Cargando…

The role of CAT in evaluating the response to treatment of patients with AECOPD

BACKGROUND: The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) questionnaire is a short patient-completed questionnaire, which is used to assess the health status of patients with stable COPD. However, whether it is a good tool to evaluate the response to treatment in acute exace...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Aiyuan, Zhou, Zijing, Peng, Yating, Zhao, Yiyang, Duan, Jiaxi, Chen, Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6138970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30237709
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S175085
_version_ 1783355439097839616
author Zhou, Aiyuan
Zhou, Zijing
Peng, Yating
Zhao, Yiyang
Duan, Jiaxi
Chen, Ping
author_facet Zhou, Aiyuan
Zhou, Zijing
Peng, Yating
Zhao, Yiyang
Duan, Jiaxi
Chen, Ping
author_sort Zhou, Aiyuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) questionnaire is a short patient-completed questionnaire, which is used to assess the health status of patients with stable COPD. However, whether it is a good tool to evaluate the response to treatment in acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) has been less studied. METHODS: The patients were assessed at two visits, at admission and on the seventh day. Anthropometric variables were collected at admission. CAT and lung function were measured twice at the above time points. At the second visit, the health status of the patients were divided into five groups based on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 to 5, which represents “much better,” “slightly better,” “no change,” “slightly worse,” and “much worse.” Responders were those who reported “much better” or “slightly better,” and nonresponders were those who claimed “no change,” “worse,” or “much worse.” RESULTS: In total, 225 patients were recruited. The average CAT score at admission was 24.82±7.41, which declined to 17.41±7.35 on the seventh day. There were 81.33% responders, whose improvement in CAT score (9.37±5.24) was much higher than that of the nonresponders (−1.36±4.35). A moderate correlation was observed between the changes in CAT score and improvement in FEV(1), FEV(1)%, and the length of hospital stay. There was a strong correlation between the changes in CAT score and health status. A 3.5-unit improvement in the CAT score, with highest area under the curve, was the cutoff to differentiate responders from nonresponders. CONCLUSION: The evolution of CAT scores during exacerbation can provide useful information to assess the health status of patients with AECOPD. A 3.5-unit improvement in CAT score is the best cutoff to differentiate between patients who have a response or no response to treatment, which offers a convenient and easy way for clinicians to monitor the health status of patients with an AECOPD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6138970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61389702018-09-20 The role of CAT in evaluating the response to treatment of patients with AECOPD Zhou, Aiyuan Zhou, Zijing Peng, Yating Zhao, Yiyang Duan, Jiaxi Chen, Ping Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) questionnaire is a short patient-completed questionnaire, which is used to assess the health status of patients with stable COPD. However, whether it is a good tool to evaluate the response to treatment in acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) has been less studied. METHODS: The patients were assessed at two visits, at admission and on the seventh day. Anthropometric variables were collected at admission. CAT and lung function were measured twice at the above time points. At the second visit, the health status of the patients were divided into five groups based on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 to 5, which represents “much better,” “slightly better,” “no change,” “slightly worse,” and “much worse.” Responders were those who reported “much better” or “slightly better,” and nonresponders were those who claimed “no change,” “worse,” or “much worse.” RESULTS: In total, 225 patients were recruited. The average CAT score at admission was 24.82±7.41, which declined to 17.41±7.35 on the seventh day. There were 81.33% responders, whose improvement in CAT score (9.37±5.24) was much higher than that of the nonresponders (−1.36±4.35). A moderate correlation was observed between the changes in CAT score and improvement in FEV(1), FEV(1)%, and the length of hospital stay. There was a strong correlation between the changes in CAT score and health status. A 3.5-unit improvement in the CAT score, with highest area under the curve, was the cutoff to differentiate responders from nonresponders. CONCLUSION: The evolution of CAT scores during exacerbation can provide useful information to assess the health status of patients with AECOPD. A 3.5-unit improvement in CAT score is the best cutoff to differentiate between patients who have a response or no response to treatment, which offers a convenient and easy way for clinicians to monitor the health status of patients with an AECOPD. Dove Medical Press 2018-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6138970/ /pubmed/30237709 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S175085 Text en © 2018 Zhou et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Zhou, Aiyuan
Zhou, Zijing
Peng, Yating
Zhao, Yiyang
Duan, Jiaxi
Chen, Ping
The role of CAT in evaluating the response to treatment of patients with AECOPD
title The role of CAT in evaluating the response to treatment of patients with AECOPD
title_full The role of CAT in evaluating the response to treatment of patients with AECOPD
title_fullStr The role of CAT in evaluating the response to treatment of patients with AECOPD
title_full_unstemmed The role of CAT in evaluating the response to treatment of patients with AECOPD
title_short The role of CAT in evaluating the response to treatment of patients with AECOPD
title_sort role of cat in evaluating the response to treatment of patients with aecopd
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6138970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30237709
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S175085
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouaiyuan theroleofcatinevaluatingtheresponsetotreatmentofpatientswithaecopd
AT zhouzijing theroleofcatinevaluatingtheresponsetotreatmentofpatientswithaecopd
AT pengyating theroleofcatinevaluatingtheresponsetotreatmentofpatientswithaecopd
AT zhaoyiyang theroleofcatinevaluatingtheresponsetotreatmentofpatientswithaecopd
AT duanjiaxi theroleofcatinevaluatingtheresponsetotreatmentofpatientswithaecopd
AT chenping theroleofcatinevaluatingtheresponsetotreatmentofpatientswithaecopd
AT zhouaiyuan roleofcatinevaluatingtheresponsetotreatmentofpatientswithaecopd
AT zhouzijing roleofcatinevaluatingtheresponsetotreatmentofpatientswithaecopd
AT pengyating roleofcatinevaluatingtheresponsetotreatmentofpatientswithaecopd
AT zhaoyiyang roleofcatinevaluatingtheresponsetotreatmentofpatientswithaecopd
AT duanjiaxi roleofcatinevaluatingtheresponsetotreatmentofpatientswithaecopd
AT chenping roleofcatinevaluatingtheresponsetotreatmentofpatientswithaecopd