Cargando…

Event segmentation protects emotional memories from competing experiences encoded close in time

Fear memories are characterized by their permanence and a fierce resistance to unlearning by new experiences. We considered whether this durability involves a process of memory segmentation that separates competing experiences. To address this question, we used an emotional learning task designed to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dunsmoor, Joseph E., Kroes, Marijn C.W., Moscatelli, Caroline M., Evans, Michael D., Davachi, Lila, Phelps, Elizabeth A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6136428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30221203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0317-4
_version_ 1783354997913681920
author Dunsmoor, Joseph E.
Kroes, Marijn C.W.
Moscatelli, Caroline M.
Evans, Michael D.
Davachi, Lila
Phelps, Elizabeth A.
author_facet Dunsmoor, Joseph E.
Kroes, Marijn C.W.
Moscatelli, Caroline M.
Evans, Michael D.
Davachi, Lila
Phelps, Elizabeth A.
author_sort Dunsmoor, Joseph E.
collection PubMed
description Fear memories are characterized by their permanence and a fierce resistance to unlearning by new experiences. We considered whether this durability involves a process of memory segmentation that separates competing experiences. To address this question, we used an emotional learning task designed to measure recognition memory for category exemplars encoded during competing experiences of fear-conditioning and extinction. Here we show that people recognized more fear-conditioned exemplars encoded during conditioning than conceptually related exemplars encoded immediately after a perceptual event boundary separating conditioning from extinction. Selective episodic memory depended on a period of consolidation, an explicit break between competing experiences, and was unrelated to within-session arousal or the explicit realization of a transition from conditioning to extinction. Collectively, these findings suggest that event boundaries guide selective consolidation to prioritize emotional information in memory—at the expense of related but conflicting information experienced shortly thereafter. We put forward a model whereby event boundaries bifurcate related memory traces for incompatible experiences. This stands in contrast to a mechanism that integrates related experiences for adaptive generalization(123), and reveals a potentially distinct organization by which competing memories are adaptively segmented to select and protect nascent fear memories from immediate sources of interference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6136428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61364282018-09-14 Event segmentation protects emotional memories from competing experiences encoded close in time Dunsmoor, Joseph E. Kroes, Marijn C.W. Moscatelli, Caroline M. Evans, Michael D. Davachi, Lila Phelps, Elizabeth A. Nat Hum Behav Article Fear memories are characterized by their permanence and a fierce resistance to unlearning by new experiences. We considered whether this durability involves a process of memory segmentation that separates competing experiences. To address this question, we used an emotional learning task designed to measure recognition memory for category exemplars encoded during competing experiences of fear-conditioning and extinction. Here we show that people recognized more fear-conditioned exemplars encoded during conditioning than conceptually related exemplars encoded immediately after a perceptual event boundary separating conditioning from extinction. Selective episodic memory depended on a period of consolidation, an explicit break between competing experiences, and was unrelated to within-session arousal or the explicit realization of a transition from conditioning to extinction. Collectively, these findings suggest that event boundaries guide selective consolidation to prioritize emotional information in memory—at the expense of related but conflicting information experienced shortly thereafter. We put forward a model whereby event boundaries bifurcate related memory traces for incompatible experiences. This stands in contrast to a mechanism that integrates related experiences for adaptive generalization(123), and reveals a potentially distinct organization by which competing memories are adaptively segmented to select and protect nascent fear memories from immediate sources of interference. 2018-03-05 2018-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6136428/ /pubmed/30221203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0317-4 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Dunsmoor, Joseph E.
Kroes, Marijn C.W.
Moscatelli, Caroline M.
Evans, Michael D.
Davachi, Lila
Phelps, Elizabeth A.
Event segmentation protects emotional memories from competing experiences encoded close in time
title Event segmentation protects emotional memories from competing experiences encoded close in time
title_full Event segmentation protects emotional memories from competing experiences encoded close in time
title_fullStr Event segmentation protects emotional memories from competing experiences encoded close in time
title_full_unstemmed Event segmentation protects emotional memories from competing experiences encoded close in time
title_short Event segmentation protects emotional memories from competing experiences encoded close in time
title_sort event segmentation protects emotional memories from competing experiences encoded close in time
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6136428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30221203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0317-4
work_keys_str_mv AT dunsmoorjosephe eventsegmentationprotectsemotionalmemoriesfromcompetingexperiencesencodedcloseintime
AT kroesmarijncw eventsegmentationprotectsemotionalmemoriesfromcompetingexperiencesencodedcloseintime
AT moscatellicarolinem eventsegmentationprotectsemotionalmemoriesfromcompetingexperiencesencodedcloseintime
AT evansmichaeld eventsegmentationprotectsemotionalmemoriesfromcompetingexperiencesencodedcloseintime
AT davachilila eventsegmentationprotectsemotionalmemoriesfromcompetingexperiencesencodedcloseintime
AT phelpselizabetha eventsegmentationprotectsemotionalmemoriesfromcompetingexperiencesencodedcloseintime