Cargando…
Measurement invariance of the SF-12 among different demographic groups: The HELIUS study
AIM: To investigate whether items of the SF-12, widely used to assess health outcome in clinical practice and public health research, provide unbiased measurements of underlying constructs in different demographic groups regarding gender, age, educational level and ethnicity. METHODS: We included 23...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6136718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30212480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203483 |
_version_ | 1783355054065975296 |
---|---|
author | Galenkamp, Henrike Stronks, Karien Mokkink, Lidwine B. Derks, Eske M. |
author_facet | Galenkamp, Henrike Stronks, Karien Mokkink, Lidwine B. Derks, Eske M. |
author_sort | Galenkamp, Henrike |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To investigate whether items of the SF-12, widely used to assess health outcome in clinical practice and public health research, provide unbiased measurements of underlying constructs in different demographic groups regarding gender, age, educational level and ethnicity. METHODS: We included 23,146 men and women aged 18–70 of Dutch, South-Asian Surinamese, African Surinamese, Ghanaian, Turkish, or Moroccan origin from the HELIUS study. Both multiple group confirmatory factor analyses (MGCFA), with increasingly stringent model constraints (i.e. assessing Configural, Metric, Strong and Strict measurement invariance (MI)), and regression analysis were conducted to establish comparability of SF-12 items across demographic groups. RESULTS: MI regarding gender, age and education was tested in the ethnic Dutch group (N = 4,615). In each subsequent step of testing MI, change in goodness-of-fit measures did not exceed 0.010 (RMSEA) or 0.004 (CFI). Moreover, goodness-of-fit indices showed good fit for strict invariance models: RMSEA<0.055; CFI>0.97. Regarding ethnicity, RMSEA values of metric and subsequent models fell above 0.055, indicating violation of measurement invariance in factor loadings, thresholds and residual variances. Regression analysis revealed possible age-, education- and ethnicity-related DIF. Adjustment for this DIF had little impact on the magnitude of age and educational differences in physical and mental health, but ethnic inequalities in physical health–and to a lesser extent mental health—were reduced after DIF adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence of violation of measurement invariance of the SF-12 regarding gender, age and educational level. If minor DIF would remain undetected in our MGCFA analyses, we showed that this would have negligible effect on the magnitude of demographic health inequalities. Regarding ethnicity, the SF-12 was not measurement invariant. After accounting for DIF, we observed a reduction of ethnic inequalities in health, in particular in physical health. Caution is warranted when comparing SF-12 scores across population groups with various ethnic backgrounds. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6136718 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61367182018-09-27 Measurement invariance of the SF-12 among different demographic groups: The HELIUS study Galenkamp, Henrike Stronks, Karien Mokkink, Lidwine B. Derks, Eske M. PLoS One Research Article AIM: To investigate whether items of the SF-12, widely used to assess health outcome in clinical practice and public health research, provide unbiased measurements of underlying constructs in different demographic groups regarding gender, age, educational level and ethnicity. METHODS: We included 23,146 men and women aged 18–70 of Dutch, South-Asian Surinamese, African Surinamese, Ghanaian, Turkish, or Moroccan origin from the HELIUS study. Both multiple group confirmatory factor analyses (MGCFA), with increasingly stringent model constraints (i.e. assessing Configural, Metric, Strong and Strict measurement invariance (MI)), and regression analysis were conducted to establish comparability of SF-12 items across demographic groups. RESULTS: MI regarding gender, age and education was tested in the ethnic Dutch group (N = 4,615). In each subsequent step of testing MI, change in goodness-of-fit measures did not exceed 0.010 (RMSEA) or 0.004 (CFI). Moreover, goodness-of-fit indices showed good fit for strict invariance models: RMSEA<0.055; CFI>0.97. Regarding ethnicity, RMSEA values of metric and subsequent models fell above 0.055, indicating violation of measurement invariance in factor loadings, thresholds and residual variances. Regression analysis revealed possible age-, education- and ethnicity-related DIF. Adjustment for this DIF had little impact on the magnitude of age and educational differences in physical and mental health, but ethnic inequalities in physical health–and to a lesser extent mental health—were reduced after DIF adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence of violation of measurement invariance of the SF-12 regarding gender, age and educational level. If minor DIF would remain undetected in our MGCFA analyses, we showed that this would have negligible effect on the magnitude of demographic health inequalities. Regarding ethnicity, the SF-12 was not measurement invariant. After accounting for DIF, we observed a reduction of ethnic inequalities in health, in particular in physical health. Caution is warranted when comparing SF-12 scores across population groups with various ethnic backgrounds. Public Library of Science 2018-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6136718/ /pubmed/30212480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203483 Text en © 2018 Galenkamp et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Galenkamp, Henrike Stronks, Karien Mokkink, Lidwine B. Derks, Eske M. Measurement invariance of the SF-12 among different demographic groups: The HELIUS study |
title | Measurement invariance of the SF-12 among different demographic groups: The HELIUS study |
title_full | Measurement invariance of the SF-12 among different demographic groups: The HELIUS study |
title_fullStr | Measurement invariance of the SF-12 among different demographic groups: The HELIUS study |
title_full_unstemmed | Measurement invariance of the SF-12 among different demographic groups: The HELIUS study |
title_short | Measurement invariance of the SF-12 among different demographic groups: The HELIUS study |
title_sort | measurement invariance of the sf-12 among different demographic groups: the helius study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6136718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30212480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203483 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT galenkamphenrike measurementinvarianceofthesf12amongdifferentdemographicgroupstheheliusstudy AT stronkskarien measurementinvarianceofthesf12amongdifferentdemographicgroupstheheliusstudy AT mokkinklidwineb measurementinvarianceofthesf12amongdifferentdemographicgroupstheheliusstudy AT derkseskem measurementinvarianceofthesf12amongdifferentdemographicgroupstheheliusstudy |