Cargando…

A single determination of C-reactive protein does not suffice to declare a patient with a diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis ‘CRP-negative’

BACKGROUND: To be eligible to receive treatment with an anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF), non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) patients require either elevated levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) (CRP > upper limit of normal (ULN)) or magnetic resonance imaging assessment showing i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Landewé, Robert, Nurminen, Tommi, Davies, Owen, Baeten, Dominique
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6137888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30217232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-018-1707-8
_version_ 1783355249707188224
author Landewé, Robert
Nurminen, Tommi
Davies, Owen
Baeten, Dominique
author_facet Landewé, Robert
Nurminen, Tommi
Davies, Owen
Baeten, Dominique
author_sort Landewé, Robert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To be eligible to receive treatment with an anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF), non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) patients require either elevated levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) (CRP > upper limit of normal (ULN)) or magnetic resonance imaging assessment showing inflammation of the sacroiliac joints, in addition to meeting criteria for high disease activity. Many axSpA patients are classified as ‘CRP-negative’, or CRP normal, despite having levels close to the ULN, and are therefore formally ineligible for treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the likelihood of a CRP test indicating elevated levels in axSpA patients that have previously tested CRP normal. METHODS: RAPID-axSpA (NCT01087762) enrolled patients who were either magnetic resonance imaging positive or had elevated CRP (> ULN: 7.9 mg/L). CRP data from the double-blind period for placebo-randomised patients until re-randomisation to certolizumab pegol (week 16 for ASAS20 non-responders/week 24 for ASAS20 responders) were analysed. CRP was assessed at screening, baseline, and nine time points to week 24. Linear mixed models were used to investigate time trends, variability, and correlations of CRP data. RESULTS: Of 106 placebo-randomised patients with baseline CRP assessments, 26 (25%) tested CRP normal at baseline, of whom 13 (50%) had ≥ 1 test indicating elevated CRP to week 16. Of 80/106 (75%) patients with elevated baseline CRP, 25 (31%) had ≥ 1 normal CRP test to week 16. Linear mixed models did not reveal changes in mean CRP across placebo patients from baseline to week 24. CONCLUSIONS: In axSpA patients with CRP < ULN the CRP test should be repeated after ≥ 4 weeks as there is a substantial chance of finding a positive result for elevated CRP at subsequent testing, thereby allowing the patient access to treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01087762. Registered on 16 March 2010. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-018-1707-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6137888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61378882018-09-15 A single determination of C-reactive protein does not suffice to declare a patient with a diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis ‘CRP-negative’ Landewé, Robert Nurminen, Tommi Davies, Owen Baeten, Dominique Arthritis Res Ther Research Article BACKGROUND: To be eligible to receive treatment with an anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF), non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) patients require either elevated levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) (CRP > upper limit of normal (ULN)) or magnetic resonance imaging assessment showing inflammation of the sacroiliac joints, in addition to meeting criteria for high disease activity. Many axSpA patients are classified as ‘CRP-negative’, or CRP normal, despite having levels close to the ULN, and are therefore formally ineligible for treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the likelihood of a CRP test indicating elevated levels in axSpA patients that have previously tested CRP normal. METHODS: RAPID-axSpA (NCT01087762) enrolled patients who were either magnetic resonance imaging positive or had elevated CRP (> ULN: 7.9 mg/L). CRP data from the double-blind period for placebo-randomised patients until re-randomisation to certolizumab pegol (week 16 for ASAS20 non-responders/week 24 for ASAS20 responders) were analysed. CRP was assessed at screening, baseline, and nine time points to week 24. Linear mixed models were used to investigate time trends, variability, and correlations of CRP data. RESULTS: Of 106 placebo-randomised patients with baseline CRP assessments, 26 (25%) tested CRP normal at baseline, of whom 13 (50%) had ≥ 1 test indicating elevated CRP to week 16. Of 80/106 (75%) patients with elevated baseline CRP, 25 (31%) had ≥ 1 normal CRP test to week 16. Linear mixed models did not reveal changes in mean CRP across placebo patients from baseline to week 24. CONCLUSIONS: In axSpA patients with CRP < ULN the CRP test should be repeated after ≥ 4 weeks as there is a substantial chance of finding a positive result for elevated CRP at subsequent testing, thereby allowing the patient access to treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01087762. Registered on 16 March 2010. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-018-1707-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-09-14 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6137888/ /pubmed/30217232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-018-1707-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Landewé, Robert
Nurminen, Tommi
Davies, Owen
Baeten, Dominique
A single determination of C-reactive protein does not suffice to declare a patient with a diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis ‘CRP-negative’
title A single determination of C-reactive protein does not suffice to declare a patient with a diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis ‘CRP-negative’
title_full A single determination of C-reactive protein does not suffice to declare a patient with a diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis ‘CRP-negative’
title_fullStr A single determination of C-reactive protein does not suffice to declare a patient with a diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis ‘CRP-negative’
title_full_unstemmed A single determination of C-reactive protein does not suffice to declare a patient with a diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis ‘CRP-negative’
title_short A single determination of C-reactive protein does not suffice to declare a patient with a diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis ‘CRP-negative’
title_sort single determination of c-reactive protein does not suffice to declare a patient with a diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis ‘crp-negative’
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6137888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30217232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-018-1707-8
work_keys_str_mv AT landewerobert asingledeterminationofcreactiveproteindoesnotsufficetodeclareapatientwithadiagnosisofaxialspondyloarthritiscrpnegative
AT nurminentommi asingledeterminationofcreactiveproteindoesnotsufficetodeclareapatientwithadiagnosisofaxialspondyloarthritiscrpnegative
AT daviesowen asingledeterminationofcreactiveproteindoesnotsufficetodeclareapatientwithadiagnosisofaxialspondyloarthritiscrpnegative
AT baetendominique asingledeterminationofcreactiveproteindoesnotsufficetodeclareapatientwithadiagnosisofaxialspondyloarthritiscrpnegative
AT landewerobert singledeterminationofcreactiveproteindoesnotsufficetodeclareapatientwithadiagnosisofaxialspondyloarthritiscrpnegative
AT nurminentommi singledeterminationofcreactiveproteindoesnotsufficetodeclareapatientwithadiagnosisofaxialspondyloarthritiscrpnegative
AT daviesowen singledeterminationofcreactiveproteindoesnotsufficetodeclareapatientwithadiagnosisofaxialspondyloarthritiscrpnegative
AT baetendominique singledeterminationofcreactiveproteindoesnotsufficetodeclareapatientwithadiagnosisofaxialspondyloarthritiscrpnegative