Cargando…

A Comparison between Piezoelectric Devices and Conventional Rotary Instruments in Bone Harvesting in Patients with Lip and Palate Cleft: A Retrospective Study with Clinical, Radiographical, and Histological Evaluation

INTRODUCTION: Orofacial clefts are congenital malformations characterized by an incomplete shaping of structures that separate the nasal from the oral cavity and can affect the right, left, or both sides. The aim of the present study is to assess, with clinical, radiographical, and histological eval...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rullo, R., Piccirillo, A., Femiano, F., Nastri, L., Festa, V. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6136495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30228982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2059464
_version_ 1783355008468647936
author Rullo, R.
Piccirillo, A.
Femiano, F.
Nastri, L.
Festa, V. M.
author_facet Rullo, R.
Piccirillo, A.
Femiano, F.
Nastri, L.
Festa, V. M.
author_sort Rullo, R.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Orofacial clefts are congenital malformations characterized by an incomplete shaping of structures that separate the nasal from the oral cavity and can affect the right, left, or both sides. The aim of the present study is to assess, with clinical, radiographical, and histological evaluations, the efficacy of piezoelectric devices compared to traditional rotating instruments in the bone harvesting in patients with history of cleft. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have conducted a retrospective analysis on 20 patients with a history of orofacial clefts that were operated on from February 2014 to June 2017. The patients were divided into two groups: Group R in which bone graft was harvested using a burr and Group P in which the bone graft was obtained by a piezoelectric device. After a healing period of 8 months from the grafting procedure, clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The use of the piezoelectric devices in bone harvesting allows a slight improvement in the final volume. This supports a faster integration into the receiving site. CONCLUSIONS: The use of piezoelectric device in patients with history of orofacial cleft that needed bone graft represents a method to be taken into consideration because it has interesting advantages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6136495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61364952018-09-18 A Comparison between Piezoelectric Devices and Conventional Rotary Instruments in Bone Harvesting in Patients with Lip and Palate Cleft: A Retrospective Study with Clinical, Radiographical, and Histological Evaluation Rullo, R. Piccirillo, A. Femiano, F. Nastri, L. Festa, V. M. Biomed Res Int Research Article INTRODUCTION: Orofacial clefts are congenital malformations characterized by an incomplete shaping of structures that separate the nasal from the oral cavity and can affect the right, left, or both sides. The aim of the present study is to assess, with clinical, radiographical, and histological evaluations, the efficacy of piezoelectric devices compared to traditional rotating instruments in the bone harvesting in patients with history of cleft. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have conducted a retrospective analysis on 20 patients with a history of orofacial clefts that were operated on from February 2014 to June 2017. The patients were divided into two groups: Group R in which bone graft was harvested using a burr and Group P in which the bone graft was obtained by a piezoelectric device. After a healing period of 8 months from the grafting procedure, clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The use of the piezoelectric devices in bone harvesting allows a slight improvement in the final volume. This supports a faster integration into the receiving site. CONCLUSIONS: The use of piezoelectric device in patients with history of orofacial cleft that needed bone graft represents a method to be taken into consideration because it has interesting advantages. Hindawi 2018-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6136495/ /pubmed/30228982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2059464 Text en Copyright © 2018 R. Rullo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rullo, R.
Piccirillo, A.
Femiano, F.
Nastri, L.
Festa, V. M.
A Comparison between Piezoelectric Devices and Conventional Rotary Instruments in Bone Harvesting in Patients with Lip and Palate Cleft: A Retrospective Study with Clinical, Radiographical, and Histological Evaluation
title A Comparison between Piezoelectric Devices and Conventional Rotary Instruments in Bone Harvesting in Patients with Lip and Palate Cleft: A Retrospective Study with Clinical, Radiographical, and Histological Evaluation
title_full A Comparison between Piezoelectric Devices and Conventional Rotary Instruments in Bone Harvesting in Patients with Lip and Palate Cleft: A Retrospective Study with Clinical, Radiographical, and Histological Evaluation
title_fullStr A Comparison between Piezoelectric Devices and Conventional Rotary Instruments in Bone Harvesting in Patients with Lip and Palate Cleft: A Retrospective Study with Clinical, Radiographical, and Histological Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison between Piezoelectric Devices and Conventional Rotary Instruments in Bone Harvesting in Patients with Lip and Palate Cleft: A Retrospective Study with Clinical, Radiographical, and Histological Evaluation
title_short A Comparison between Piezoelectric Devices and Conventional Rotary Instruments in Bone Harvesting in Patients with Lip and Palate Cleft: A Retrospective Study with Clinical, Radiographical, and Histological Evaluation
title_sort comparison between piezoelectric devices and conventional rotary instruments in bone harvesting in patients with lip and palate cleft: a retrospective study with clinical, radiographical, and histological evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6136495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30228982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2059464
work_keys_str_mv AT rullor acomparisonbetweenpiezoelectricdevicesandconventionalrotaryinstrumentsinboneharvestinginpatientswithlipandpalatecleftaretrospectivestudywithclinicalradiographicalandhistologicalevaluation
AT piccirilloa acomparisonbetweenpiezoelectricdevicesandconventionalrotaryinstrumentsinboneharvestinginpatientswithlipandpalatecleftaretrospectivestudywithclinicalradiographicalandhistologicalevaluation
AT femianof acomparisonbetweenpiezoelectricdevicesandconventionalrotaryinstrumentsinboneharvestinginpatientswithlipandpalatecleftaretrospectivestudywithclinicalradiographicalandhistologicalevaluation
AT nastril acomparisonbetweenpiezoelectricdevicesandconventionalrotaryinstrumentsinboneharvestinginpatientswithlipandpalatecleftaretrospectivestudywithclinicalradiographicalandhistologicalevaluation
AT festavm acomparisonbetweenpiezoelectricdevicesandconventionalrotaryinstrumentsinboneharvestinginpatientswithlipandpalatecleftaretrospectivestudywithclinicalradiographicalandhistologicalevaluation
AT rullor comparisonbetweenpiezoelectricdevicesandconventionalrotaryinstrumentsinboneharvestinginpatientswithlipandpalatecleftaretrospectivestudywithclinicalradiographicalandhistologicalevaluation
AT piccirilloa comparisonbetweenpiezoelectricdevicesandconventionalrotaryinstrumentsinboneharvestinginpatientswithlipandpalatecleftaretrospectivestudywithclinicalradiographicalandhistologicalevaluation
AT femianof comparisonbetweenpiezoelectricdevicesandconventionalrotaryinstrumentsinboneharvestinginpatientswithlipandpalatecleftaretrospectivestudywithclinicalradiographicalandhistologicalevaluation
AT nastril comparisonbetweenpiezoelectricdevicesandconventionalrotaryinstrumentsinboneharvestinginpatientswithlipandpalatecleftaretrospectivestudywithclinicalradiographicalandhistologicalevaluation
AT festavm comparisonbetweenpiezoelectricdevicesandconventionalrotaryinstrumentsinboneharvestinginpatientswithlipandpalatecleftaretrospectivestudywithclinicalradiographicalandhistologicalevaluation