Cargando…

Identifying and Resolving End of Session Cues in Substance Detection Canine Training

When training and working a substance detection canine, a trained final response should be performed immediately upon recognition of odor (Generally, a 1–3 s window is preferred within our detection practices). Typical canine training places much emphasis on planning and setting up training scenario...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Topoleski, Jan, Schultz, Craig A., Warren, Wynn G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6136301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30238008
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00206
_version_ 1783354969689161728
author Topoleski, Jan
Schultz, Craig A.
Warren, Wynn G.
author_facet Topoleski, Jan
Schultz, Craig A.
Warren, Wynn G.
author_sort Topoleski, Jan
collection PubMed
description When training and working a substance detection canine, a trained final response should be performed immediately upon recognition of odor (Generally, a 1–3 s window is preferred within our detection practices). Typical canine training places much emphasis on planning and setting up training scenarios to achieve specific objectives but not much consideration is given to how to end a training session. When the canine fails to maintain criteria, trainers are left trying to determine the cause of poor performance. One consideration often overlooked is a phenomenon called End of Session Cueing that may exist in detection training whereby a previously trained canine no longer responds to odor because it has taken on aversive association. This may be due to several factors associated with motivation. The sequence of events at the end of a session can be as equally important to maintain motivation for the task of scent detection in future sessions. This paper will identify and examine multiple factors associated with “End of Session Cues” in working dogs, how they may be responsible for poor final response performance and discuss potential strategies to address them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6136301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61363012018-09-20 Identifying and Resolving End of Session Cues in Substance Detection Canine Training Topoleski, Jan Schultz, Craig A. Warren, Wynn G. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science When training and working a substance detection canine, a trained final response should be performed immediately upon recognition of odor (Generally, a 1–3 s window is preferred within our detection practices). Typical canine training places much emphasis on planning and setting up training scenarios to achieve specific objectives but not much consideration is given to how to end a training session. When the canine fails to maintain criteria, trainers are left trying to determine the cause of poor performance. One consideration often overlooked is a phenomenon called End of Session Cueing that may exist in detection training whereby a previously trained canine no longer responds to odor because it has taken on aversive association. This may be due to several factors associated with motivation. The sequence of events at the end of a session can be as equally important to maintain motivation for the task of scent detection in future sessions. This paper will identify and examine multiple factors associated with “End of Session Cues” in working dogs, how they may be responsible for poor final response performance and discuss potential strategies to address them. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6136301/ /pubmed/30238008 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00206 Text en Copyright © 2018 Topoleski, Schultz and Warren. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Topoleski, Jan
Schultz, Craig A.
Warren, Wynn G.
Identifying and Resolving End of Session Cues in Substance Detection Canine Training
title Identifying and Resolving End of Session Cues in Substance Detection Canine Training
title_full Identifying and Resolving End of Session Cues in Substance Detection Canine Training
title_fullStr Identifying and Resolving End of Session Cues in Substance Detection Canine Training
title_full_unstemmed Identifying and Resolving End of Session Cues in Substance Detection Canine Training
title_short Identifying and Resolving End of Session Cues in Substance Detection Canine Training
title_sort identifying and resolving end of session cues in substance detection canine training
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6136301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30238008
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00206
work_keys_str_mv AT topoleskijan identifyingandresolvingendofsessioncuesinsubstancedetectioncaninetraining
AT schultzcraiga identifyingandresolvingendofsessioncuesinsubstancedetectioncaninetraining
AT warrenwynng identifyingandresolvingendofsessioncuesinsubstancedetectioncaninetraining