Cargando…

Early cost-effectiveness of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) for second line treatment in advanced melanoma: a model-based economic evaluation

BACKGROUND: An emerging immunotherapy is infusion of tumor infiltrating Lymphocytes (TIL), with objective response rates of around 50% versus 19% for ipilimumab. As an Advanced Therapeutic Medicinal Products (ATMP), TIL is highly personalized and complex therapy. It requests substantial upfront inve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Retèl, Valesca P., Steuten, Lotte M. G., Geukes Foppen, Marnix H., Mewes, Janne C., Lindenberg, Melanie A., Haanen, John B. A. G., van Harten, Wim H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6139174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30219040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4788-5
_version_ 1783355467698798592
author Retèl, Valesca P.
Steuten, Lotte M. G.
Geukes Foppen, Marnix H.
Mewes, Janne C.
Lindenberg, Melanie A.
Haanen, John B. A. G.
van Harten, Wim H.
author_facet Retèl, Valesca P.
Steuten, Lotte M. G.
Geukes Foppen, Marnix H.
Mewes, Janne C.
Lindenberg, Melanie A.
Haanen, John B. A. G.
van Harten, Wim H.
author_sort Retèl, Valesca P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An emerging immunotherapy is infusion of tumor infiltrating Lymphocytes (TIL), with objective response rates of around 50% versus 19% for ipilimumab. As an Advanced Therapeutic Medicinal Products (ATMP), TIL is highly personalized and complex therapy. It requests substantial upfront investments from the hospital in: expensive lab-equipment, staff expertise and training, as well as extremely tight hospital logistics. Therefore, an early health economic modelling study, as part of a Coverage with Evidence Development (CED) program, was performed. METHODS: We used a Markov decision model to estimate the expected costs and outcomes (quality-adjusted life years; QALYs) for TIL versus ipilimumab for second line treatment in metastatic melanoma patients from a Dutch health care perspective over a life long time horizon. Three mutually exclusive health states (stable disease (responders)), progressive disease and death) were modelled. To inform further research prioritization, Value of Information (VOI) analysis was performed. RESULTS: TIL is expected to generate more QALYs compared to ipilimumab (0.45 versus 0.38 respectively) at lower incremental cost (presently €81,140 versus €94,705 respectively) resulting in a dominant ICER (less costly and more effective). Based on current information TIL is dominating ipilimumab and has a probability of 86% for being cost effective at a cost/QALY threshold of €80,000. The Expected Value of Perfect Information (EVPI) amounted to €3 M. CONCLUSIONS: TIL is expected to have the highest probability of being cost-effective in second line treatment for advanced melanoma compared to ipilimumab. To reduce decision uncertainty, a clinical trial investigating e.g. costs and survival seems most valuable. This is currently being undertaken as part of a CED program in the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, in collaboration with Denmark.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6139174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61391742018-09-20 Early cost-effectiveness of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) for second line treatment in advanced melanoma: a model-based economic evaluation Retèl, Valesca P. Steuten, Lotte M. G. Geukes Foppen, Marnix H. Mewes, Janne C. Lindenberg, Melanie A. Haanen, John B. A. G. van Harten, Wim H. BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: An emerging immunotherapy is infusion of tumor infiltrating Lymphocytes (TIL), with objective response rates of around 50% versus 19% for ipilimumab. As an Advanced Therapeutic Medicinal Products (ATMP), TIL is highly personalized and complex therapy. It requests substantial upfront investments from the hospital in: expensive lab-equipment, staff expertise and training, as well as extremely tight hospital logistics. Therefore, an early health economic modelling study, as part of a Coverage with Evidence Development (CED) program, was performed. METHODS: We used a Markov decision model to estimate the expected costs and outcomes (quality-adjusted life years; QALYs) for TIL versus ipilimumab for second line treatment in metastatic melanoma patients from a Dutch health care perspective over a life long time horizon. Three mutually exclusive health states (stable disease (responders)), progressive disease and death) were modelled. To inform further research prioritization, Value of Information (VOI) analysis was performed. RESULTS: TIL is expected to generate more QALYs compared to ipilimumab (0.45 versus 0.38 respectively) at lower incremental cost (presently €81,140 versus €94,705 respectively) resulting in a dominant ICER (less costly and more effective). Based on current information TIL is dominating ipilimumab and has a probability of 86% for being cost effective at a cost/QALY threshold of €80,000. The Expected Value of Perfect Information (EVPI) amounted to €3 M. CONCLUSIONS: TIL is expected to have the highest probability of being cost-effective in second line treatment for advanced melanoma compared to ipilimumab. To reduce decision uncertainty, a clinical trial investigating e.g. costs and survival seems most valuable. This is currently being undertaken as part of a CED program in the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, in collaboration with Denmark. BioMed Central 2018-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6139174/ /pubmed/30219040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4788-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Retèl, Valesca P.
Steuten, Lotte M. G.
Geukes Foppen, Marnix H.
Mewes, Janne C.
Lindenberg, Melanie A.
Haanen, John B. A. G.
van Harten, Wim H.
Early cost-effectiveness of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) for second line treatment in advanced melanoma: a model-based economic evaluation
title Early cost-effectiveness of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) for second line treatment in advanced melanoma: a model-based economic evaluation
title_full Early cost-effectiveness of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) for second line treatment in advanced melanoma: a model-based economic evaluation
title_fullStr Early cost-effectiveness of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) for second line treatment in advanced melanoma: a model-based economic evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Early cost-effectiveness of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) for second line treatment in advanced melanoma: a model-based economic evaluation
title_short Early cost-effectiveness of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) for second line treatment in advanced melanoma: a model-based economic evaluation
title_sort early cost-effectiveness of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (til) for second line treatment in advanced melanoma: a model-based economic evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6139174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30219040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4788-5
work_keys_str_mv AT retelvalescap earlycosteffectivenessoftumorinfiltratinglymphocytestilforsecondlinetreatmentinadvancedmelanomaamodelbasedeconomicevaluation
AT steutenlottemg earlycosteffectivenessoftumorinfiltratinglymphocytestilforsecondlinetreatmentinadvancedmelanomaamodelbasedeconomicevaluation
AT geukesfoppenmarnixh earlycosteffectivenessoftumorinfiltratinglymphocytestilforsecondlinetreatmentinadvancedmelanomaamodelbasedeconomicevaluation
AT mewesjannec earlycosteffectivenessoftumorinfiltratinglymphocytestilforsecondlinetreatmentinadvancedmelanomaamodelbasedeconomicevaluation
AT lindenbergmelaniea earlycosteffectivenessoftumorinfiltratinglymphocytestilforsecondlinetreatmentinadvancedmelanomaamodelbasedeconomicevaluation
AT haanenjohnbag earlycosteffectivenessoftumorinfiltratinglymphocytestilforsecondlinetreatmentinadvancedmelanomaamodelbasedeconomicevaluation
AT vanhartenwimh earlycosteffectivenessoftumorinfiltratinglymphocytestilforsecondlinetreatmentinadvancedmelanomaamodelbasedeconomicevaluation