Cargando…

Prognostic value of EGFR and KRAS in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of EGFR and KRAS mutations in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been reported. However, conflicting results were reported in these studies. The effect of mutations in these two genes in resected NSCLC remains controversial. METHODS: We searched Internet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Shi-Ming, Zhu, Qing-Ge, Ding, Xiao-Xiao, Lin, Song, Zhao, Jing, Guan, Lei, Li, Ting, He, Bing, Zhang, Hu-Qin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6138965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30237741
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S167578
_version_ 1783355437897220096
author Zhang, Shi-Ming
Zhu, Qing-Ge
Ding, Xiao-Xiao
Lin, Song
Zhao, Jing
Guan, Lei
Li, Ting
He, Bing
Zhang, Hu-Qin
author_facet Zhang, Shi-Ming
Zhu, Qing-Ge
Ding, Xiao-Xiao
Lin, Song
Zhao, Jing
Guan, Lei
Li, Ting
He, Bing
Zhang, Hu-Qin
author_sort Zhang, Shi-Ming
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of EGFR and KRAS mutations in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been reported. However, conflicting results were reported in these studies. The effect of mutations in these two genes in resected NSCLC remains controversial. METHODS: We searched Internet databases for studies reporting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in resected NSCLC patients with EGFR or KRAS mutations. A meta-analysis calculating the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for DFS and OS was used to measure the association of EGFR or KRAS mutations with the prognosis of patients after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 9,635 patients from 32 studies were included in this analysis. The combined HR for EGFR mutations on DFS was 0.77 (95% CI 0.66–0.90, p=0.001) and on OS was 0.72 (95% CI 0.66–0.80, p<0.00001). In addition, the combined HR for KRAS mutations on DFS was 1.5 (95% CI 1.15–1.96, p=0.002) and on OS was 1.49 (95% CI 1.28–1.73, p<0.00001). Sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and bias analysis proved the stability of the results. CONCLUSION: The analysis showed that EGFR mutations were significantly associated with DFS and OS. These findings indicated that surgically treated NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations were inclined to exhibit a prolonged DFS and OS. In addition, the results indicated that KRAS mutations predicted worse DFS and OS in patients with resected NSCLC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6138965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61389652018-09-20 Prognostic value of EGFR and KRAS in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang, Shi-Ming Zhu, Qing-Ge Ding, Xiao-Xiao Lin, Song Zhao, Jing Guan, Lei Li, Ting He, Bing Zhang, Hu-Qin Cancer Manag Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of EGFR and KRAS mutations in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been reported. However, conflicting results were reported in these studies. The effect of mutations in these two genes in resected NSCLC remains controversial. METHODS: We searched Internet databases for studies reporting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in resected NSCLC patients with EGFR or KRAS mutations. A meta-analysis calculating the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for DFS and OS was used to measure the association of EGFR or KRAS mutations with the prognosis of patients after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 9,635 patients from 32 studies were included in this analysis. The combined HR for EGFR mutations on DFS was 0.77 (95% CI 0.66–0.90, p=0.001) and on OS was 0.72 (95% CI 0.66–0.80, p<0.00001). In addition, the combined HR for KRAS mutations on DFS was 1.5 (95% CI 1.15–1.96, p=0.002) and on OS was 1.49 (95% CI 1.28–1.73, p<0.00001). Sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and bias analysis proved the stability of the results. CONCLUSION: The analysis showed that EGFR mutations were significantly associated with DFS and OS. These findings indicated that surgically treated NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations were inclined to exhibit a prolonged DFS and OS. In addition, the results indicated that KRAS mutations predicted worse DFS and OS in patients with resected NSCLC. Dove Medical Press 2018-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6138965/ /pubmed/30237741 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S167578 Text en © 2018 Zhang et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Zhang, Shi-Ming
Zhu, Qing-Ge
Ding, Xiao-Xiao
Lin, Song
Zhao, Jing
Guan, Lei
Li, Ting
He, Bing
Zhang, Hu-Qin
Prognostic value of EGFR and KRAS in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Prognostic value of EGFR and KRAS in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Prognostic value of EGFR and KRAS in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Prognostic value of EGFR and KRAS in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of EGFR and KRAS in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Prognostic value of EGFR and KRAS in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort prognostic value of egfr and kras in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6138965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30237741
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S167578
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangshiming prognosticvalueofegfrandkrasinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhuqingge prognosticvalueofegfrandkrasinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dingxiaoxiao prognosticvalueofegfrandkrasinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT linsong prognosticvalueofegfrandkrasinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaojing prognosticvalueofegfrandkrasinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT guanlei prognosticvalueofegfrandkrasinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liting prognosticvalueofegfrandkrasinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hebing prognosticvalueofegfrandkrasinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhanghuqin prognosticvalueofegfrandkrasinresectednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis