Cargando…

Cross-contamination in canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet diets

BACKGROUND: Adverse food reactions (AFRs) are defined as abnormal responses to an ingested food or food additive. Diagnosis and treatment of AFRs consist of the complete elimination of these ingredients in the dietary trial. Previous studies have demonstrated the presence of undeclared ingredients i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pagani, Elena, Soto del Rio, Maria de los Dolores, Dalmasso, Alessandra, Bottero, Maria Teresa, Schiavone, Achille, Prola, Liviana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6136174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30208880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1571-4
_version_ 1783354946482077696
author Pagani, Elena
Soto del Rio, Maria de los Dolores
Dalmasso, Alessandra
Bottero, Maria Teresa
Schiavone, Achille
Prola, Liviana
author_facet Pagani, Elena
Soto del Rio, Maria de los Dolores
Dalmasso, Alessandra
Bottero, Maria Teresa
Schiavone, Achille
Prola, Liviana
author_sort Pagani, Elena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adverse food reactions (AFRs) are defined as abnormal responses to an ingested food or food additive. Diagnosis and treatment of AFRs consist of the complete elimination of these ingredients in the dietary trial. Previous studies have demonstrated the presence of undeclared ingredients in commercial limited-antigen dry food diets that can compromise the results and efficacy of dietary elimination trails. The aim of this study was to assess a selection of commercial canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet foods for the potential cross-contamination of animal proteins from origins not mentioned on the label. RESULTS: Eleven canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet foods (9 novel animal protein foods, 1 vegetarian and 1 hydrolyzed) were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect the presence DNA of animal and vegetal origins. PCR analysis confirmed the contamination of 6 of the 11 (54.5%) limited-antigen wet diets with undeclared animal protein. One of these 6 diets was solely composed of animal protein sources completely unrelated to those declared on the label. None of the foods containing horse meat or fish were contaminated, and neither were the vegetarian or the hydrolyzed food products. Moreover, the results show that had zoological class primers only been used to check for cross-class contaminations, as are generally used in the pet food industry for in-house checks, the apparent contamination rate would have been significantly underestimated: less than 20% (3/11), instead of the actual rate of 54.7% using species-specific primers. CONCLUSION: This study reveals a high rate of cross-contamination in dietetic limited-antigen wet canine and feline foods, as previously described for dietetic dry limited-antigen foods (reported to be more than 80%). These results add new fuel to the discussion about the potential causes underlying the failure of elimination diets, since animal protein contaminants may actually be present in the commercial dietetic limited-antigen diets. AFRs may therefore occur as a result of inadequate practices in the pet food industry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6136174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61361742018-09-15 Cross-contamination in canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet diets Pagani, Elena Soto del Rio, Maria de los Dolores Dalmasso, Alessandra Bottero, Maria Teresa Schiavone, Achille Prola, Liviana BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Adverse food reactions (AFRs) are defined as abnormal responses to an ingested food or food additive. Diagnosis and treatment of AFRs consist of the complete elimination of these ingredients in the dietary trial. Previous studies have demonstrated the presence of undeclared ingredients in commercial limited-antigen dry food diets that can compromise the results and efficacy of dietary elimination trails. The aim of this study was to assess a selection of commercial canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet foods for the potential cross-contamination of animal proteins from origins not mentioned on the label. RESULTS: Eleven canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet foods (9 novel animal protein foods, 1 vegetarian and 1 hydrolyzed) were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect the presence DNA of animal and vegetal origins. PCR analysis confirmed the contamination of 6 of the 11 (54.5%) limited-antigen wet diets with undeclared animal protein. One of these 6 diets was solely composed of animal protein sources completely unrelated to those declared on the label. None of the foods containing horse meat or fish were contaminated, and neither were the vegetarian or the hydrolyzed food products. Moreover, the results show that had zoological class primers only been used to check for cross-class contaminations, as are generally used in the pet food industry for in-house checks, the apparent contamination rate would have been significantly underestimated: less than 20% (3/11), instead of the actual rate of 54.7% using species-specific primers. CONCLUSION: This study reveals a high rate of cross-contamination in dietetic limited-antigen wet canine and feline foods, as previously described for dietetic dry limited-antigen foods (reported to be more than 80%). These results add new fuel to the discussion about the potential causes underlying the failure of elimination diets, since animal protein contaminants may actually be present in the commercial dietetic limited-antigen diets. AFRs may therefore occur as a result of inadequate practices in the pet food industry. BioMed Central 2018-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6136174/ /pubmed/30208880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1571-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pagani, Elena
Soto del Rio, Maria de los Dolores
Dalmasso, Alessandra
Bottero, Maria Teresa
Schiavone, Achille
Prola, Liviana
Cross-contamination in canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet diets
title Cross-contamination in canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet diets
title_full Cross-contamination in canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet diets
title_fullStr Cross-contamination in canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet diets
title_full_unstemmed Cross-contamination in canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet diets
title_short Cross-contamination in canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet diets
title_sort cross-contamination in canine and feline dietetic limited-antigen wet diets
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6136174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30208880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1571-4
work_keys_str_mv AT paganielena crosscontaminationincanineandfelinedieteticlimitedantigenwetdiets
AT sotodelriomariadelosdolores crosscontaminationincanineandfelinedieteticlimitedantigenwetdiets
AT dalmassoalessandra crosscontaminationincanineandfelinedieteticlimitedantigenwetdiets
AT botteromariateresa crosscontaminationincanineandfelinedieteticlimitedantigenwetdiets
AT schiavoneachille crosscontaminationincanineandfelinedieteticlimitedantigenwetdiets
AT prolaliviana crosscontaminationincanineandfelinedieteticlimitedantigenwetdiets