Cargando…
Event segmentation protects emotional memories from competing experiences encoded close in time
Fear memories are characterized by their permanence and a fierce resistance to unlearning by new experiences. We considered whether this durability involves a process of memory segmentation that separates competing experiences. To address this question, we used an emotional learning task designed to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6136428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30221203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0317-4 |
_version_ | 1783354997913681920 |
---|---|
author | Dunsmoor, Joseph E. Kroes, Marijn C.W. Moscatelli, Caroline M. Evans, Michael D. Davachi, Lila Phelps, Elizabeth A. |
author_facet | Dunsmoor, Joseph E. Kroes, Marijn C.W. Moscatelli, Caroline M. Evans, Michael D. Davachi, Lila Phelps, Elizabeth A. |
author_sort | Dunsmoor, Joseph E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Fear memories are characterized by their permanence and a fierce resistance to unlearning by new experiences. We considered whether this durability involves a process of memory segmentation that separates competing experiences. To address this question, we used an emotional learning task designed to measure recognition memory for category exemplars encoded during competing experiences of fear-conditioning and extinction. Here we show that people recognized more fear-conditioned exemplars encoded during conditioning than conceptually related exemplars encoded immediately after a perceptual event boundary separating conditioning from extinction. Selective episodic memory depended on a period of consolidation, an explicit break between competing experiences, and was unrelated to within-session arousal or the explicit realization of a transition from conditioning to extinction. Collectively, these findings suggest that event boundaries guide selective consolidation to prioritize emotional information in memory—at the expense of related but conflicting information experienced shortly thereafter. We put forward a model whereby event boundaries bifurcate related memory traces for incompatible experiences. This stands in contrast to a mechanism that integrates related experiences for adaptive generalization(123), and reveals a potentially distinct organization by which competing memories are adaptively segmented to select and protect nascent fear memories from immediate sources of interference. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6136428 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61364282018-09-14 Event segmentation protects emotional memories from competing experiences encoded close in time Dunsmoor, Joseph E. Kroes, Marijn C.W. Moscatelli, Caroline M. Evans, Michael D. Davachi, Lila Phelps, Elizabeth A. Nat Hum Behav Article Fear memories are characterized by their permanence and a fierce resistance to unlearning by new experiences. We considered whether this durability involves a process of memory segmentation that separates competing experiences. To address this question, we used an emotional learning task designed to measure recognition memory for category exemplars encoded during competing experiences of fear-conditioning and extinction. Here we show that people recognized more fear-conditioned exemplars encoded during conditioning than conceptually related exemplars encoded immediately after a perceptual event boundary separating conditioning from extinction. Selective episodic memory depended on a period of consolidation, an explicit break between competing experiences, and was unrelated to within-session arousal or the explicit realization of a transition from conditioning to extinction. Collectively, these findings suggest that event boundaries guide selective consolidation to prioritize emotional information in memory—at the expense of related but conflicting information experienced shortly thereafter. We put forward a model whereby event boundaries bifurcate related memory traces for incompatible experiences. This stands in contrast to a mechanism that integrates related experiences for adaptive generalization(123), and reveals a potentially distinct organization by which competing memories are adaptively segmented to select and protect nascent fear memories from immediate sources of interference. 2018-03-05 2018-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6136428/ /pubmed/30221203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0317-4 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Dunsmoor, Joseph E. Kroes, Marijn C.W. Moscatelli, Caroline M. Evans, Michael D. Davachi, Lila Phelps, Elizabeth A. Event segmentation protects emotional memories from competing experiences encoded close in time |
title | Event segmentation protects emotional memories from competing experiences encoded close in time |
title_full | Event segmentation protects emotional memories from competing experiences encoded close in time |
title_fullStr | Event segmentation protects emotional memories from competing experiences encoded close in time |
title_full_unstemmed | Event segmentation protects emotional memories from competing experiences encoded close in time |
title_short | Event segmentation protects emotional memories from competing experiences encoded close in time |
title_sort | event segmentation protects emotional memories from competing experiences encoded close in time |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6136428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30221203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0317-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dunsmoorjosephe eventsegmentationprotectsemotionalmemoriesfromcompetingexperiencesencodedcloseintime AT kroesmarijncw eventsegmentationprotectsemotionalmemoriesfromcompetingexperiencesencodedcloseintime AT moscatellicarolinem eventsegmentationprotectsemotionalmemoriesfromcompetingexperiencesencodedcloseintime AT evansmichaeld eventsegmentationprotectsemotionalmemoriesfromcompetingexperiencesencodedcloseintime AT davachilila eventsegmentationprotectsemotionalmemoriesfromcompetingexperiencesencodedcloseintime AT phelpselizabetha eventsegmentationprotectsemotionalmemoriesfromcompetingexperiencesencodedcloseintime |