Cargando…

Differences in the intrinsic chondrogenic potential of equine umbilical cord matrix and cord blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells for cartilage regeneration

Umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (UCB-MSCs) and umbilical cord matrix MSCs (UCM-MSCs) have chondrogenic potential and are alternative sources to standard surgically derived bone marrow or adipose tissue collection for cartilage engineering. However, the majority of comparative stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rakic, Rodolphe, Bourdon, Bastien, Demoor, Magali, Maddens, Stéphane, Saulnier, Nathalie, Galéra, Philippe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6138671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30217993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28164-9
_version_ 1783355375128412160
author Rakic, Rodolphe
Bourdon, Bastien
Demoor, Magali
Maddens, Stéphane
Saulnier, Nathalie
Galéra, Philippe
author_facet Rakic, Rodolphe
Bourdon, Bastien
Demoor, Magali
Maddens, Stéphane
Saulnier, Nathalie
Galéra, Philippe
author_sort Rakic, Rodolphe
collection PubMed
description Umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (UCB-MSCs) and umbilical cord matrix MSCs (UCM-MSCs) have chondrogenic potential and are alternative sources to standard surgically derived bone marrow or adipose tissue collection for cartilage engineering. However, the majority of comparative studies explore neonatal MSCs potential only on ISCT benchmark assays accounting for some bias in the reproducibility between in vitro and in clinical studies. Therefore, we characterized equine UCB-MSCs and UCM-MSCs and investigated with particular attention their chondrogenesis potential in 3D culture with BMP-2 + TGF-ß1 in normoxia or hypoxia. We carried out an exhaustive characterization of the extracellular matrix generated by both these two types of MSCs after the induction of chondrogenesis through evaluation of hyaline cartilage, hypertrophic and osteogenic markers (mRNA, protein and histology levels). Some differences in hypoxia sensitivity and chondrogenesis were observed. UCB-MSCs differentiated into chondrocytes express an abundant, dense and a hyaline-like cartilage matrix. By contrast, despite their expression of cartilage markers, UCM-MSCs failed to express a relevant cartilage matrix after chondrogenic induction. Both MSCs types also displayed intrinsic differences at their undifferentiated basal status, UCB-MSCs expressing higher levels of chondrogenic markers whereas UCM-MSCs synthesizing higher amounts of osteogenic markers. Our results suggest that UCB-MSCs should be preferred for ex-vivo horse cartilage engineering. How those results should be translated to in vivo direct cartilage regeneration remains to be determined through dedicated study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6138671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61386712018-09-15 Differences in the intrinsic chondrogenic potential of equine umbilical cord matrix and cord blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells for cartilage regeneration Rakic, Rodolphe Bourdon, Bastien Demoor, Magali Maddens, Stéphane Saulnier, Nathalie Galéra, Philippe Sci Rep Article Umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (UCB-MSCs) and umbilical cord matrix MSCs (UCM-MSCs) have chondrogenic potential and are alternative sources to standard surgically derived bone marrow or adipose tissue collection for cartilage engineering. However, the majority of comparative studies explore neonatal MSCs potential only on ISCT benchmark assays accounting for some bias in the reproducibility between in vitro and in clinical studies. Therefore, we characterized equine UCB-MSCs and UCM-MSCs and investigated with particular attention their chondrogenesis potential in 3D culture with BMP-2 + TGF-ß1 in normoxia or hypoxia. We carried out an exhaustive characterization of the extracellular matrix generated by both these two types of MSCs after the induction of chondrogenesis through evaluation of hyaline cartilage, hypertrophic and osteogenic markers (mRNA, protein and histology levels). Some differences in hypoxia sensitivity and chondrogenesis were observed. UCB-MSCs differentiated into chondrocytes express an abundant, dense and a hyaline-like cartilage matrix. By contrast, despite their expression of cartilage markers, UCM-MSCs failed to express a relevant cartilage matrix after chondrogenic induction. Both MSCs types also displayed intrinsic differences at their undifferentiated basal status, UCB-MSCs expressing higher levels of chondrogenic markers whereas UCM-MSCs synthesizing higher amounts of osteogenic markers. Our results suggest that UCB-MSCs should be preferred for ex-vivo horse cartilage engineering. How those results should be translated to in vivo direct cartilage regeneration remains to be determined through dedicated study. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6138671/ /pubmed/30217993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28164-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Rakic, Rodolphe
Bourdon, Bastien
Demoor, Magali
Maddens, Stéphane
Saulnier, Nathalie
Galéra, Philippe
Differences in the intrinsic chondrogenic potential of equine umbilical cord matrix and cord blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells for cartilage regeneration
title Differences in the intrinsic chondrogenic potential of equine umbilical cord matrix and cord blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells for cartilage regeneration
title_full Differences in the intrinsic chondrogenic potential of equine umbilical cord matrix and cord blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells for cartilage regeneration
title_fullStr Differences in the intrinsic chondrogenic potential of equine umbilical cord matrix and cord blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells for cartilage regeneration
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the intrinsic chondrogenic potential of equine umbilical cord matrix and cord blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells for cartilage regeneration
title_short Differences in the intrinsic chondrogenic potential of equine umbilical cord matrix and cord blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells for cartilage regeneration
title_sort differences in the intrinsic chondrogenic potential of equine umbilical cord matrix and cord blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells for cartilage regeneration
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6138671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30217993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28164-9
work_keys_str_mv AT rakicrodolphe differencesintheintrinsicchondrogenicpotentialofequineumbilicalcordmatrixandcordbloodmesenchymalstromalstemcellsforcartilageregeneration
AT bourdonbastien differencesintheintrinsicchondrogenicpotentialofequineumbilicalcordmatrixandcordbloodmesenchymalstromalstemcellsforcartilageregeneration
AT demoormagali differencesintheintrinsicchondrogenicpotentialofequineumbilicalcordmatrixandcordbloodmesenchymalstromalstemcellsforcartilageregeneration
AT maddensstephane differencesintheintrinsicchondrogenicpotentialofequineumbilicalcordmatrixandcordbloodmesenchymalstromalstemcellsforcartilageregeneration
AT saulniernathalie differencesintheintrinsicchondrogenicpotentialofequineumbilicalcordmatrixandcordbloodmesenchymalstromalstemcellsforcartilageregeneration
AT galeraphilippe differencesintheintrinsicchondrogenicpotentialofequineumbilicalcordmatrixandcordbloodmesenchymalstromalstemcellsforcartilageregeneration