Cargando…

Selective use of pericardial window and drainage as sole treatment for hemopericardium from penetrating chest trauma

BACKGROUND: Penetrating cardiac injuries (PCIs) are highly lethal, and a sternotomy is considered mandatory for suspected PCI. Recent literature suggests pericardial window (PCW) may be sufficient for superficial cardiac injuries to drain hemopericardium and assess for continued bleeding and instabi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chestovich, Paul J, McNicoll, Christopher F, Fraser, Douglas R, Patel, Purvi P, Kuhls, Deborah A, Clark, Esmeralda, Fildes, John J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6135421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30234166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2018-000187
_version_ 1783354819404103680
author Chestovich, Paul J
McNicoll, Christopher F
Fraser, Douglas R
Patel, Purvi P
Kuhls, Deborah A
Clark, Esmeralda
Fildes, John J
author_facet Chestovich, Paul J
McNicoll, Christopher F
Fraser, Douglas R
Patel, Purvi P
Kuhls, Deborah A
Clark, Esmeralda
Fildes, John J
author_sort Chestovich, Paul J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Penetrating cardiac injuries (PCIs) are highly lethal, and a sternotomy is considered mandatory for suspected PCI. Recent literature suggests pericardial window (PCW) may be sufficient for superficial cardiac injuries to drain hemopericardium and assess for continued bleeding and instability. This study objective is to review patients with PCI managed with sternotomy and PCW and compare outcomes. METHODS: All patients with penetrating chest trauma from 2000 to 2016 requiring PCW or sternotomy were reviewed. Data were collected for patients who had PCW for hemopericardium managed with only pericardial drain, or underwent sternotomy for cardiac injuries grade 1–3 according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Cardiac Organ Injury Scale (OIS). The PCW+drain group was compared with the Sternotomy group using Fisher’s exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum test with P<0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Sternotomy was performed in 57 patients for suspected PCI, including 7 with AAST OIS grade 1–3 injuries (Sternotomy group). Four patients had pericardial injuries, three had partial thickness cardiac injuries, two of which were suture-repaired. Average blood drained was 285 mL (100–500 mL). PCW was performed in 37 patients, and 21 had hemopericardium; 16 patients proceeded to sternotomy and 5 were treated with pericardial drainage (PCW+drain group). All PCW+drain patients had suction evacuation of hemopericardium, pericardial lavage, and verified bleeding cessation, followed by pericardial drain placement and admission to intensive care unit (ICU). Average blood drained was 240 mL (40–600 mL), and pericardial drains were removed on postoperative day 3.6 (2–5). There was no significant difference in demographics, injury mechanism, Revised Trauma Score exploratory laparotomies, hospital or ICU length of stay, or ventilator days. No in-hospital mortality occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating chest trauma and hemopericardium may be safely managed with PCW, lavage and drainage with documented cessation of bleeding, and postoperative ICU monitoring. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6135421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61354212018-09-19 Selective use of pericardial window and drainage as sole treatment for hemopericardium from penetrating chest trauma Chestovich, Paul J McNicoll, Christopher F Fraser, Douglas R Patel, Purvi P Kuhls, Deborah A Clark, Esmeralda Fildes, John J Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Penetrating cardiac injuries (PCIs) are highly lethal, and a sternotomy is considered mandatory for suspected PCI. Recent literature suggests pericardial window (PCW) may be sufficient for superficial cardiac injuries to drain hemopericardium and assess for continued bleeding and instability. This study objective is to review patients with PCI managed with sternotomy and PCW and compare outcomes. METHODS: All patients with penetrating chest trauma from 2000 to 2016 requiring PCW or sternotomy were reviewed. Data were collected for patients who had PCW for hemopericardium managed with only pericardial drain, or underwent sternotomy for cardiac injuries grade 1–3 according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Cardiac Organ Injury Scale (OIS). The PCW+drain group was compared with the Sternotomy group using Fisher’s exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum test with P<0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Sternotomy was performed in 57 patients for suspected PCI, including 7 with AAST OIS grade 1–3 injuries (Sternotomy group). Four patients had pericardial injuries, three had partial thickness cardiac injuries, two of which were suture-repaired. Average blood drained was 285 mL (100–500 mL). PCW was performed in 37 patients, and 21 had hemopericardium; 16 patients proceeded to sternotomy and 5 were treated with pericardial drainage (PCW+drain group). All PCW+drain patients had suction evacuation of hemopericardium, pericardial lavage, and verified bleeding cessation, followed by pericardial drain placement and admission to intensive care unit (ICU). Average blood drained was 240 mL (40–600 mL), and pericardial drains were removed on postoperative day 3.6 (2–5). There was no significant difference in demographics, injury mechanism, Revised Trauma Score exploratory laparotomies, hospital or ICU length of stay, or ventilator days. No in-hospital mortality occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating chest trauma and hemopericardium may be safely managed with PCW, lavage and drainage with documented cessation of bleeding, and postoperative ICU monitoring. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6135421/ /pubmed/30234166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2018-000187 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Chestovich, Paul J
McNicoll, Christopher F
Fraser, Douglas R
Patel, Purvi P
Kuhls, Deborah A
Clark, Esmeralda
Fildes, John J
Selective use of pericardial window and drainage as sole treatment for hemopericardium from penetrating chest trauma
title Selective use of pericardial window and drainage as sole treatment for hemopericardium from penetrating chest trauma
title_full Selective use of pericardial window and drainage as sole treatment for hemopericardium from penetrating chest trauma
title_fullStr Selective use of pericardial window and drainage as sole treatment for hemopericardium from penetrating chest trauma
title_full_unstemmed Selective use of pericardial window and drainage as sole treatment for hemopericardium from penetrating chest trauma
title_short Selective use of pericardial window and drainage as sole treatment for hemopericardium from penetrating chest trauma
title_sort selective use of pericardial window and drainage as sole treatment for hemopericardium from penetrating chest trauma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6135421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30234166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2018-000187
work_keys_str_mv AT chestovichpaulj selectiveuseofpericardialwindowanddrainageassoletreatmentforhemopericardiumfrompenetratingchesttrauma
AT mcnicollchristopherf selectiveuseofpericardialwindowanddrainageassoletreatmentforhemopericardiumfrompenetratingchesttrauma
AT fraserdouglasr selectiveuseofpericardialwindowanddrainageassoletreatmentforhemopericardiumfrompenetratingchesttrauma
AT patelpurvip selectiveuseofpericardialwindowanddrainageassoletreatmentforhemopericardiumfrompenetratingchesttrauma
AT kuhlsdeboraha selectiveuseofpericardialwindowanddrainageassoletreatmentforhemopericardiumfrompenetratingchesttrauma
AT clarkesmeralda selectiveuseofpericardialwindowanddrainageassoletreatmentforhemopericardiumfrompenetratingchesttrauma
AT fildesjohnj selectiveuseofpericardialwindowanddrainageassoletreatmentforhemopericardiumfrompenetratingchesttrauma