Cargando…

A systematic literature review of the human skin microbiome as biomarker for dermatological drug development

AIMS: To explore the potential of the skin microbiome as biomarker in six dermatological conditions: atopic dermatitis (AD), acne vulgaris (AV), psoriasis vulgaris (PV), hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), seborrhoeic dermatitis/pityriasis capitis (SD/PC) and ulcus cruris (UC). METHODS: A systematic lite...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niemeyer ‐ van der Kolk, T., van der Wall, H. E. C., Balmforth, C., Van Doorn, M. B. A., Rissmann, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6138488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29877593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13662
_version_ 1783355351520772096
author Niemeyer ‐ van der Kolk, T.
van der Wall, H. E. C.
Balmforth, C.
Van Doorn, M. B. A.
Rissmann, R.
author_facet Niemeyer ‐ van der Kolk, T.
van der Wall, H. E. C.
Balmforth, C.
Van Doorn, M. B. A.
Rissmann, R.
author_sort Niemeyer ‐ van der Kolk, T.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To explore the potential of the skin microbiome as biomarker in six dermatological conditions: atopic dermatitis (AD), acne vulgaris (AV), psoriasis vulgaris (PV), hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), seborrhoeic dermatitis/pityriasis capitis (SD/PC) and ulcus cruris (UC). METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Two investigators independently reviewed the included studies and ranked the suitability microbiome implementation for early phase clinical studies in an adapted GRADE method. RESULTS: In total, 841 papers were identified and after screening of titles and abstracts for eligibility we identified 42 manuscripts that could be included in the review. Eleven studies were included for AD, five for AV, 10 for PV, two for HS, four for SD and 10 for UC. For AD and AV, multiple studies report the relationship between the skin microbiome, disease severity and clinical response to treatment. This is currently lacking for the remaining conditions. CONCLUSION: For two indications – AD and AV – there is preliminary evidence to support implementation of the skin microbiome as biomarkers in early phase clinical trials. For PV, UC, SD and HS there is insufficient evidence from the literature. More microbiome‐directed prospective studies studying the effect of current treatments on the microbiome with special attention for patient meta‐data, sampling methods and analysis methods are needed to draw more substantial conclusions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6138488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61384882018-09-20 A systematic literature review of the human skin microbiome as biomarker for dermatological drug development Niemeyer ‐ van der Kolk, T. van der Wall, H. E. C. Balmforth, C. Van Doorn, M. B. A. Rissmann, R. Br J Clin Pharmacol Systematic Review and Meta–Analysis AIMS: To explore the potential of the skin microbiome as biomarker in six dermatological conditions: atopic dermatitis (AD), acne vulgaris (AV), psoriasis vulgaris (PV), hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), seborrhoeic dermatitis/pityriasis capitis (SD/PC) and ulcus cruris (UC). METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Two investigators independently reviewed the included studies and ranked the suitability microbiome implementation for early phase clinical studies in an adapted GRADE method. RESULTS: In total, 841 papers were identified and after screening of titles and abstracts for eligibility we identified 42 manuscripts that could be included in the review. Eleven studies were included for AD, five for AV, 10 for PV, two for HS, four for SD and 10 for UC. For AD and AV, multiple studies report the relationship between the skin microbiome, disease severity and clinical response to treatment. This is currently lacking for the remaining conditions. CONCLUSION: For two indications – AD and AV – there is preliminary evidence to support implementation of the skin microbiome as biomarkers in early phase clinical trials. For PV, UC, SD and HS there is insufficient evidence from the literature. More microbiome‐directed prospective studies studying the effect of current treatments on the microbiome with special attention for patient meta‐data, sampling methods and analysis methods are needed to draw more substantial conclusions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-07-19 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6138488/ /pubmed/29877593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13662 Text en © 2018 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Systematic Review and Meta–Analysis
Niemeyer ‐ van der Kolk, T.
van der Wall, H. E. C.
Balmforth, C.
Van Doorn, M. B. A.
Rissmann, R.
A systematic literature review of the human skin microbiome as biomarker for dermatological drug development
title A systematic literature review of the human skin microbiome as biomarker for dermatological drug development
title_full A systematic literature review of the human skin microbiome as biomarker for dermatological drug development
title_fullStr A systematic literature review of the human skin microbiome as biomarker for dermatological drug development
title_full_unstemmed A systematic literature review of the human skin microbiome as biomarker for dermatological drug development
title_short A systematic literature review of the human skin microbiome as biomarker for dermatological drug development
title_sort systematic literature review of the human skin microbiome as biomarker for dermatological drug development
topic Systematic Review and Meta–Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6138488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29877593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13662
work_keys_str_mv AT niemeyervanderkolkt asystematicliteraturereviewofthehumanskinmicrobiomeasbiomarkerfordermatologicaldrugdevelopment
AT vanderwallhec asystematicliteraturereviewofthehumanskinmicrobiomeasbiomarkerfordermatologicaldrugdevelopment
AT balmforthc asystematicliteraturereviewofthehumanskinmicrobiomeasbiomarkerfordermatologicaldrugdevelopment
AT vandoornmba asystematicliteraturereviewofthehumanskinmicrobiomeasbiomarkerfordermatologicaldrugdevelopment
AT rissmannr asystematicliteraturereviewofthehumanskinmicrobiomeasbiomarkerfordermatologicaldrugdevelopment
AT niemeyervanderkolkt systematicliteraturereviewofthehumanskinmicrobiomeasbiomarkerfordermatologicaldrugdevelopment
AT vanderwallhec systematicliteraturereviewofthehumanskinmicrobiomeasbiomarkerfordermatologicaldrugdevelopment
AT balmforthc systematicliteraturereviewofthehumanskinmicrobiomeasbiomarkerfordermatologicaldrugdevelopment
AT vandoornmba systematicliteraturereviewofthehumanskinmicrobiomeasbiomarkerfordermatologicaldrugdevelopment
AT rissmannr systematicliteraturereviewofthehumanskinmicrobiomeasbiomarkerfordermatologicaldrugdevelopment