Cargando…

Comparison of 11C-choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and Conventional Imaging for Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer

We aimed to compare (11)C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with conventional imaging, including pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast-enhanced chest, abdomen, and pelvic computed tomography (CT), and bone scintigraphy, for prostate cancer restaging. Thirt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kawanaka, Yusuke, Kitajima, Kazuhiro, Yamamoto, Shingo, Nakanishi, Yukako, Yamada, Yusuke, Hashimoto, Takahiko, Suzuki, Toru, Go, Shuken, Kanematsu, Akihiro, Nojima, Michio, Sofue, Keitaro, Trsurusaki, Masakatsu, Tamaki, Yukihisa, Yoshida, Rika, Yamakado, Koichiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6135306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210954
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2966
_version_ 1783354800202579968
author Kawanaka, Yusuke
Kitajima, Kazuhiro
Yamamoto, Shingo
Nakanishi, Yukako
Yamada, Yusuke
Hashimoto, Takahiko
Suzuki, Toru
Go, Shuken
Kanematsu, Akihiro
Nojima, Michio
Sofue, Keitaro
Trsurusaki, Masakatsu
Tamaki, Yukihisa
Yoshida, Rika
Yamakado, Koichiro
author_facet Kawanaka, Yusuke
Kitajima, Kazuhiro
Yamamoto, Shingo
Nakanishi, Yukako
Yamada, Yusuke
Hashimoto, Takahiko
Suzuki, Toru
Go, Shuken
Kanematsu, Akihiro
Nojima, Michio
Sofue, Keitaro
Trsurusaki, Masakatsu
Tamaki, Yukihisa
Yoshida, Rika
Yamakado, Koichiro
author_sort Kawanaka, Yusuke
collection PubMed
description We aimed to compare (11)C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with conventional imaging, including pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast-enhanced chest, abdomen, and pelvic computed tomography (CT), and bone scintigraphy, for prostate cancer restaging. Thirty patients (median prostate-specific antigen [PSA: 11.8 ng/mL]) with suspected recurrent prostate cancer following definitive treatment underwent (11)C-choline PET/CT and conventional imaging, including pelvic MRI, contrast-enhanced chest, abdomen, and pelvic CT, and bone scintigraphy. The results were compared with regard to patient- and lesion-based diagnostic performance for local recurrence, and for lymph node and bony metastases using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and McNemar’s test. Documented local recurrence and node and bony metastases were present in 11 (36.7%), 10 (33.3%), and 17 (56.7%) cases, respectively, of the enrolled patients. Patient-based sensitivity / specificity / accuracy / area under the ROC curve for (11)C-choline-PET/CT for diagnosing local recurrence were 90.9% / 94.7% / 93.3% / 0.975 and for conventional imaging were 90.9% / 100% / 96.7% / 1.0. Those who underwent (11)C-choline-PET/CT for node metastasis were 90.0% / 95.0% / 93.3% / 0.925 and for conventional imaging were 70.0% / 95.0% / 86.7% / 0.905. Those who underwent (11)C-choline-PET/CT for bone metastasis were 94.1% / 92.3% / 93.3% / 0.991 and who underwent conventional imaging were 94.1% / 84.6% / 90.0% / 0.982. No significant differences were observed among them. The lesion-based detection rate of (11)C-choline PET/CT for local recurrences and node and bone metastases as compared to conventional imaging was 92.9% (13/14) vs. 92.9% (13/14); 87.1% (27/31) vs. 54.8% (17/31); and 96.9% (219/226) vs. 90.3% (204/226) respectively, with significant differences noted for detection of node and bone lesions (p=0.0044 and p=0.00030, respectively). (11)C-choline-PET/CT is more accurate in the detection of recurrent prostate cancer nodes and bony metastatic lesions compared to conventional imaging and has the advantage of restaging the disease in a single step.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6135306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61353062018-09-12 Comparison of 11C-choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and Conventional Imaging for Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer Kawanaka, Yusuke Kitajima, Kazuhiro Yamamoto, Shingo Nakanishi, Yukako Yamada, Yusuke Hashimoto, Takahiko Suzuki, Toru Go, Shuken Kanematsu, Akihiro Nojima, Michio Sofue, Keitaro Trsurusaki, Masakatsu Tamaki, Yukihisa Yoshida, Rika Yamakado, Koichiro Cureus Radiology We aimed to compare (11)C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with conventional imaging, including pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast-enhanced chest, abdomen, and pelvic computed tomography (CT), and bone scintigraphy, for prostate cancer restaging. Thirty patients (median prostate-specific antigen [PSA: 11.8 ng/mL]) with suspected recurrent prostate cancer following definitive treatment underwent (11)C-choline PET/CT and conventional imaging, including pelvic MRI, contrast-enhanced chest, abdomen, and pelvic CT, and bone scintigraphy. The results were compared with regard to patient- and lesion-based diagnostic performance for local recurrence, and for lymph node and bony metastases using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and McNemar’s test. Documented local recurrence and node and bony metastases were present in 11 (36.7%), 10 (33.3%), and 17 (56.7%) cases, respectively, of the enrolled patients. Patient-based sensitivity / specificity / accuracy / area under the ROC curve for (11)C-choline-PET/CT for diagnosing local recurrence were 90.9% / 94.7% / 93.3% / 0.975 and for conventional imaging were 90.9% / 100% / 96.7% / 1.0. Those who underwent (11)C-choline-PET/CT for node metastasis were 90.0% / 95.0% / 93.3% / 0.925 and for conventional imaging were 70.0% / 95.0% / 86.7% / 0.905. Those who underwent (11)C-choline-PET/CT for bone metastasis were 94.1% / 92.3% / 93.3% / 0.991 and who underwent conventional imaging were 94.1% / 84.6% / 90.0% / 0.982. No significant differences were observed among them. The lesion-based detection rate of (11)C-choline PET/CT for local recurrences and node and bone metastases as compared to conventional imaging was 92.9% (13/14) vs. 92.9% (13/14); 87.1% (27/31) vs. 54.8% (17/31); and 96.9% (219/226) vs. 90.3% (204/226) respectively, with significant differences noted for detection of node and bone lesions (p=0.0044 and p=0.00030, respectively). (11)C-choline-PET/CT is more accurate in the detection of recurrent prostate cancer nodes and bony metastatic lesions compared to conventional imaging and has the advantage of restaging the disease in a single step. Cureus 2018-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6135306/ /pubmed/30210954 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2966 Text en Copyright © 2018, Kawanaka et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Radiology
Kawanaka, Yusuke
Kitajima, Kazuhiro
Yamamoto, Shingo
Nakanishi, Yukako
Yamada, Yusuke
Hashimoto, Takahiko
Suzuki, Toru
Go, Shuken
Kanematsu, Akihiro
Nojima, Michio
Sofue, Keitaro
Trsurusaki, Masakatsu
Tamaki, Yukihisa
Yoshida, Rika
Yamakado, Koichiro
Comparison of 11C-choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and Conventional Imaging for Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer
title Comparison of 11C-choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and Conventional Imaging for Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer
title_full Comparison of 11C-choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and Conventional Imaging for Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of 11C-choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and Conventional Imaging for Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of 11C-choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and Conventional Imaging for Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer
title_short Comparison of 11C-choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and Conventional Imaging for Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer
title_sort comparison of 11c-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (pet/ct) and conventional imaging for detection of recurrent prostate cancer
topic Radiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6135306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210954
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2966
work_keys_str_mv AT kawanakayusuke comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer
AT kitajimakazuhiro comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer
AT yamamotoshingo comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer
AT nakanishiyukako comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer
AT yamadayusuke comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer
AT hashimototakahiko comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer
AT suzukitoru comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer
AT goshuken comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer
AT kanematsuakihiro comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer
AT nojimamichio comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer
AT sofuekeitaro comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer
AT trsurusakimasakatsu comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer
AT tamakiyukihisa comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer
AT yoshidarika comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer
AT yamakadokoichiro comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer