Cargando…
A phase II randomized trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the pharynx or larynx
BACKGROUND: To clarify the effect of induction chemotherapy (ICT) in patients with advanced pharyngeal and laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (PLSCC) treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). METHODS: Patients with treatment-naïve nonmetastatic advanced PLSCC were stratified according to dise...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Chang Gung University
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6138767/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29866601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2018.04.003 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: To clarify the effect of induction chemotherapy (ICT) in patients with advanced pharyngeal and laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (PLSCC) treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). METHODS: Patients with treatment-naïve nonmetastatic advanced PLSCC were stratified according to disease stage (III or IV) and resectability before being randomized to either a ICT/CCRT or CCRT arm. A cisplatin/tegafur-uracil/leucovorin regimen was administered during ICT and CCRT. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: We enrolled 151 patients during December 2006 to February 2011. The median follow-up of surviving patients was 54.5 months. The ICT/CCRT arm included more patients with hypopharynx cancer (57.1% vs 40.5%, p = 0.09) and N2 or N3 diseases (85.7% vs 74.4%, p = 0.02). In the ICT/CCRT and CCRT arms, the 5-year OS was 48.1% and 53.2% (p = 0.45); progression-free survival (PFS) was 31.8% and 55.6% (p = 0.015); and locoregional control (LRC) was 37.7% and 56.2% (p = 0.026), respectively. The adverse events and compliance to radiotherapy were similar. However, the proportion of patients receiving a total dose of cisplatin during CCRT <150 mg/m(2) was higher in the ICT/CCRT arm (46.8% vs 16.2%; p = 0.000) and independently predicted poorer PFS and LRC in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: OS did not vary between the ICT/CCRT and CCRT arms. However, poorer compliance to CCRT and inferior LRC and PFS were observed in the ICT/CCRT arm. Optimizing the therapeutic ratio in both ICT and CCRT settings are necessary for developing a sequential strategy for patients with advanced-stage PLSCC. |
---|