Inconsistencies undermine the conclusion that agriculture is a dominant source of NO(x) in California

Almaraz et al. reported that agricultural soils are a dominant source of NO(x) pollution in California (20 to 32% of total statewide NO(x) emissions). However, this conclusion may be undermined by the lack of agreement between their modeled estimates and previously reported empirical measurements, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maaz, Tai McClellan, Waldo, Sarah, Bruulsema, Tom, Mikkelsen, Rob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Association for the Advancement of Science 2018
Materias:
Technical Comments
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6135542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30214935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat4706
_version_ 1783354843738406912
author Maaz, Tai McClellan
Waldo, Sarah
Bruulsema, Tom
Mikkelsen, Rob
author_facet Maaz, Tai McClellan
Waldo, Sarah
Bruulsema, Tom
Mikkelsen, Rob
author_sort Maaz, Tai McClellan
collection PubMed
description Almaraz et al. reported that agricultural soils are a dominant source of NO(x) pollution in California (20 to 32% of total statewide NO(x) emissions). However, this conclusion may be undermined by the lack of agreement between their modeled estimates and previously reported empirical measurements, the extrapolation of NO(x) fluxes during hot moments to derive annual estimates, and the overestimation of nitrogen fertilizer consumption in California.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6135542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Association for the Advancement of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61355422018-09-13 Inconsistencies undermine the conclusion that agriculture is a dominant source of NO(x) in California Maaz, Tai McClellan Waldo, Sarah Bruulsema, Tom Mikkelsen, Rob Sci Adv Technical Comments Almaraz et al. reported that agricultural soils are a dominant source of NO(x) pollution in California (20 to 32% of total statewide NO(x) emissions). However, this conclusion may be undermined by the lack of agreement between their modeled estimates and previously reported empirical measurements, the extrapolation of NO(x) fluxes during hot moments to derive annual estimates, and the overestimation of nitrogen fertilizer consumption in California. American Association for the Advancement of Science 2018-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6135542/ /pubmed/30214935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat4706 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Comments
Maaz, Tai McClellan
Waldo, Sarah
Bruulsema, Tom
Mikkelsen, Rob
Inconsistencies undermine the conclusion that agriculture is a dominant source of NO(x) in California
title Inconsistencies undermine the conclusion that agriculture is a dominant source of NO(x) in California
title_full Inconsistencies undermine the conclusion that agriculture is a dominant source of NO(x) in California
title_fullStr Inconsistencies undermine the conclusion that agriculture is a dominant source of NO(x) in California
title_full_unstemmed Inconsistencies undermine the conclusion that agriculture is a dominant source of NO(x) in California
title_short Inconsistencies undermine the conclusion that agriculture is a dominant source of NO(x) in California
title_sort inconsistencies undermine the conclusion that agriculture is a dominant source of no(x) in california
topic Technical Comments
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6135542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30214935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat4706
work_keys_str_mv AT maaztaimcclellan inconsistenciesunderminetheconclusionthatagricultureisadominantsourceofnoxincalifornia
AT waldosarah inconsistenciesunderminetheconclusionthatagricultureisadominantsourceofnoxincalifornia
AT bruulsematom inconsistenciesunderminetheconclusionthatagricultureisadominantsourceofnoxincalifornia
AT mikkelsenrob inconsistenciesunderminetheconclusionthatagricultureisadominantsourceofnoxincalifornia

Ejemplares similares