Cargando…

Outcomes of early NIH-funded investigators: Experience of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

Survival of junior scientists in academic biomedical research is difficult in today’s highly competitive funding climate. National Institute of Health (NIH) data on first-time R01 grantees indicate the rate at which early investigators drop out from a NIH-supported research career is most rapid 4 to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haggerty, Patricia A., Fenton, Matthew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6135352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30208016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199648
_version_ 1783354802637373440
author Haggerty, Patricia A.
Fenton, Matthew J.
author_facet Haggerty, Patricia A.
Fenton, Matthew J.
author_sort Haggerty, Patricia A.
collection PubMed
description Survival of junior scientists in academic biomedical research is difficult in today’s highly competitive funding climate. National Institute of Health (NIH) data on first-time R01 grantees indicate the rate at which early investigators drop out from a NIH-supported research career is most rapid 4 to 5 years from the first R01 award. The factors associated with a high risk of dropping out, and whether these factors impact all junior investigators equally, are unclear. We identified a cohort of 1,496 investigators who received their first R01-equivalent (R01-e) awards from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases between 2003 and 2010, and studied all their subsequent NIH grant applications through 2016. Ultimately, 57% of the cohort were successful in obtaining new R01-e funding, despite highly competitive conditions. Among those investigators who failed to compete successfully for new funding (43%), the average time to dropping out was 5 years. Investigators who successfully obtained new grants showed remarkable within-person consistency across multiple grant submission behaviors, including submitting more applications per year, more renewal applications, and more applications to multiple NIH Institutes. Funded investigators appeared to have two advantages over their unfunded peers at the outset: they had better scores on their first R01-e grants and they demonstrated an early ability to write applications that would be scored, not triaged. The cohort rapidly segregated into two very different groups on the basis of PI consistency in the quality and frequency of applications submitted after their first R01-e award. Lastly, we identified a number of specific demographic factors, intitutional characteristics, and grant submission behaviors that were associated with successful outcomes, and assessed their predictive value and relative importance for the likelihood of obtaining additional NIH funding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6135352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61353522018-09-27 Outcomes of early NIH-funded investigators: Experience of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Haggerty, Patricia A. Fenton, Matthew J. PLoS One Research Article Survival of junior scientists in academic biomedical research is difficult in today’s highly competitive funding climate. National Institute of Health (NIH) data on first-time R01 grantees indicate the rate at which early investigators drop out from a NIH-supported research career is most rapid 4 to 5 years from the first R01 award. The factors associated with a high risk of dropping out, and whether these factors impact all junior investigators equally, are unclear. We identified a cohort of 1,496 investigators who received their first R01-equivalent (R01-e) awards from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases between 2003 and 2010, and studied all their subsequent NIH grant applications through 2016. Ultimately, 57% of the cohort were successful in obtaining new R01-e funding, despite highly competitive conditions. Among those investigators who failed to compete successfully for new funding (43%), the average time to dropping out was 5 years. Investigators who successfully obtained new grants showed remarkable within-person consistency across multiple grant submission behaviors, including submitting more applications per year, more renewal applications, and more applications to multiple NIH Institutes. Funded investigators appeared to have two advantages over their unfunded peers at the outset: they had better scores on their first R01-e grants and they demonstrated an early ability to write applications that would be scored, not triaged. The cohort rapidly segregated into two very different groups on the basis of PI consistency in the quality and frequency of applications submitted after their first R01-e award. Lastly, we identified a number of specific demographic factors, intitutional characteristics, and grant submission behaviors that were associated with successful outcomes, and assessed their predictive value and relative importance for the likelihood of obtaining additional NIH funding. Public Library of Science 2018-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6135352/ /pubmed/30208016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199648 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Haggerty, Patricia A.
Fenton, Matthew J.
Outcomes of early NIH-funded investigators: Experience of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
title Outcomes of early NIH-funded investigators: Experience of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
title_full Outcomes of early NIH-funded investigators: Experience of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
title_fullStr Outcomes of early NIH-funded investigators: Experience of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of early NIH-funded investigators: Experience of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
title_short Outcomes of early NIH-funded investigators: Experience of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
title_sort outcomes of early nih-funded investigators: experience of the national institute of allergy and infectious diseases
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6135352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30208016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199648
work_keys_str_mv AT haggertypatriciaa outcomesofearlynihfundedinvestigatorsexperienceofthenationalinstituteofallergyandinfectiousdiseases
AT fentonmatthewj outcomesofearlynihfundedinvestigatorsexperienceofthenationalinstituteofallergyandinfectiousdiseases