Cargando…
Cross-contamination in canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet diets
BACKGROUND: Adverse food reactions (AFRs) are defined as abnormal responses to an ingested food or food additive. Diagnosis and treatment of AFRs consist of the complete elimination of these ingredients in the dietary trial. Previous studies have demonstrated the presence of undeclared ingredients i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6136174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30208880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1571-4 |
_version_ | 1783354946482077696 |
---|---|
author | Pagani, Elena Soto del Rio, Maria de los Dolores Dalmasso, Alessandra Bottero, Maria Teresa Schiavone, Achille Prola, Liviana |
author_facet | Pagani, Elena Soto del Rio, Maria de los Dolores Dalmasso, Alessandra Bottero, Maria Teresa Schiavone, Achille Prola, Liviana |
author_sort | Pagani, Elena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Adverse food reactions (AFRs) are defined as abnormal responses to an ingested food or food additive. Diagnosis and treatment of AFRs consist of the complete elimination of these ingredients in the dietary trial. Previous studies have demonstrated the presence of undeclared ingredients in commercial limited-antigen dry food diets that can compromise the results and efficacy of dietary elimination trails. The aim of this study was to assess a selection of commercial canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet foods for the potential cross-contamination of animal proteins from origins not mentioned on the label. RESULTS: Eleven canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet foods (9 novel animal protein foods, 1 vegetarian and 1 hydrolyzed) were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect the presence DNA of animal and vegetal origins. PCR analysis confirmed the contamination of 6 of the 11 (54.5%) limited-antigen wet diets with undeclared animal protein. One of these 6 diets was solely composed of animal protein sources completely unrelated to those declared on the label. None of the foods containing horse meat or fish were contaminated, and neither were the vegetarian or the hydrolyzed food products. Moreover, the results show that had zoological class primers only been used to check for cross-class contaminations, as are generally used in the pet food industry for in-house checks, the apparent contamination rate would have been significantly underestimated: less than 20% (3/11), instead of the actual rate of 54.7% using species-specific primers. CONCLUSION: This study reveals a high rate of cross-contamination in dietetic limited-antigen wet canine and feline foods, as previously described for dietetic dry limited-antigen foods (reported to be more than 80%). These results add new fuel to the discussion about the potential causes underlying the failure of elimination diets, since animal protein contaminants may actually be present in the commercial dietetic limited-antigen diets. AFRs may therefore occur as a result of inadequate practices in the pet food industry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6136174 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61361742018-09-15 Cross-contamination in canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet diets Pagani, Elena Soto del Rio, Maria de los Dolores Dalmasso, Alessandra Bottero, Maria Teresa Schiavone, Achille Prola, Liviana BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Adverse food reactions (AFRs) are defined as abnormal responses to an ingested food or food additive. Diagnosis and treatment of AFRs consist of the complete elimination of these ingredients in the dietary trial. Previous studies have demonstrated the presence of undeclared ingredients in commercial limited-antigen dry food diets that can compromise the results and efficacy of dietary elimination trails. The aim of this study was to assess a selection of commercial canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet foods for the potential cross-contamination of animal proteins from origins not mentioned on the label. RESULTS: Eleven canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet foods (9 novel animal protein foods, 1 vegetarian and 1 hydrolyzed) were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect the presence DNA of animal and vegetal origins. PCR analysis confirmed the contamination of 6 of the 11 (54.5%) limited-antigen wet diets with undeclared animal protein. One of these 6 diets was solely composed of animal protein sources completely unrelated to those declared on the label. None of the foods containing horse meat or fish were contaminated, and neither were the vegetarian or the hydrolyzed food products. Moreover, the results show that had zoological class primers only been used to check for cross-class contaminations, as are generally used in the pet food industry for in-house checks, the apparent contamination rate would have been significantly underestimated: less than 20% (3/11), instead of the actual rate of 54.7% using species-specific primers. CONCLUSION: This study reveals a high rate of cross-contamination in dietetic limited-antigen wet canine and feline foods, as previously described for dietetic dry limited-antigen foods (reported to be more than 80%). These results add new fuel to the discussion about the potential causes underlying the failure of elimination diets, since animal protein contaminants may actually be present in the commercial dietetic limited-antigen diets. AFRs may therefore occur as a result of inadequate practices in the pet food industry. BioMed Central 2018-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6136174/ /pubmed/30208880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1571-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pagani, Elena Soto del Rio, Maria de los Dolores Dalmasso, Alessandra Bottero, Maria Teresa Schiavone, Achille Prola, Liviana Cross-contamination in canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet diets |
title | Cross-contamination in canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet diets |
title_full | Cross-contamination in canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet diets |
title_fullStr | Cross-contamination in canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet diets |
title_full_unstemmed | Cross-contamination in canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet diets |
title_short | Cross-contamination in canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet diets |
title_sort | cross-contamination in canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet diets |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6136174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30208880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1571-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paganielena crosscontaminationincanineandfelinedieteticlimitedantigenwetdiets AT sotodelriomariadelosdolores crosscontaminationincanineandfelinedieteticlimitedantigenwetdiets AT dalmassoalessandra crosscontaminationincanineandfelinedieteticlimitedantigenwetdiets AT botteromariateresa crosscontaminationincanineandfelinedieteticlimitedantigenwetdiets AT schiavoneachille crosscontaminationincanineandfelinedieteticlimitedantigenwetdiets AT prolaliviana crosscontaminationincanineandfelinedieteticlimitedantigenwetdiets |