathology generally have better clinical outcomes. In this review, we provide a historical background of the emergence of brain reserve and discuss several aspects tha...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6134772/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30205838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-018-0408-5 |
_version_ | 1783354725757878272 |
---|---|
author | van Loenhoud, Anna Catharina Groot, Colin Vogel, Jacob William van der Flier, Wiesje Maria Ossenkoppele, Rik |
author_facet | van Loenhoud, Anna Catharina Groot, Colin Vogel, Jacob William van der Flier, Wiesje Maria Ossenkoppele, Rik |
author_sort | van Loenhoud, Anna Catharina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Brain reserve is a concept introduced to explain why Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients with a greater brain volume prior to onset of pathology generally have better clinical outcomes. In this review, we provide a historical background of the emergence of brain reserve and discuss several aspects that need further clarification, including the dynamic or static nature of the concept and its underlying mechanisms and clinical effect. We then describe how brain reserve has been operationalized over the years, and critically evaluate the use of intracranial volume (ICV) as the most widely used proxy for brain reserve. Furthermore, we perform a meta-analysis showing that ICV is associated with higher cognitive performance after adjusting for the presence and amount of pathology. Although we acknowledge its imperfections, we conclude that the use of ICV as a proxy for brain reserve is currently warranted. However, further development of more optimal measures of brain reserve as well as a more clearly defined theoretical framework is essential. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6134772 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61347722018-09-15 Is intracranial volume a suitable proxy for brain reserve? van Loenhoud, Anna Catharina Groot, Colin Vogel, Jacob William van der Flier, Wiesje Maria Ossenkoppele, Rik Alzheimers Res Ther Review Brain reserve is a concept introduced to explain why Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients with a greater brain volume prior to onset of pathology generally have better clinical outcomes. In this review, we provide a historical background of the emergence of brain reserve and discuss several aspects that need further clarification, including the dynamic or static nature of the concept and its underlying mechanisms and clinical effect. We then describe how brain reserve has been operationalized over the years, and critically evaluate the use of intracranial volume (ICV) as the most widely used proxy for brain reserve. Furthermore, we perform a meta-analysis showing that ICV is associated with higher cognitive performance after adjusting for the presence and amount of pathology. Although we acknowledge its imperfections, we conclude that the use of ICV as a proxy for brain reserve is currently warranted. However, further development of more optimal measures of brain reserve as well as a more clearly defined theoretical framework is essential. BioMed Central 2018-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6134772/ /pubmed/30205838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-018-0408-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review van Loenhoud, Anna Catharina Groot, Colin Vogel, Jacob William van der Flier, Wiesje Maria Ossenkoppele, Rik Is intracranial volume a suitable proxy for brain reserve? |
title | Is intracranial volume a suitable proxy for brain reserve? |
title_full | Is intracranial volume a suitable proxy for brain reserve? |
title_fullStr | Is intracranial volume a suitable proxy for brain reserve? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is intracranial volume a suitable proxy for brain reserve? |
title_short | Is intracranial volume a suitable proxy for brain reserve? |
title_sort | is intracranial volume a suitable proxy for brain reserve? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6134772/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30205838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-018-0408-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanloenhoudannacatharina isintracranialvolumeasuitableproxyforbrainreserve AT grootcolin isintracranialvolumeasuitableproxyforbrainreserve AT vogeljacobwilliam isintracranialvolumeasuitableproxyforbrainreserve AT vanderflierwiesjemaria isintracranialvolumeasuitableproxyforbrainreserve AT ossenkoppelerik isintracranialvolumeasuitableproxyforbrainreserve |