Cargando…
Interdevice variability of central corneal thickness measurement
PURPOSE: To evaluate variability of central corneal thickness measurement (CCT) devices using a hitherto unprecedented number of CCT devices. METHODS: CCT was measured consecutively in 122 normal corneas of 61 subjects with seven different devices using three distinct measurement technologies: Schei...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6136793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30212550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203884 |
_version_ | 1783355072113016832 |
---|---|
author | Maloca, Peter M. Studer, Harald P. Ambrósio, Renato Goldblum, David Rothenbuehler, Simon Barthelmes, Daniel Zweifel, Sandrine Scholl, Hendrik P. N. Balaskas, Konstantinos Tufail, Adnan Hasler, Pascal W. |
author_facet | Maloca, Peter M. Studer, Harald P. Ambrósio, Renato Goldblum, David Rothenbuehler, Simon Barthelmes, Daniel Zweifel, Sandrine Scholl, Hendrik P. N. Balaskas, Konstantinos Tufail, Adnan Hasler, Pascal W. |
author_sort | Maloca, Peter M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate variability of central corneal thickness measurement (CCT) devices using a hitherto unprecedented number of CCT devices. METHODS: CCT was measured consecutively in 122 normal corneas of 61 subjects with seven different devices using three distinct measurement technologies: Scheimpflug, Ultrasound, and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). Per device deviation from the mean CCT value per eye was used to determine which of the devices performed best, compared to the mean value. RESULTS: Cirrus OCT yielded the lowest deviation. Deviations of the individual devices from the mean CCT of each eye were (OS/OD) 12.8±5.0/14.9±9.4 μm for Topcon noncontact specular microscopy (NCSM), 11.3±5.9/10.6±7.3 μm for Pentacam, 10.7±5.2/10.4±4.8 μm for Spectralis OCT, 6.0±3.9/6.2±4.9 μm for Topcon DRI OCT, 5.1±3.4/5.9±10.3 μm for AngioVue OCT, 4.8±4.1/5.7±4.6 μm for US pachymetry, and 4.2±3.2/5.7±4.6 μm for Cirrus OCT. The maximum differences between US pachymetry and the other devices were very high (up to 120 μm). CONCLUSION: Central corneal thickness may be under- or overestimated due to high interdevice variations. Measuring CCT with one device only may lead to inappropriate clinical and surgical recommendations. OCT showed superior results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6136793 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61367932018-09-27 Interdevice variability of central corneal thickness measurement Maloca, Peter M. Studer, Harald P. Ambrósio, Renato Goldblum, David Rothenbuehler, Simon Barthelmes, Daniel Zweifel, Sandrine Scholl, Hendrik P. N. Balaskas, Konstantinos Tufail, Adnan Hasler, Pascal W. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To evaluate variability of central corneal thickness measurement (CCT) devices using a hitherto unprecedented number of CCT devices. METHODS: CCT was measured consecutively in 122 normal corneas of 61 subjects with seven different devices using three distinct measurement technologies: Scheimpflug, Ultrasound, and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). Per device deviation from the mean CCT value per eye was used to determine which of the devices performed best, compared to the mean value. RESULTS: Cirrus OCT yielded the lowest deviation. Deviations of the individual devices from the mean CCT of each eye were (OS/OD) 12.8±5.0/14.9±9.4 μm for Topcon noncontact specular microscopy (NCSM), 11.3±5.9/10.6±7.3 μm for Pentacam, 10.7±5.2/10.4±4.8 μm for Spectralis OCT, 6.0±3.9/6.2±4.9 μm for Topcon DRI OCT, 5.1±3.4/5.9±10.3 μm for AngioVue OCT, 4.8±4.1/5.7±4.6 μm for US pachymetry, and 4.2±3.2/5.7±4.6 μm for Cirrus OCT. The maximum differences between US pachymetry and the other devices were very high (up to 120 μm). CONCLUSION: Central corneal thickness may be under- or overestimated due to high interdevice variations. Measuring CCT with one device only may lead to inappropriate clinical and surgical recommendations. OCT showed superior results. Public Library of Science 2018-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6136793/ /pubmed/30212550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203884 Text en © 2018 Maloca et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Maloca, Peter M. Studer, Harald P. Ambrósio, Renato Goldblum, David Rothenbuehler, Simon Barthelmes, Daniel Zweifel, Sandrine Scholl, Hendrik P. N. Balaskas, Konstantinos Tufail, Adnan Hasler, Pascal W. Interdevice variability of central corneal thickness measurement |
title | Interdevice variability of central corneal thickness measurement |
title_full | Interdevice variability of central corneal thickness measurement |
title_fullStr | Interdevice variability of central corneal thickness measurement |
title_full_unstemmed | Interdevice variability of central corneal thickness measurement |
title_short | Interdevice variability of central corneal thickness measurement |
title_sort | interdevice variability of central corneal thickness measurement |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6136793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30212550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203884 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malocapeterm interdevicevariabilityofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurement AT studerharaldp interdevicevariabilityofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurement AT ambrosiorenato interdevicevariabilityofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurement AT goldblumdavid interdevicevariabilityofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurement AT rothenbuehlersimon interdevicevariabilityofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurement AT barthelmesdaniel interdevicevariabilityofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurement AT zweifelsandrine interdevicevariabilityofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurement AT schollhendrikpn interdevicevariabilityofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurement AT balaskaskonstantinos interdevicevariabilityofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurement AT tufailadnan interdevicevariabilityofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurement AT haslerpascalw interdevicevariabilityofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurement |