Cargando…
Prognostic value of EGFR and KRAS in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of EGFR and KRAS mutations in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been reported. However, conflicting results were reported in these studies. The effect of mutations in these two genes in resected NSCLC remains controversial. METHODS: We searched Internet...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6138965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30237741 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S167578 |
_version_ | 1783355437897220096 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Shi-Ming Zhu, Qing-Ge Ding, Xiao-Xiao Lin, Song Zhao, Jing Guan, Lei Li, Ting He, Bing Zhang, Hu-Qin |
author_facet | Zhang, Shi-Ming Zhu, Qing-Ge Ding, Xiao-Xiao Lin, Song Zhao, Jing Guan, Lei Li, Ting He, Bing Zhang, Hu-Qin |
author_sort | Zhang, Shi-Ming |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of EGFR and KRAS mutations in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been reported. However, conflicting results were reported in these studies. The effect of mutations in these two genes in resected NSCLC remains controversial. METHODS: We searched Internet databases for studies reporting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in resected NSCLC patients with EGFR or KRAS mutations. A meta-analysis calculating the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for DFS and OS was used to measure the association of EGFR or KRAS mutations with the prognosis of patients after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 9,635 patients from 32 studies were included in this analysis. The combined HR for EGFR mutations on DFS was 0.77 (95% CI 0.66–0.90, p=0.001) and on OS was 0.72 (95% CI 0.66–0.80, p<0.00001). In addition, the combined HR for KRAS mutations on DFS was 1.5 (95% CI 1.15–1.96, p=0.002) and on OS was 1.49 (95% CI 1.28–1.73, p<0.00001). Sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and bias analysis proved the stability of the results. CONCLUSION: The analysis showed that EGFR mutations were significantly associated with DFS and OS. These findings indicated that surgically treated NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations were inclined to exhibit a prolonged DFS and OS. In addition, the results indicated that KRAS mutations predicted worse DFS and OS in patients with resected NSCLC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6138965 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61389652018-09-20 Prognostic value of EGFR and KRAS in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang, Shi-Ming Zhu, Qing-Ge Ding, Xiao-Xiao Lin, Song Zhao, Jing Guan, Lei Li, Ting He, Bing Zhang, Hu-Qin Cancer Manag Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of EGFR and KRAS mutations in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been reported. However, conflicting results were reported in these studies. The effect of mutations in these two genes in resected NSCLC remains controversial. METHODS: We searched Internet databases for studies reporting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in resected NSCLC patients with EGFR or KRAS mutations. A meta-analysis calculating the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for DFS and OS was used to measure the association of EGFR or KRAS mutations with the prognosis of patients after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 9,635 patients from 32 studies were included in this analysis. The combined HR for EGFR mutations on DFS was 0.77 (95% CI 0.66–0.90, p=0.001) and on OS was 0.72 (95% CI 0.66–0.80, p<0.00001). In addition, the combined HR for KRAS mutations on DFS was 1.5 (95% CI 1.15–1.96, p=0.002) and on OS was 1.49 (95% CI 1.28–1.73, p<0.00001). Sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and bias analysis proved the stability of the results. CONCLUSION: The analysis showed that EGFR mutations were significantly associated with DFS and OS. These findings indicated that surgically treated NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations were inclined to exhibit a prolonged DFS and OS. In addition, the results indicated that KRAS mutations predicted worse DFS and OS in patients with resected NSCLC. Dove Medical Press 2018-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6138965/ /pubmed/30237741 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S167578 Text en © 2018 Zhang et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Zhang, Shi-Ming Zhu, Qing-Ge Ding, Xiao-Xiao Lin, Song Zhao, Jing Guan, Lei Li, Ting He, Bing Zhang, Hu-Qin Prognostic value of EGFR and KRAS in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Prognostic value of EGFR and KRAS in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Prognostic value of EGFR and KRAS in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Prognostic value of EGFR and KRAS in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic value of EGFR and KRAS in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Prognostic value of EGFR and KRAS in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | prognostic value of egfr and kras in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6138965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30237741 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S167578 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangshiming prognosticvalueofegfrandkrasinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhuqingge prognosticvalueofegfrandkrasinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dingxiaoxiao prognosticvalueofegfrandkrasinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT linsong prognosticvalueofegfrandkrasinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhaojing prognosticvalueofegfrandkrasinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT guanlei prognosticvalueofegfrandkrasinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liting prognosticvalueofegfrandkrasinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hebing prognosticvalueofegfrandkrasinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhanghuqin prognosticvalueofegfrandkrasinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |