Cargando…
Effects of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features on mule deer harvest in Nebraska
Understanding the habitat use of wildlife species is important for effective management. Nebraska has a variety of habitat types, with the majority being covered by rangeland and cropland. These habitat types likely influence the harvest of mule deer (MD; Odocoileus hemionus) in Nebraska, but their...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6136395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30221086 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5510 |
_version_ | 1783354992039559168 |
---|---|
author | O’Connor, Bryan J. Fryda, Nicolas J. Ranglack, Dustin H. |
author_facet | O’Connor, Bryan J. Fryda, Nicolas J. Ranglack, Dustin H. |
author_sort | O’Connor, Bryan J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Understanding the habitat use of wildlife species is important for effective management. Nebraska has a variety of habitat types, with the majority being covered by rangeland and cropland. These habitat types likely influence the harvest of mule deer (MD; Odocoileus hemionus) in Nebraska, but their specific effects are unknown, and moreover, harvest may also be influenced by the accessibility of deer habitats for hunters. We modeled which environmental and anthropogenic landscape features influenced harvest densities. Spatial analysis in a Geographic Information System was used to determine the mean values of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features at the county level. We then used a generalized linear model to determine which of those factors influenced MD harvest from 2014–2016. We found that NDVI amplitude, hunter effort, road density, terrain roughness, and canopy cover influence MD harvest in Nebraska. According to our model, MD harvest densities are significantly greater areas with NDVI amplitude ∼38, increasing hunter effort, road densities near 1,750 m/km(2), increasing terrain roughness, and decreasing canopy cover. Understanding increased harvest densities of MD can be beneficial for wildlife managers, allowing for more efficient allocation of efforts and expenses by managers for population management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6136395 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61363952018-09-14 Effects of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features on mule deer harvest in Nebraska O’Connor, Bryan J. Fryda, Nicolas J. Ranglack, Dustin H. PeerJ Coupled Natural and Human Systems Understanding the habitat use of wildlife species is important for effective management. Nebraska has a variety of habitat types, with the majority being covered by rangeland and cropland. These habitat types likely influence the harvest of mule deer (MD; Odocoileus hemionus) in Nebraska, but their specific effects are unknown, and moreover, harvest may also be influenced by the accessibility of deer habitats for hunters. We modeled which environmental and anthropogenic landscape features influenced harvest densities. Spatial analysis in a Geographic Information System was used to determine the mean values of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features at the county level. We then used a generalized linear model to determine which of those factors influenced MD harvest from 2014–2016. We found that NDVI amplitude, hunter effort, road density, terrain roughness, and canopy cover influence MD harvest in Nebraska. According to our model, MD harvest densities are significantly greater areas with NDVI amplitude ∼38, increasing hunter effort, road densities near 1,750 m/km(2), increasing terrain roughness, and decreasing canopy cover. Understanding increased harvest densities of MD can be beneficial for wildlife managers, allowing for more efficient allocation of efforts and expenses by managers for population management. PeerJ Inc. 2018-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6136395/ /pubmed/30221086 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5510 Text en ©2018 O’Connor et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Coupled Natural and Human Systems O’Connor, Bryan J. Fryda, Nicolas J. Ranglack, Dustin H. Effects of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features on mule deer harvest in Nebraska |
title | Effects of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features on mule deer harvest in Nebraska |
title_full | Effects of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features on mule deer harvest in Nebraska |
title_fullStr | Effects of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features on mule deer harvest in Nebraska |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features on mule deer harvest in Nebraska |
title_short | Effects of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features on mule deer harvest in Nebraska |
title_sort | effects of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features on mule deer harvest in nebraska |
topic | Coupled Natural and Human Systems |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6136395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30221086 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5510 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oconnorbryanj effectsofenvironmentalandanthropogeniclandscapefeaturesonmuledeerharvestinnebraska AT frydanicolasj effectsofenvironmentalandanthropogeniclandscapefeaturesonmuledeerharvestinnebraska AT ranglackdustinh effectsofenvironmentalandanthropogeniclandscapefeaturesonmuledeerharvestinnebraska |