Cargando…

Effects of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features on mule deer harvest in Nebraska

Understanding the habitat use of wildlife species is important for effective management. Nebraska has a variety of habitat types, with the majority being covered by rangeland and cropland. These habitat types likely influence the harvest of mule deer (MD; Odocoileus hemionus) in Nebraska, but their...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Connor, Bryan J., Fryda, Nicolas J., Ranglack, Dustin H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6136395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30221086
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5510
_version_ 1783354992039559168
author O’Connor, Bryan J.
Fryda, Nicolas J.
Ranglack, Dustin H.
author_facet O’Connor, Bryan J.
Fryda, Nicolas J.
Ranglack, Dustin H.
author_sort O’Connor, Bryan J.
collection PubMed
description Understanding the habitat use of wildlife species is important for effective management. Nebraska has a variety of habitat types, with the majority being covered by rangeland and cropland. These habitat types likely influence the harvest of mule deer (MD; Odocoileus hemionus) in Nebraska, but their specific effects are unknown, and moreover, harvest may also be influenced by the accessibility of deer habitats for hunters. We modeled which environmental and anthropogenic landscape features influenced harvest densities. Spatial analysis in a Geographic Information System was used to determine the mean values of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features at the county level. We then used a generalized linear model to determine which of those factors influenced MD harvest from 2014–2016. We found that NDVI amplitude, hunter effort, road density, terrain roughness, and canopy cover influence MD harvest in Nebraska. According to our model, MD harvest densities are significantly greater areas with NDVI amplitude ∼38, increasing hunter effort, road densities near 1,750 m/km(2), increasing terrain roughness, and decreasing canopy cover. Understanding increased harvest densities of MD can be beneficial for wildlife managers, allowing for more efficient allocation of efforts and expenses by managers for population management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6136395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61363952018-09-14 Effects of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features on mule deer harvest in Nebraska O’Connor, Bryan J. Fryda, Nicolas J. Ranglack, Dustin H. PeerJ Coupled Natural and Human Systems Understanding the habitat use of wildlife species is important for effective management. Nebraska has a variety of habitat types, with the majority being covered by rangeland and cropland. These habitat types likely influence the harvest of mule deer (MD; Odocoileus hemionus) in Nebraska, but their specific effects are unknown, and moreover, harvest may also be influenced by the accessibility of deer habitats for hunters. We modeled which environmental and anthropogenic landscape features influenced harvest densities. Spatial analysis in a Geographic Information System was used to determine the mean values of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features at the county level. We then used a generalized linear model to determine which of those factors influenced MD harvest from 2014–2016. We found that NDVI amplitude, hunter effort, road density, terrain roughness, and canopy cover influence MD harvest in Nebraska. According to our model, MD harvest densities are significantly greater areas with NDVI amplitude ∼38, increasing hunter effort, road densities near 1,750 m/km(2), increasing terrain roughness, and decreasing canopy cover. Understanding increased harvest densities of MD can be beneficial for wildlife managers, allowing for more efficient allocation of efforts and expenses by managers for population management. PeerJ Inc. 2018-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6136395/ /pubmed/30221086 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5510 Text en ©2018 O’Connor et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Coupled Natural and Human Systems
O’Connor, Bryan J.
Fryda, Nicolas J.
Ranglack, Dustin H.
Effects of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features on mule deer harvest in Nebraska
title Effects of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features on mule deer harvest in Nebraska
title_full Effects of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features on mule deer harvest in Nebraska
title_fullStr Effects of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features on mule deer harvest in Nebraska
title_full_unstemmed Effects of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features on mule deer harvest in Nebraska
title_short Effects of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features on mule deer harvest in Nebraska
title_sort effects of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features on mule deer harvest in nebraska
topic Coupled Natural and Human Systems
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6136395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30221086
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5510
work_keys_str_mv AT oconnorbryanj effectsofenvironmentalandanthropogeniclandscapefeaturesonmuledeerharvestinnebraska
AT frydanicolasj effectsofenvironmentalandanthropogeniclandscapefeaturesonmuledeerharvestinnebraska
AT ranglackdustinh effectsofenvironmentalandanthropogeniclandscapefeaturesonmuledeerharvestinnebraska