Cargando…

Uterine Monitoring Techniques from Patients' and Users' Perspectives

Objective  To evaluate preferences from patients and users on 3 uterine monitoring techniques, during labor. Study Design  Women in term labor were simultaneously monitored with the intrauterine pressure catheter, the external tocodynamometer, and the electrohysterograph. Postpartum, these women fil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thijssen, Kirsten M. J., Vlemminx, Marion W. C., Westerhuis, Michelle E. M. H., Dieleman, Jeanne P., Van der Hout-Van der Jagt, M. Beatrijs, Oei, S. Guid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6138467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30250758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1669409
Descripción
Sumario:Objective  To evaluate preferences from patients and users on 3 uterine monitoring techniques, during labor. Study Design  Women in term labor were simultaneously monitored with the intrauterine pressure catheter, the external tocodynamometer, and the electrohysterograph. Postpartum, these women filled out a questionnaire evaluating their preferences and important aspects. Nurses completed a questionnaire evaluating users' preferences. Results  Of all 52 participating women, 80.8% preferred the electrohysterograph, 17.3% the intrauterine pressure catheter and 1.9% the external tocodynamometer. For these women, the electrohysterograph scored best regarding application and presence during labor ( p  < 0.001). Most important aspects were “least likely to harm” and “least discomfort”. Of 57 nurses, 40.4% preferred the electrohysterograph, 35.1% the external tocodynamometer, and 24.6% had no preference, or replied that their preference is subject to situation and patient. Conclusion  Patients prefer the electrohysterograph over the external tocodynamometer and the intrauterine pressure catheter, while healthcare providers report ambiguous results.