Cargando…

Interdevice variability of central corneal thickness measurement

PURPOSE: To evaluate variability of central corneal thickness measurement (CCT) devices using a hitherto unprecedented number of CCT devices. METHODS: CCT was measured consecutively in 122 normal corneas of 61 subjects with seven different devices using three distinct measurement technologies: Schei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maloca, Peter M., Studer, Harald P., Ambrósio, Renato, Goldblum, David, Rothenbuehler, Simon, Barthelmes, Daniel, Zweifel, Sandrine, Scholl, Hendrik P. N., Balaskas, Konstantinos, Tufail, Adnan, Hasler, Pascal W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6136793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30212550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203884
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To evaluate variability of central corneal thickness measurement (CCT) devices using a hitherto unprecedented number of CCT devices. METHODS: CCT was measured consecutively in 122 normal corneas of 61 subjects with seven different devices using three distinct measurement technologies: Scheimpflug, Ultrasound, and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). Per device deviation from the mean CCT value per eye was used to determine which of the devices performed best, compared to the mean value. RESULTS: Cirrus OCT yielded the lowest deviation. Deviations of the individual devices from the mean CCT of each eye were (OS/OD) 12.8±5.0/14.9±9.4 μm for Topcon noncontact specular microscopy (NCSM), 11.3±5.9/10.6±7.3 μm for Pentacam, 10.7±5.2/10.4±4.8 μm for Spectralis OCT, 6.0±3.9/6.2±4.9 μm for Topcon DRI OCT, 5.1±3.4/5.9±10.3 μm for AngioVue OCT, 4.8±4.1/5.7±4.6 μm for US pachymetry, and 4.2±3.2/5.7±4.6 μm for Cirrus OCT. The maximum differences between US pachymetry and the other devices were very high (up to 120 μm). CONCLUSION: Central corneal thickness may be under- or overestimated due to high interdevice variations. Measuring CCT with one device only may lead to inappropriate clinical and surgical recommendations. OCT showed superior results.