Cargando…
Differences in the intrinsic chondrogenic potential of equine umbilical cord matrix and cord blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells for cartilage regeneration
Umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (UCB-MSCs) and umbilical cord matrix MSCs (UCM-MSCs) have chondrogenic potential and are alternative sources to standard surgically derived bone marrow or adipose tissue collection for cartilage engineering. However, the majority of comparative stu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6138671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30217993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28164-9 |
_version_ | 1783355375128412160 |
---|---|
author | Rakic, Rodolphe Bourdon, Bastien Demoor, Magali Maddens, Stéphane Saulnier, Nathalie Galéra, Philippe |
author_facet | Rakic, Rodolphe Bourdon, Bastien Demoor, Magali Maddens, Stéphane Saulnier, Nathalie Galéra, Philippe |
author_sort | Rakic, Rodolphe |
collection | PubMed |
description | Umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (UCB-MSCs) and umbilical cord matrix MSCs (UCM-MSCs) have chondrogenic potential and are alternative sources to standard surgically derived bone marrow or adipose tissue collection for cartilage engineering. However, the majority of comparative studies explore neonatal MSCs potential only on ISCT benchmark assays accounting for some bias in the reproducibility between in vitro and in clinical studies. Therefore, we characterized equine UCB-MSCs and UCM-MSCs and investigated with particular attention their chondrogenesis potential in 3D culture with BMP-2 + TGF-ß1 in normoxia or hypoxia. We carried out an exhaustive characterization of the extracellular matrix generated by both these two types of MSCs after the induction of chondrogenesis through evaluation of hyaline cartilage, hypertrophic and osteogenic markers (mRNA, protein and histology levels). Some differences in hypoxia sensitivity and chondrogenesis were observed. UCB-MSCs differentiated into chondrocytes express an abundant, dense and a hyaline-like cartilage matrix. By contrast, despite their expression of cartilage markers, UCM-MSCs failed to express a relevant cartilage matrix after chondrogenic induction. Both MSCs types also displayed intrinsic differences at their undifferentiated basal status, UCB-MSCs expressing higher levels of chondrogenic markers whereas UCM-MSCs synthesizing higher amounts of osteogenic markers. Our results suggest that UCB-MSCs should be preferred for ex-vivo horse cartilage engineering. How those results should be translated to in vivo direct cartilage regeneration remains to be determined through dedicated study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6138671 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61386712018-09-15 Differences in the intrinsic chondrogenic potential of equine umbilical cord matrix and cord blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells for cartilage regeneration Rakic, Rodolphe Bourdon, Bastien Demoor, Magali Maddens, Stéphane Saulnier, Nathalie Galéra, Philippe Sci Rep Article Umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (UCB-MSCs) and umbilical cord matrix MSCs (UCM-MSCs) have chondrogenic potential and are alternative sources to standard surgically derived bone marrow or adipose tissue collection for cartilage engineering. However, the majority of comparative studies explore neonatal MSCs potential only on ISCT benchmark assays accounting for some bias in the reproducibility between in vitro and in clinical studies. Therefore, we characterized equine UCB-MSCs and UCM-MSCs and investigated with particular attention their chondrogenesis potential in 3D culture with BMP-2 + TGF-ß1 in normoxia or hypoxia. We carried out an exhaustive characterization of the extracellular matrix generated by both these two types of MSCs after the induction of chondrogenesis through evaluation of hyaline cartilage, hypertrophic and osteogenic markers (mRNA, protein and histology levels). Some differences in hypoxia sensitivity and chondrogenesis were observed. UCB-MSCs differentiated into chondrocytes express an abundant, dense and a hyaline-like cartilage matrix. By contrast, despite their expression of cartilage markers, UCM-MSCs failed to express a relevant cartilage matrix after chondrogenic induction. Both MSCs types also displayed intrinsic differences at their undifferentiated basal status, UCB-MSCs expressing higher levels of chondrogenic markers whereas UCM-MSCs synthesizing higher amounts of osteogenic markers. Our results suggest that UCB-MSCs should be preferred for ex-vivo horse cartilage engineering. How those results should be translated to in vivo direct cartilage regeneration remains to be determined through dedicated study. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6138671/ /pubmed/30217993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28164-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Rakic, Rodolphe Bourdon, Bastien Demoor, Magali Maddens, Stéphane Saulnier, Nathalie Galéra, Philippe Differences in the intrinsic chondrogenic potential of equine umbilical cord matrix and cord blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells for cartilage regeneration |
title | Differences in the intrinsic chondrogenic potential of equine umbilical cord matrix and cord blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells for cartilage regeneration |
title_full | Differences in the intrinsic chondrogenic potential of equine umbilical cord matrix and cord blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells for cartilage regeneration |
title_fullStr | Differences in the intrinsic chondrogenic potential of equine umbilical cord matrix and cord blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells for cartilage regeneration |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in the intrinsic chondrogenic potential of equine umbilical cord matrix and cord blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells for cartilage regeneration |
title_short | Differences in the intrinsic chondrogenic potential of equine umbilical cord matrix and cord blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells for cartilage regeneration |
title_sort | differences in the intrinsic chondrogenic potential of equine umbilical cord matrix and cord blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells for cartilage regeneration |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6138671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30217993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28164-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rakicrodolphe differencesintheintrinsicchondrogenicpotentialofequineumbilicalcordmatrixandcordbloodmesenchymalstromalstemcellsforcartilageregeneration AT bourdonbastien differencesintheintrinsicchondrogenicpotentialofequineumbilicalcordmatrixandcordbloodmesenchymalstromalstemcellsforcartilageregeneration AT demoormagali differencesintheintrinsicchondrogenicpotentialofequineumbilicalcordmatrixandcordbloodmesenchymalstromalstemcellsforcartilageregeneration AT maddensstephane differencesintheintrinsicchondrogenicpotentialofequineumbilicalcordmatrixandcordbloodmesenchymalstromalstemcellsforcartilageregeneration AT saulniernathalie differencesintheintrinsicchondrogenicpotentialofequineumbilicalcordmatrixandcordbloodmesenchymalstromalstemcellsforcartilageregeneration AT galeraphilippe differencesintheintrinsicchondrogenicpotentialofequineumbilicalcordmatrixandcordbloodmesenchymalstromalstemcellsforcartilageregeneration |