Cargando…
Identifying and Resolving End of Session Cues in Substance Detection Canine Training
When training and working a substance detection canine, a trained final response should be performed immediately upon recognition of odor (Generally, a 1–3 s window is preferred within our detection practices). Typical canine training places much emphasis on planning and setting up training scenario...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6136301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30238008 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00206 |
_version_ | 1783354969689161728 |
---|---|
author | Topoleski, Jan Schultz, Craig A. Warren, Wynn G. |
author_facet | Topoleski, Jan Schultz, Craig A. Warren, Wynn G. |
author_sort | Topoleski, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | When training and working a substance detection canine, a trained final response should be performed immediately upon recognition of odor (Generally, a 1–3 s window is preferred within our detection practices). Typical canine training places much emphasis on planning and setting up training scenarios to achieve specific objectives but not much consideration is given to how to end a training session. When the canine fails to maintain criteria, trainers are left trying to determine the cause of poor performance. One consideration often overlooked is a phenomenon called End of Session Cueing that may exist in detection training whereby a previously trained canine no longer responds to odor because it has taken on aversive association. This may be due to several factors associated with motivation. The sequence of events at the end of a session can be as equally important to maintain motivation for the task of scent detection in future sessions. This paper will identify and examine multiple factors associated with “End of Session Cues” in working dogs, how they may be responsible for poor final response performance and discuss potential strategies to address them. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6136301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61363012018-09-20 Identifying and Resolving End of Session Cues in Substance Detection Canine Training Topoleski, Jan Schultz, Craig A. Warren, Wynn G. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science When training and working a substance detection canine, a trained final response should be performed immediately upon recognition of odor (Generally, a 1–3 s window is preferred within our detection practices). Typical canine training places much emphasis on planning and setting up training scenarios to achieve specific objectives but not much consideration is given to how to end a training session. When the canine fails to maintain criteria, trainers are left trying to determine the cause of poor performance. One consideration often overlooked is a phenomenon called End of Session Cueing that may exist in detection training whereby a previously trained canine no longer responds to odor because it has taken on aversive association. This may be due to several factors associated with motivation. The sequence of events at the end of a session can be as equally important to maintain motivation for the task of scent detection in future sessions. This paper will identify and examine multiple factors associated with “End of Session Cues” in working dogs, how they may be responsible for poor final response performance and discuss potential strategies to address them. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6136301/ /pubmed/30238008 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00206 Text en Copyright © 2018 Topoleski, Schultz and Warren. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Veterinary Science Topoleski, Jan Schultz, Craig A. Warren, Wynn G. Identifying and Resolving End of Session Cues in Substance Detection Canine Training |
title | Identifying and Resolving End of Session Cues in Substance Detection Canine Training |
title_full | Identifying and Resolving End of Session Cues in Substance Detection Canine Training |
title_fullStr | Identifying and Resolving End of Session Cues in Substance Detection Canine Training |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying and Resolving End of Session Cues in Substance Detection Canine Training |
title_short | Identifying and Resolving End of Session Cues in Substance Detection Canine Training |
title_sort | identifying and resolving end of session cues in substance detection canine training |
topic | Veterinary Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6136301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30238008 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00206 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT topoleskijan identifyingandresolvingendofsessioncuesinsubstancedetectioncaninetraining AT schultzcraiga identifyingandresolvingendofsessioncuesinsubstancedetectioncaninetraining AT warrenwynng identifyingandresolvingendofsessioncuesinsubstancedetectioncaninetraining |