Cargando…
Early cost-effectiveness of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) for second line treatment in advanced melanoma: a model-based economic evaluation
BACKGROUND: An emerging immunotherapy is infusion of tumor infiltrating Lymphocytes (TIL), with objective response rates of around 50% versus 19% for ipilimumab. As an Advanced Therapeutic Medicinal Products (ATMP), TIL is highly personalized and complex therapy. It requests substantial upfront inve...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6139174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30219040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4788-5 |
_version_ | 1783355467698798592 |
---|---|
author | Retèl, Valesca P. Steuten, Lotte M. G. Geukes Foppen, Marnix H. Mewes, Janne C. Lindenberg, Melanie A. Haanen, John B. A. G. van Harten, Wim H. |
author_facet | Retèl, Valesca P. Steuten, Lotte M. G. Geukes Foppen, Marnix H. Mewes, Janne C. Lindenberg, Melanie A. Haanen, John B. A. G. van Harten, Wim H. |
author_sort | Retèl, Valesca P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An emerging immunotherapy is infusion of tumor infiltrating Lymphocytes (TIL), with objective response rates of around 50% versus 19% for ipilimumab. As an Advanced Therapeutic Medicinal Products (ATMP), TIL is highly personalized and complex therapy. It requests substantial upfront investments from the hospital in: expensive lab-equipment, staff expertise and training, as well as extremely tight hospital logistics. Therefore, an early health economic modelling study, as part of a Coverage with Evidence Development (CED) program, was performed. METHODS: We used a Markov decision model to estimate the expected costs and outcomes (quality-adjusted life years; QALYs) for TIL versus ipilimumab for second line treatment in metastatic melanoma patients from a Dutch health care perspective over a life long time horizon. Three mutually exclusive health states (stable disease (responders)), progressive disease and death) were modelled. To inform further research prioritization, Value of Information (VOI) analysis was performed. RESULTS: TIL is expected to generate more QALYs compared to ipilimumab (0.45 versus 0.38 respectively) at lower incremental cost (presently €81,140 versus €94,705 respectively) resulting in a dominant ICER (less costly and more effective). Based on current information TIL is dominating ipilimumab and has a probability of 86% for being cost effective at a cost/QALY threshold of €80,000. The Expected Value of Perfect Information (EVPI) amounted to €3 M. CONCLUSIONS: TIL is expected to have the highest probability of being cost-effective in second line treatment for advanced melanoma compared to ipilimumab. To reduce decision uncertainty, a clinical trial investigating e.g. costs and survival seems most valuable. This is currently being undertaken as part of a CED program in the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, in collaboration with Denmark. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6139174 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61391742018-09-20 Early cost-effectiveness of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) for second line treatment in advanced melanoma: a model-based economic evaluation Retèl, Valesca P. Steuten, Lotte M. G. Geukes Foppen, Marnix H. Mewes, Janne C. Lindenberg, Melanie A. Haanen, John B. A. G. van Harten, Wim H. BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: An emerging immunotherapy is infusion of tumor infiltrating Lymphocytes (TIL), with objective response rates of around 50% versus 19% for ipilimumab. As an Advanced Therapeutic Medicinal Products (ATMP), TIL is highly personalized and complex therapy. It requests substantial upfront investments from the hospital in: expensive lab-equipment, staff expertise and training, as well as extremely tight hospital logistics. Therefore, an early health economic modelling study, as part of a Coverage with Evidence Development (CED) program, was performed. METHODS: We used a Markov decision model to estimate the expected costs and outcomes (quality-adjusted life years; QALYs) for TIL versus ipilimumab for second line treatment in metastatic melanoma patients from a Dutch health care perspective over a life long time horizon. Three mutually exclusive health states (stable disease (responders)), progressive disease and death) were modelled. To inform further research prioritization, Value of Information (VOI) analysis was performed. RESULTS: TIL is expected to generate more QALYs compared to ipilimumab (0.45 versus 0.38 respectively) at lower incremental cost (presently €81,140 versus €94,705 respectively) resulting in a dominant ICER (less costly and more effective). Based on current information TIL is dominating ipilimumab and has a probability of 86% for being cost effective at a cost/QALY threshold of €80,000. The Expected Value of Perfect Information (EVPI) amounted to €3 M. CONCLUSIONS: TIL is expected to have the highest probability of being cost-effective in second line treatment for advanced melanoma compared to ipilimumab. To reduce decision uncertainty, a clinical trial investigating e.g. costs and survival seems most valuable. This is currently being undertaken as part of a CED program in the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, in collaboration with Denmark. BioMed Central 2018-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6139174/ /pubmed/30219040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4788-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Retèl, Valesca P. Steuten, Lotte M. G. Geukes Foppen, Marnix H. Mewes, Janne C. Lindenberg, Melanie A. Haanen, John B. A. G. van Harten, Wim H. Early cost-effectiveness of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) for second line treatment in advanced melanoma: a model-based economic evaluation |
title | Early cost-effectiveness of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) for second line treatment in advanced melanoma: a model-based economic evaluation |
title_full | Early cost-effectiveness of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) for second line treatment in advanced melanoma: a model-based economic evaluation |
title_fullStr | Early cost-effectiveness of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) for second line treatment in advanced melanoma: a model-based economic evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Early cost-effectiveness of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) for second line treatment in advanced melanoma: a model-based economic evaluation |
title_short | Early cost-effectiveness of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) for second line treatment in advanced melanoma: a model-based economic evaluation |
title_sort | early cost-effectiveness of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (til) for second line treatment in advanced melanoma: a model-based economic evaluation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6139174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30219040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4788-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT retelvalescap earlycosteffectivenessoftumorinfiltratinglymphocytestilforsecondlinetreatmentinadvancedmelanomaamodelbasedeconomicevaluation AT steutenlottemg earlycosteffectivenessoftumorinfiltratinglymphocytestilforsecondlinetreatmentinadvancedmelanomaamodelbasedeconomicevaluation AT geukesfoppenmarnixh earlycosteffectivenessoftumorinfiltratinglymphocytestilforsecondlinetreatmentinadvancedmelanomaamodelbasedeconomicevaluation AT mewesjannec earlycosteffectivenessoftumorinfiltratinglymphocytestilforsecondlinetreatmentinadvancedmelanomaamodelbasedeconomicevaluation AT lindenbergmelaniea earlycosteffectivenessoftumorinfiltratinglymphocytestilforsecondlinetreatmentinadvancedmelanomaamodelbasedeconomicevaluation AT haanenjohnbag earlycosteffectivenessoftumorinfiltratinglymphocytestilforsecondlinetreatmentinadvancedmelanomaamodelbasedeconomicevaluation AT vanhartenwimh earlycosteffectivenessoftumorinfiltratinglymphocytestilforsecondlinetreatmentinadvancedmelanomaamodelbasedeconomicevaluation |