Cargando…

Interventions to address social connectedness and loneliness for older adults: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Older adults are at risk for loneliness, and interventions to promote social connectedness are needed to directly address this problem. The nature of interventions aimed to affect the distinct, subjective concepts of loneliness/social connectedness has not been clearly described. The pur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Rourke, Hannah M., Collins, Laura, Sidani, Souraya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6139173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30219034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0897-x
_version_ 1783355467467063296
author O’Rourke, Hannah M.
Collins, Laura
Sidani, Souraya
author_facet O’Rourke, Hannah M.
Collins, Laura
Sidani, Souraya
author_sort O’Rourke, Hannah M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Older adults are at risk for loneliness, and interventions to promote social connectedness are needed to directly address this problem. The nature of interventions aimed to affect the distinct, subjective concepts of loneliness/social connectedness has not been clearly described. The purpose of this review was to map the literature on interventions and strategies to affect loneliness/social connectedness for older adults. METHODS: A comprehensive scoping review was conducted. Six electronic databases were searched from inception in July 2015, resulting in 5530 unique records. Standardized inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied, resulting in a set of 44 studies (reported in 54 articles) for further analysis. Data were extracted to describe the interventions and strategies, and the context of the included studies. Analytic techniques included calculating frequencies, manifest content analysis and meta-summary. RESULTS: Interventions were described or evaluated in 39 studies, and five studies described strategies to affect loneliness/social connectedness of older adults or their caregivers in a qualitative descriptive study. The studies were often conducted in the United States (38.6%) among community dwelling (54.5%), cognitively intact (31.8%), and female-majority (86.4%) samples. Few focused on non-white participants (4.5%). Strategies described most often were engaging in purposeful activity and maintaining contact with one’s social network. Of nine intervention types identified, the most frequently described were One-to-One Personal Contact and Group Activity. Authors held divergent views of why the same type of intervention might impact social connectedness, but social contact was the most frequently conceptualized influencing factor targeted, both within and across intervention types. CONCLUSIONS: Research to test the divergent theories of why interventions work is needed to advance understanding of intervention mechanisms. Innovative conceptualizations of intervention targets are needed, such as purposeful activity, that move beyond the current focus on the objective social network as a way to promote social connectedness for older adults. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-018-0897-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6139173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61391732018-09-20 Interventions to address social connectedness and loneliness for older adults: a scoping review O’Rourke, Hannah M. Collins, Laura Sidani, Souraya BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Older adults are at risk for loneliness, and interventions to promote social connectedness are needed to directly address this problem. The nature of interventions aimed to affect the distinct, subjective concepts of loneliness/social connectedness has not been clearly described. The purpose of this review was to map the literature on interventions and strategies to affect loneliness/social connectedness for older adults. METHODS: A comprehensive scoping review was conducted. Six electronic databases were searched from inception in July 2015, resulting in 5530 unique records. Standardized inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied, resulting in a set of 44 studies (reported in 54 articles) for further analysis. Data were extracted to describe the interventions and strategies, and the context of the included studies. Analytic techniques included calculating frequencies, manifest content analysis and meta-summary. RESULTS: Interventions were described or evaluated in 39 studies, and five studies described strategies to affect loneliness/social connectedness of older adults or their caregivers in a qualitative descriptive study. The studies were often conducted in the United States (38.6%) among community dwelling (54.5%), cognitively intact (31.8%), and female-majority (86.4%) samples. Few focused on non-white participants (4.5%). Strategies described most often were engaging in purposeful activity and maintaining contact with one’s social network. Of nine intervention types identified, the most frequently described were One-to-One Personal Contact and Group Activity. Authors held divergent views of why the same type of intervention might impact social connectedness, but social contact was the most frequently conceptualized influencing factor targeted, both within and across intervention types. CONCLUSIONS: Research to test the divergent theories of why interventions work is needed to advance understanding of intervention mechanisms. Innovative conceptualizations of intervention targets are needed, such as purposeful activity, that move beyond the current focus on the objective social network as a way to promote social connectedness for older adults. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-018-0897-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6139173/ /pubmed/30219034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0897-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
O’Rourke, Hannah M.
Collins, Laura
Sidani, Souraya
Interventions to address social connectedness and loneliness for older adults: a scoping review
title Interventions to address social connectedness and loneliness for older adults: a scoping review
title_full Interventions to address social connectedness and loneliness for older adults: a scoping review
title_fullStr Interventions to address social connectedness and loneliness for older adults: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Interventions to address social connectedness and loneliness for older adults: a scoping review
title_short Interventions to address social connectedness and loneliness for older adults: a scoping review
title_sort interventions to address social connectedness and loneliness for older adults: a scoping review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6139173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30219034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0897-x
work_keys_str_mv AT orourkehannahm interventionstoaddresssocialconnectednessandlonelinessforolderadultsascopingreview
AT collinslaura interventionstoaddresssocialconnectednessandlonelinessforolderadultsascopingreview
AT sidanisouraya interventionstoaddresssocialconnectednessandlonelinessforolderadultsascopingreview