Cargando…
Uterine Monitoring Techniques from Patients' and Users' Perspectives
Objective To evaluate preferences from patients and users on 3 uterine monitoring techniques, during labor. Study Design Women in term labor were simultaneously monitored with the intrauterine pressure catheter, the external tocodynamometer, and the electrohysterograph. Postpartum, these women fil...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical Publishers
2018
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6138467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30250758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1669409 |
_version_ | 1783355349425717248 |
---|---|
author | Thijssen, Kirsten M. J. Vlemminx, Marion W. C. Westerhuis, Michelle E. M. H. Dieleman, Jeanne P. Van der Hout-Van der Jagt, M. Beatrijs Oei, S. Guid |
author_facet | Thijssen, Kirsten M. J. Vlemminx, Marion W. C. Westerhuis, Michelle E. M. H. Dieleman, Jeanne P. Van der Hout-Van der Jagt, M. Beatrijs Oei, S. Guid |
author_sort | Thijssen, Kirsten M. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To evaluate preferences from patients and users on 3 uterine monitoring techniques, during labor. Study Design Women in term labor were simultaneously monitored with the intrauterine pressure catheter, the external tocodynamometer, and the electrohysterograph. Postpartum, these women filled out a questionnaire evaluating their preferences and important aspects. Nurses completed a questionnaire evaluating users' preferences. Results Of all 52 participating women, 80.8% preferred the electrohysterograph, 17.3% the intrauterine pressure catheter and 1.9% the external tocodynamometer. For these women, the electrohysterograph scored best regarding application and presence during labor ( p < 0.001). Most important aspects were “least likely to harm” and “least discomfort”. Of 57 nurses, 40.4% preferred the electrohysterograph, 35.1% the external tocodynamometer, and 24.6% had no preference, or replied that their preference is subject to situation and patient. Conclusion Patients prefer the electrohysterograph over the external tocodynamometer and the intrauterine pressure catheter, while healthcare providers report ambiguous results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6138467 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Thieme Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61384672018-09-24 Uterine Monitoring Techniques from Patients' and Users' Perspectives Thijssen, Kirsten M. J. Vlemminx, Marion W. C. Westerhuis, Michelle E. M. H. Dieleman, Jeanne P. Van der Hout-Van der Jagt, M. Beatrijs Oei, S. Guid AJP Rep Objective To evaluate preferences from patients and users on 3 uterine monitoring techniques, during labor. Study Design Women in term labor were simultaneously monitored with the intrauterine pressure catheter, the external tocodynamometer, and the electrohysterograph. Postpartum, these women filled out a questionnaire evaluating their preferences and important aspects. Nurses completed a questionnaire evaluating users' preferences. Results Of all 52 participating women, 80.8% preferred the electrohysterograph, 17.3% the intrauterine pressure catheter and 1.9% the external tocodynamometer. For these women, the electrohysterograph scored best regarding application and presence during labor ( p < 0.001). Most important aspects were “least likely to harm” and “least discomfort”. Of 57 nurses, 40.4% preferred the electrohysterograph, 35.1% the external tocodynamometer, and 24.6% had no preference, or replied that their preference is subject to situation and patient. Conclusion Patients prefer the electrohysterograph over the external tocodynamometer and the intrauterine pressure catheter, while healthcare providers report ambiguous results. Thieme Medical Publishers 2018-07 2018-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6138467/ /pubmed/30250758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1669409 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Thijssen, Kirsten M. J. Vlemminx, Marion W. C. Westerhuis, Michelle E. M. H. Dieleman, Jeanne P. Van der Hout-Van der Jagt, M. Beatrijs Oei, S. Guid Uterine Monitoring Techniques from Patients' and Users' Perspectives |
title | Uterine Monitoring Techniques from Patients' and Users' Perspectives |
title_full | Uterine Monitoring Techniques from Patients' and Users' Perspectives |
title_fullStr | Uterine Monitoring Techniques from Patients' and Users' Perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed | Uterine Monitoring Techniques from Patients' and Users' Perspectives |
title_short | Uterine Monitoring Techniques from Patients' and Users' Perspectives |
title_sort | uterine monitoring techniques from patients' and users' perspectives |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6138467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30250758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1669409 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thijssenkirstenmj uterinemonitoringtechniquesfrompatientsandusersperspectives AT vlemminxmarionwc uterinemonitoringtechniquesfrompatientsandusersperspectives AT westerhuismichelleemh uterinemonitoringtechniquesfrompatientsandusersperspectives AT dielemanjeannep uterinemonitoringtechniquesfrompatientsandusersperspectives AT vanderhoutvanderjagtmbeatrijs uterinemonitoringtechniquesfrompatientsandusersperspectives AT oeisguid uterinemonitoringtechniquesfrompatientsandusersperspectives |