Cargando…
Comparison of 11C-choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and Conventional Imaging for Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer
We aimed to compare (11)C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with conventional imaging, including pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast-enhanced chest, abdomen, and pelvic computed tomography (CT), and bone scintigraphy, for prostate cancer restaging. Thirt...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6135306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210954 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2966 |
_version_ | 1783354800202579968 |
---|---|
author | Kawanaka, Yusuke Kitajima, Kazuhiro Yamamoto, Shingo Nakanishi, Yukako Yamada, Yusuke Hashimoto, Takahiko Suzuki, Toru Go, Shuken Kanematsu, Akihiro Nojima, Michio Sofue, Keitaro Trsurusaki, Masakatsu Tamaki, Yukihisa Yoshida, Rika Yamakado, Koichiro |
author_facet | Kawanaka, Yusuke Kitajima, Kazuhiro Yamamoto, Shingo Nakanishi, Yukako Yamada, Yusuke Hashimoto, Takahiko Suzuki, Toru Go, Shuken Kanematsu, Akihiro Nojima, Michio Sofue, Keitaro Trsurusaki, Masakatsu Tamaki, Yukihisa Yoshida, Rika Yamakado, Koichiro |
author_sort | Kawanaka, Yusuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | We aimed to compare (11)C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with conventional imaging, including pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast-enhanced chest, abdomen, and pelvic computed tomography (CT), and bone scintigraphy, for prostate cancer restaging. Thirty patients (median prostate-specific antigen [PSA: 11.8 ng/mL]) with suspected recurrent prostate cancer following definitive treatment underwent (11)C-choline PET/CT and conventional imaging, including pelvic MRI, contrast-enhanced chest, abdomen, and pelvic CT, and bone scintigraphy. The results were compared with regard to patient- and lesion-based diagnostic performance for local recurrence, and for lymph node and bony metastases using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and McNemar’s test. Documented local recurrence and node and bony metastases were present in 11 (36.7%), 10 (33.3%), and 17 (56.7%) cases, respectively, of the enrolled patients. Patient-based sensitivity / specificity / accuracy / area under the ROC curve for (11)C-choline-PET/CT for diagnosing local recurrence were 90.9% / 94.7% / 93.3% / 0.975 and for conventional imaging were 90.9% / 100% / 96.7% / 1.0. Those who underwent (11)C-choline-PET/CT for node metastasis were 90.0% / 95.0% / 93.3% / 0.925 and for conventional imaging were 70.0% / 95.0% / 86.7% / 0.905. Those who underwent (11)C-choline-PET/CT for bone metastasis were 94.1% / 92.3% / 93.3% / 0.991 and who underwent conventional imaging were 94.1% / 84.6% / 90.0% / 0.982. No significant differences were observed among them. The lesion-based detection rate of (11)C-choline PET/CT for local recurrences and node and bone metastases as compared to conventional imaging was 92.9% (13/14) vs. 92.9% (13/14); 87.1% (27/31) vs. 54.8% (17/31); and 96.9% (219/226) vs. 90.3% (204/226) respectively, with significant differences noted for detection of node and bone lesions (p=0.0044 and p=0.00030, respectively). (11)C-choline-PET/CT is more accurate in the detection of recurrent prostate cancer nodes and bony metastatic lesions compared to conventional imaging and has the advantage of restaging the disease in a single step. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6135306 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61353062018-09-12 Comparison of 11C-choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and Conventional Imaging for Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer Kawanaka, Yusuke Kitajima, Kazuhiro Yamamoto, Shingo Nakanishi, Yukako Yamada, Yusuke Hashimoto, Takahiko Suzuki, Toru Go, Shuken Kanematsu, Akihiro Nojima, Michio Sofue, Keitaro Trsurusaki, Masakatsu Tamaki, Yukihisa Yoshida, Rika Yamakado, Koichiro Cureus Radiology We aimed to compare (11)C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with conventional imaging, including pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast-enhanced chest, abdomen, and pelvic computed tomography (CT), and bone scintigraphy, for prostate cancer restaging. Thirty patients (median prostate-specific antigen [PSA: 11.8 ng/mL]) with suspected recurrent prostate cancer following definitive treatment underwent (11)C-choline PET/CT and conventional imaging, including pelvic MRI, contrast-enhanced chest, abdomen, and pelvic CT, and bone scintigraphy. The results were compared with regard to patient- and lesion-based diagnostic performance for local recurrence, and for lymph node and bony metastases using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and McNemar’s test. Documented local recurrence and node and bony metastases were present in 11 (36.7%), 10 (33.3%), and 17 (56.7%) cases, respectively, of the enrolled patients. Patient-based sensitivity / specificity / accuracy / area under the ROC curve for (11)C-choline-PET/CT for diagnosing local recurrence were 90.9% / 94.7% / 93.3% / 0.975 and for conventional imaging were 90.9% / 100% / 96.7% / 1.0. Those who underwent (11)C-choline-PET/CT for node metastasis were 90.0% / 95.0% / 93.3% / 0.925 and for conventional imaging were 70.0% / 95.0% / 86.7% / 0.905. Those who underwent (11)C-choline-PET/CT for bone metastasis were 94.1% / 92.3% / 93.3% / 0.991 and who underwent conventional imaging were 94.1% / 84.6% / 90.0% / 0.982. No significant differences were observed among them. The lesion-based detection rate of (11)C-choline PET/CT for local recurrences and node and bone metastases as compared to conventional imaging was 92.9% (13/14) vs. 92.9% (13/14); 87.1% (27/31) vs. 54.8% (17/31); and 96.9% (219/226) vs. 90.3% (204/226) respectively, with significant differences noted for detection of node and bone lesions (p=0.0044 and p=0.00030, respectively). (11)C-choline-PET/CT is more accurate in the detection of recurrent prostate cancer nodes and bony metastatic lesions compared to conventional imaging and has the advantage of restaging the disease in a single step. Cureus 2018-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6135306/ /pubmed/30210954 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2966 Text en Copyright © 2018, Kawanaka et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Radiology Kawanaka, Yusuke Kitajima, Kazuhiro Yamamoto, Shingo Nakanishi, Yukako Yamada, Yusuke Hashimoto, Takahiko Suzuki, Toru Go, Shuken Kanematsu, Akihiro Nojima, Michio Sofue, Keitaro Trsurusaki, Masakatsu Tamaki, Yukihisa Yoshida, Rika Yamakado, Koichiro Comparison of 11C-choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and Conventional Imaging for Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer |
title | Comparison of 11C-choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and Conventional Imaging for Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer |
title_full | Comparison of 11C-choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and Conventional Imaging for Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer |
title_fullStr | Comparison of 11C-choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and Conventional Imaging for Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of 11C-choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and Conventional Imaging for Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer |
title_short | Comparison of 11C-choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and Conventional Imaging for Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer |
title_sort | comparison of 11c-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (pet/ct) and conventional imaging for detection of recurrent prostate cancer |
topic | Radiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6135306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210954 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2966 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kawanakayusuke comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer AT kitajimakazuhiro comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer AT yamamotoshingo comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer AT nakanishiyukako comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer AT yamadayusuke comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer AT hashimototakahiko comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer AT suzukitoru comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer AT goshuken comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer AT kanematsuakihiro comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer AT nojimamichio comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer AT sofuekeitaro comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer AT trsurusakimasakatsu comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer AT tamakiyukihisa comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer AT yoshidarika comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer AT yamakadokoichiro comparisonof11ccholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctandconventionalimagingfordetectionofrecurrentprostatecancer |