Cargando…
Extrapolation of point measurements and fertilizer-only emission factors cannot capture statewide soil NO(x) emissions
Maaz et al. argue that inconsistencies across scales of observation undermine our working hypothesis that soil NO(x) emissions have been substantially overlooked in California; however, the core issues they raise are already discussed in our manuscript. We agree that point measurements cannot be rel...
Autores principales: | Almaraz, Maya, Bai, Edith, Wang, Chao, Trousdell, Justin, Conley, Stephen, Faloona, Ian, Houlton, Benjamin Z. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Association for the Advancement of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6135546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30214941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau7373 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Agriculture is a major source of NO(x) pollution in California
por: Almaraz, Maya, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
On the financial viability of negative emissions
por: Bednar, Johannes, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Monitoring global carbon emissions in 2021
por: Liu, Zhu, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Monitoring global carbon emissions in 2022
por: Liu, Zhu, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Comment on “Climate legacies drive global soil carbon stocks in terrestrial ecosystems”
por: Sanderman, Jonathan
Publicado: (2018)