Cargando…
Automatic selection of verification tools for efficient analysis of biochemical models
MOTIVATION: Formal verification is a computational approach that checks system correctness (in relation to a desired functionality). It has been widely used in engineering applications to verify that systems work correctly. Model checking, an algorithmic approach to verification, looks at whether a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6137970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29688313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty282 |
_version_ | 1783355267630497792 |
---|---|
author | Bakir, Mehmet Emin Konur, Savas Gheorghe, Marian Krasnogor, Natalio Stannett, Mike |
author_facet | Bakir, Mehmet Emin Konur, Savas Gheorghe, Marian Krasnogor, Natalio Stannett, Mike |
author_sort | Bakir, Mehmet Emin |
collection | PubMed |
description | MOTIVATION: Formal verification is a computational approach that checks system correctness (in relation to a desired functionality). It has been widely used in engineering applications to verify that systems work correctly. Model checking, an algorithmic approach to verification, looks at whether a system model satisfies its requirements specification. This approach has been applied to a large number of models in systems and synthetic biology as well as in systems medicine. Model checking is, however, computationally very expensive, and is not scalable to large models and systems. Consequently, statistical model checking (SMC), which relaxes some of the constraints of model checking, has been introduced to address this drawback. Several SMC tools have been developed; however, the performance of each tool significantly varies according to the system model in question and the type of requirements being verified. This makes it hard to know, a priori, which one to use for a given model and requirement, as choosing the most efficient tool for any biological application requires a significant degree of computational expertise, not usually available in biology labs. The objective of this article is to introduce a method and provide a tool leading to the automatic selection of the most appropriate model checker for the system of interest. RESULTS: We provide a system that can automatically predict the fastest model checking tool for a given biological model. Our results show that one can make predictions of high confidence, with over 90% accuracy. This implies significant performance gain in verification time and substantially reduces the ‘usability barrier’ enabling biologists to have access to this powerful computational technology. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SMC Predictor tool is available at http://www.smcpredictor.com. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6137970 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61379702018-09-24 Automatic selection of verification tools for efficient analysis of biochemical models Bakir, Mehmet Emin Konur, Savas Gheorghe, Marian Krasnogor, Natalio Stannett, Mike Bioinformatics Original Papers MOTIVATION: Formal verification is a computational approach that checks system correctness (in relation to a desired functionality). It has been widely used in engineering applications to verify that systems work correctly. Model checking, an algorithmic approach to verification, looks at whether a system model satisfies its requirements specification. This approach has been applied to a large number of models in systems and synthetic biology as well as in systems medicine. Model checking is, however, computationally very expensive, and is not scalable to large models and systems. Consequently, statistical model checking (SMC), which relaxes some of the constraints of model checking, has been introduced to address this drawback. Several SMC tools have been developed; however, the performance of each tool significantly varies according to the system model in question and the type of requirements being verified. This makes it hard to know, a priori, which one to use for a given model and requirement, as choosing the most efficient tool for any biological application requires a significant degree of computational expertise, not usually available in biology labs. The objective of this article is to introduce a method and provide a tool leading to the automatic selection of the most appropriate model checker for the system of interest. RESULTS: We provide a system that can automatically predict the fastest model checking tool for a given biological model. Our results show that one can make predictions of high confidence, with over 90% accuracy. This implies significant performance gain in verification time and substantially reduces the ‘usability barrier’ enabling biologists to have access to this powerful computational technology. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SMC Predictor tool is available at http://www.smcpredictor.com. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Oxford University Press 2018-09-15 2018-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6137970/ /pubmed/29688313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty282 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Papers Bakir, Mehmet Emin Konur, Savas Gheorghe, Marian Krasnogor, Natalio Stannett, Mike Automatic selection of verification tools for efficient analysis of biochemical models |
title | Automatic selection of verification tools for efficient analysis of biochemical models |
title_full | Automatic selection of verification tools for efficient analysis of biochemical models |
title_fullStr | Automatic selection of verification tools for efficient analysis of biochemical models |
title_full_unstemmed | Automatic selection of verification tools for efficient analysis of biochemical models |
title_short | Automatic selection of verification tools for efficient analysis of biochemical models |
title_sort | automatic selection of verification tools for efficient analysis of biochemical models |
topic | Original Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6137970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29688313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty282 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bakirmehmetemin automaticselectionofverificationtoolsforefficientanalysisofbiochemicalmodels AT konursavas automaticselectionofverificationtoolsforefficientanalysisofbiochemicalmodels AT gheorghemarian automaticselectionofverificationtoolsforefficientanalysisofbiochemicalmodels AT krasnogornatalio automaticselectionofverificationtoolsforefficientanalysisofbiochemicalmodels AT stannettmike automaticselectionofverificationtoolsforefficientanalysisofbiochemicalmodels |