Cargando…

Sensitivity and specificity of using trial-of-antibiotics versus sputum mycobacteriology for diagnosis of tuberculosis: protocol for a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND: Suboptimal diagnostics for pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) drives use of ‘trial-of-antibiotics (non-tuberculosis)’ in an attempt to distinguish PTB patients from those with bacterial lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). The underlying assumption—that patients with LRTI will report ‘res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Divala, Titus H., Fielding, Katherine L., Nliwasa, Marriott, Sloan, Derek J., Gupta-Wright, Ankur, Corbett, Elizabeth L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6138901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30219089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0806-6
_version_ 1783355422519853056
author Divala, Titus H.
Fielding, Katherine L.
Nliwasa, Marriott
Sloan, Derek J.
Gupta-Wright, Ankur
Corbett, Elizabeth L.
author_facet Divala, Titus H.
Fielding, Katherine L.
Nliwasa, Marriott
Sloan, Derek J.
Gupta-Wright, Ankur
Corbett, Elizabeth L.
author_sort Divala, Titus H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Suboptimal diagnostics for pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) drives use of ‘trial-of-antibiotics (non-tuberculosis)’ in an attempt to distinguish PTB patients from those with bacterial lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). The underlying assumption—that patients with LRTI will report ‘response’ to broad-spectrum antibiotics, while those with PTB will not—has minimal evidence base for such a widely used intervention. Numerous potential causes of misclassification include bacterial super-infection of active PTB, placebo effect, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The main aim of this systematic review is to collate available evidence on the performance of trial-of-antibiotics as a diagnostic test and to explore the timing, interpretation, and decision-making process. METHODS: We will search MEDLINE, Embase, and Global Health using the Ovid platform for published studies that recruited adults being investigated for PTB, performed trial-of-antibiotics accompanied by mycobacteriological investigations, and reported both diagnostic test outcomes at the individual level. Following article selection, two authors will independently review titles and abstracts against eligibility criteria then perform full-text screening and extraction into a spreadsheet. We will conduct a risk of bias assessment at the level of the study using QUADAS-2 (University of Bristol) tool that assesses diagnostic evaluation work in four domains: (1) patient selection, (2) the index test, (3) the reference standard, and (4) patient flow and timing of tests. We will perform a narrative synthesis and, where possible, meta-analyses addressing our primary outcome. Our protocol adheres to the standards recommended by the PRISMA-P. DISCUSSION: Pooling all available evidence on the accuracy, approach, and interpretation of results of trial-of-antibiotics in the context of PTB diagnosis will meet an urgent need, considering the widespread utilisation and potential for antimicrobial resistance. We therefore believe that our findings will have impact on policy and that they will inform the design of future detailed investigations into this important diagnostic approach. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017083915 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13643-018-0806-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6138901
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61389012018-09-15 Sensitivity and specificity of using trial-of-antibiotics versus sputum mycobacteriology for diagnosis of tuberculosis: protocol for a systematic literature review Divala, Titus H. Fielding, Katherine L. Nliwasa, Marriott Sloan, Derek J. Gupta-Wright, Ankur Corbett, Elizabeth L. Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Suboptimal diagnostics for pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) drives use of ‘trial-of-antibiotics (non-tuberculosis)’ in an attempt to distinguish PTB patients from those with bacterial lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). The underlying assumption—that patients with LRTI will report ‘response’ to broad-spectrum antibiotics, while those with PTB will not—has minimal evidence base for such a widely used intervention. Numerous potential causes of misclassification include bacterial super-infection of active PTB, placebo effect, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The main aim of this systematic review is to collate available evidence on the performance of trial-of-antibiotics as a diagnostic test and to explore the timing, interpretation, and decision-making process. METHODS: We will search MEDLINE, Embase, and Global Health using the Ovid platform for published studies that recruited adults being investigated for PTB, performed trial-of-antibiotics accompanied by mycobacteriological investigations, and reported both diagnostic test outcomes at the individual level. Following article selection, two authors will independently review titles and abstracts against eligibility criteria then perform full-text screening and extraction into a spreadsheet. We will conduct a risk of bias assessment at the level of the study using QUADAS-2 (University of Bristol) tool that assesses diagnostic evaluation work in four domains: (1) patient selection, (2) the index test, (3) the reference standard, and (4) patient flow and timing of tests. We will perform a narrative synthesis and, where possible, meta-analyses addressing our primary outcome. Our protocol adheres to the standards recommended by the PRISMA-P. DISCUSSION: Pooling all available evidence on the accuracy, approach, and interpretation of results of trial-of-antibiotics in the context of PTB diagnosis will meet an urgent need, considering the widespread utilisation and potential for antimicrobial resistance. We therefore believe that our findings will have impact on policy and that they will inform the design of future detailed investigations into this important diagnostic approach. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017083915 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13643-018-0806-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6138901/ /pubmed/30219089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0806-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Divala, Titus H.
Fielding, Katherine L.
Nliwasa, Marriott
Sloan, Derek J.
Gupta-Wright, Ankur
Corbett, Elizabeth L.
Sensitivity and specificity of using trial-of-antibiotics versus sputum mycobacteriology for diagnosis of tuberculosis: protocol for a systematic literature review
title Sensitivity and specificity of using trial-of-antibiotics versus sputum mycobacteriology for diagnosis of tuberculosis: protocol for a systematic literature review
title_full Sensitivity and specificity of using trial-of-antibiotics versus sputum mycobacteriology for diagnosis of tuberculosis: protocol for a systematic literature review
title_fullStr Sensitivity and specificity of using trial-of-antibiotics versus sputum mycobacteriology for diagnosis of tuberculosis: protocol for a systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity and specificity of using trial-of-antibiotics versus sputum mycobacteriology for diagnosis of tuberculosis: protocol for a systematic literature review
title_short Sensitivity and specificity of using trial-of-antibiotics versus sputum mycobacteriology for diagnosis of tuberculosis: protocol for a systematic literature review
title_sort sensitivity and specificity of using trial-of-antibiotics versus sputum mycobacteriology for diagnosis of tuberculosis: protocol for a systematic literature review
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6138901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30219089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0806-6
work_keys_str_mv AT divalatitush sensitivityandspecificityofusingtrialofantibioticsversussputummycobacteriologyfordiagnosisoftuberculosisprotocolforasystematicliteraturereview
AT fieldingkatherinel sensitivityandspecificityofusingtrialofantibioticsversussputummycobacteriologyfordiagnosisoftuberculosisprotocolforasystematicliteraturereview
AT nliwasamarriott sensitivityandspecificityofusingtrialofantibioticsversussputummycobacteriologyfordiagnosisoftuberculosisprotocolforasystematicliteraturereview
AT sloanderekj sensitivityandspecificityofusingtrialofantibioticsversussputummycobacteriologyfordiagnosisoftuberculosisprotocolforasystematicliteraturereview
AT guptawrightankur sensitivityandspecificityofusingtrialofantibioticsversussputummycobacteriologyfordiagnosisoftuberculosisprotocolforasystematicliteraturereview
AT corbettelizabethl sensitivityandspecificityofusingtrialofantibioticsversussputummycobacteriologyfordiagnosisoftuberculosisprotocolforasystematicliteraturereview