Cargando…

Interdevice variability of central corneal thickness measurement

PURPOSE: To evaluate variability of central corneal thickness measurement (CCT) devices using a hitherto unprecedented number of CCT devices. METHODS: CCT was measured consecutively in 122 normal corneas of 61 subjects with seven different devices using three distinct measurement technologies: Schei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maloca, Peter M., Studer, Harald P., Ambrósio, Renato, Goldblum, David, Rothenbuehler, Simon, Barthelmes, Daniel, Zweifel, Sandrine, Scholl, Hendrik P. N., Balaskas, Konstantinos, Tufail, Adnan, Hasler, Pascal W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6136793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30212550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203884
_version_ 1783355072113016832
author Maloca, Peter M.
Studer, Harald P.
Ambrósio, Renato
Goldblum, David
Rothenbuehler, Simon
Barthelmes, Daniel
Zweifel, Sandrine
Scholl, Hendrik P. N.
Balaskas, Konstantinos
Tufail, Adnan
Hasler, Pascal W.
author_facet Maloca, Peter M.
Studer, Harald P.
Ambrósio, Renato
Goldblum, David
Rothenbuehler, Simon
Barthelmes, Daniel
Zweifel, Sandrine
Scholl, Hendrik P. N.
Balaskas, Konstantinos
Tufail, Adnan
Hasler, Pascal W.
author_sort Maloca, Peter M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate variability of central corneal thickness measurement (CCT) devices using a hitherto unprecedented number of CCT devices. METHODS: CCT was measured consecutively in 122 normal corneas of 61 subjects with seven different devices using three distinct measurement technologies: Scheimpflug, Ultrasound, and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). Per device deviation from the mean CCT value per eye was used to determine which of the devices performed best, compared to the mean value. RESULTS: Cirrus OCT yielded the lowest deviation. Deviations of the individual devices from the mean CCT of each eye were (OS/OD) 12.8±5.0/14.9±9.4 μm for Topcon noncontact specular microscopy (NCSM), 11.3±5.9/10.6±7.3 μm for Pentacam, 10.7±5.2/10.4±4.8 μm for Spectralis OCT, 6.0±3.9/6.2±4.9 μm for Topcon DRI OCT, 5.1±3.4/5.9±10.3 μm for AngioVue OCT, 4.8±4.1/5.7±4.6 μm for US pachymetry, and 4.2±3.2/5.7±4.6 μm for Cirrus OCT. The maximum differences between US pachymetry and the other devices were very high (up to 120 μm). CONCLUSION: Central corneal thickness may be under- or overestimated due to high interdevice variations. Measuring CCT with one device only may lead to inappropriate clinical and surgical recommendations. OCT showed superior results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6136793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61367932018-09-27 Interdevice variability of central corneal thickness measurement Maloca, Peter M. Studer, Harald P. Ambrósio, Renato Goldblum, David Rothenbuehler, Simon Barthelmes, Daniel Zweifel, Sandrine Scholl, Hendrik P. N. Balaskas, Konstantinos Tufail, Adnan Hasler, Pascal W. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To evaluate variability of central corneal thickness measurement (CCT) devices using a hitherto unprecedented number of CCT devices. METHODS: CCT was measured consecutively in 122 normal corneas of 61 subjects with seven different devices using three distinct measurement technologies: Scheimpflug, Ultrasound, and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). Per device deviation from the mean CCT value per eye was used to determine which of the devices performed best, compared to the mean value. RESULTS: Cirrus OCT yielded the lowest deviation. Deviations of the individual devices from the mean CCT of each eye were (OS/OD) 12.8±5.0/14.9±9.4 μm for Topcon noncontact specular microscopy (NCSM), 11.3±5.9/10.6±7.3 μm for Pentacam, 10.7±5.2/10.4±4.8 μm for Spectralis OCT, 6.0±3.9/6.2±4.9 μm for Topcon DRI OCT, 5.1±3.4/5.9±10.3 μm for AngioVue OCT, 4.8±4.1/5.7±4.6 μm for US pachymetry, and 4.2±3.2/5.7±4.6 μm for Cirrus OCT. The maximum differences between US pachymetry and the other devices were very high (up to 120 μm). CONCLUSION: Central corneal thickness may be under- or overestimated due to high interdevice variations. Measuring CCT with one device only may lead to inappropriate clinical and surgical recommendations. OCT showed superior results. Public Library of Science 2018-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6136793/ /pubmed/30212550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203884 Text en © 2018 Maloca et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Maloca, Peter M.
Studer, Harald P.
Ambrósio, Renato
Goldblum, David
Rothenbuehler, Simon
Barthelmes, Daniel
Zweifel, Sandrine
Scholl, Hendrik P. N.
Balaskas, Konstantinos
Tufail, Adnan
Hasler, Pascal W.
Interdevice variability of central corneal thickness measurement
title Interdevice variability of central corneal thickness measurement
title_full Interdevice variability of central corneal thickness measurement
title_fullStr Interdevice variability of central corneal thickness measurement
title_full_unstemmed Interdevice variability of central corneal thickness measurement
title_short Interdevice variability of central corneal thickness measurement
title_sort interdevice variability of central corneal thickness measurement
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6136793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30212550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203884
work_keys_str_mv AT malocapeterm interdevicevariabilityofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurement
AT studerharaldp interdevicevariabilityofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurement
AT ambrosiorenato interdevicevariabilityofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurement
AT goldblumdavid interdevicevariabilityofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurement
AT rothenbuehlersimon interdevicevariabilityofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurement
AT barthelmesdaniel interdevicevariabilityofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurement
AT zweifelsandrine interdevicevariabilityofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurement
AT schollhendrikpn interdevicevariabilityofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurement
AT balaskaskonstantinos interdevicevariabilityofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurement
AT tufailadnan interdevicevariabilityofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurement
AT haslerpascalw interdevicevariabilityofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurement