Cargando…

Assessing the credibility and transferability of the patient compassion model in non-cancer palliative populations

BACKGROUND: A lack of evidence and psychometrically sound measures of compassion necessitated the development of the first known, empirically derived, theoretical Patient Compassion Model (PCM) generated from qualitative interviews with advanced cancer inpatients. We aimed to assess the credibility...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sinclair, Shane, Jaggi, Priya, Hack, Thomas F., McClement, Susan E., Raffin-Bouchal, Shelley, Singh, Pavneet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6137734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30213263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0358-5
_version_ 1783355227862204416
author Sinclair, Shane
Jaggi, Priya
Hack, Thomas F.
McClement, Susan E.
Raffin-Bouchal, Shelley
Singh, Pavneet
author_facet Sinclair, Shane
Jaggi, Priya
Hack, Thomas F.
McClement, Susan E.
Raffin-Bouchal, Shelley
Singh, Pavneet
author_sort Sinclair, Shane
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A lack of evidence and psychometrically sound measures of compassion necessitated the development of the first known, empirically derived, theoretical Patient Compassion Model (PCM) generated from qualitative interviews with advanced cancer inpatients. We aimed to assess the credibility and transferability of the PCM across diverse palliative populations and settings. METHODS: Semi-structured, audio-recorded qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 patients with life-limiting diagnoses, recruited from 4 settings (acute care, homecare, residential care, and hospice). Participants were first asked to share their understandings and experiences of compassion. They were then presented with an overview of the PCM and asked to determine whether: 1) the model resonated with their understanding and experiences of compassion; 2) the model required any modification(s); 3) they had further insights on the model’s domains and/or themes. Members of the research team analyzed the qualitative data using constant comparative analysis. RESULTS: Both patients’ personal perspectives of compassion prior to viewing the model and their specific feedback after being provided an overview of the model confirmed the credibility and transferability of the PCM. While new codes were incorporated into the original coding schema, no new domains or themes emerged from this study sample. These additional codes provided a more comprehensive understanding of the nuances within the domains and themes of the PCM that will aid in the generation of items for an ongoing study to develop a patient reported measure of compassion. CONCLUSIONS: A diverse palliative patient population confirmed the credibility and transferability of the PCM within palliative care, extending the rigour and applicability of the PCM that was originally developed within an advanced cancer population. The views of a diverse palliative patient population on compassion helped to validate previous codes and supplement the existing coding schema, informing the development of a guiding framework for the generation of a patient-reported measure of compassion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6137734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61377342018-09-15 Assessing the credibility and transferability of the patient compassion model in non-cancer palliative populations Sinclair, Shane Jaggi, Priya Hack, Thomas F. McClement, Susan E. Raffin-Bouchal, Shelley Singh, Pavneet BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: A lack of evidence and psychometrically sound measures of compassion necessitated the development of the first known, empirically derived, theoretical Patient Compassion Model (PCM) generated from qualitative interviews with advanced cancer inpatients. We aimed to assess the credibility and transferability of the PCM across diverse palliative populations and settings. METHODS: Semi-structured, audio-recorded qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 patients with life-limiting diagnoses, recruited from 4 settings (acute care, homecare, residential care, and hospice). Participants were first asked to share their understandings and experiences of compassion. They were then presented with an overview of the PCM and asked to determine whether: 1) the model resonated with their understanding and experiences of compassion; 2) the model required any modification(s); 3) they had further insights on the model’s domains and/or themes. Members of the research team analyzed the qualitative data using constant comparative analysis. RESULTS: Both patients’ personal perspectives of compassion prior to viewing the model and their specific feedback after being provided an overview of the model confirmed the credibility and transferability of the PCM. While new codes were incorporated into the original coding schema, no new domains or themes emerged from this study sample. These additional codes provided a more comprehensive understanding of the nuances within the domains and themes of the PCM that will aid in the generation of items for an ongoing study to develop a patient reported measure of compassion. CONCLUSIONS: A diverse palliative patient population confirmed the credibility and transferability of the PCM within palliative care, extending the rigour and applicability of the PCM that was originally developed within an advanced cancer population. The views of a diverse palliative patient population on compassion helped to validate previous codes and supplement the existing coding schema, informing the development of a guiding framework for the generation of a patient-reported measure of compassion. BioMed Central 2018-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6137734/ /pubmed/30213263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0358-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sinclair, Shane
Jaggi, Priya
Hack, Thomas F.
McClement, Susan E.
Raffin-Bouchal, Shelley
Singh, Pavneet
Assessing the credibility and transferability of the patient compassion model in non-cancer palliative populations
title Assessing the credibility and transferability of the patient compassion model in non-cancer palliative populations
title_full Assessing the credibility and transferability of the patient compassion model in non-cancer palliative populations
title_fullStr Assessing the credibility and transferability of the patient compassion model in non-cancer palliative populations
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the credibility and transferability of the patient compassion model in non-cancer palliative populations
title_short Assessing the credibility and transferability of the patient compassion model in non-cancer palliative populations
title_sort assessing the credibility and transferability of the patient compassion model in non-cancer palliative populations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6137734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30213263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0358-5
work_keys_str_mv AT sinclairshane assessingthecredibilityandtransferabilityofthepatientcompassionmodelinnoncancerpalliativepopulations
AT jaggipriya assessingthecredibilityandtransferabilityofthepatientcompassionmodelinnoncancerpalliativepopulations
AT hackthomasf assessingthecredibilityandtransferabilityofthepatientcompassionmodelinnoncancerpalliativepopulations
AT mcclementsusane assessingthecredibilityandtransferabilityofthepatientcompassionmodelinnoncancerpalliativepopulations
AT raffinbouchalshelley assessingthecredibilityandtransferabilityofthepatientcompassionmodelinnoncancerpalliativepopulations
AT singhpavneet assessingthecredibilityandtransferabilityofthepatientcompassionmodelinnoncancerpalliativepopulations