Cargando…

Low-Load Resistance Training With Blood Flow Restriction Improves Clinical Outcomes in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: There is growing evidence to support the use of low-load blood flow restriction (LL-BFR) exercise in musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of low-load blood flow restricted (LL-BFR) training versus conventional hig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ladlow, Peter, Coppack, Russell J., Dharm-Datta, Shreshth, Conway, Dean, Sellon, Edward, Patterson, Stephen D., Bennett, Alexander N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6139300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30246795
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01269
_version_ 1783355488652492800
author Ladlow, Peter
Coppack, Russell J.
Dharm-Datta, Shreshth
Conway, Dean
Sellon, Edward
Patterson, Stephen D.
Bennett, Alexander N.
author_facet Ladlow, Peter
Coppack, Russell J.
Dharm-Datta, Shreshth
Conway, Dean
Sellon, Edward
Patterson, Stephen D.
Bennett, Alexander N.
author_sort Ladlow, Peter
collection PubMed
description Background: There is growing evidence to support the use of low-load blood flow restriction (LL-BFR) exercise in musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of low-load blood flow restricted (LL-BFR) training versus conventional high mechanical load resistance training (RT) on the clinical outcomes of patient’s undergoing inpatient multidisciplinary team (MDT) rehabilitation. Study design: A single-blind randomized controlled study. Methods: Twenty-eight lower-limb injured adults completed a 3-week intensive MDT rehabilitation program. Participants were randomly allocated into a conventional RT (3-days/week) or twice-daily LL-BFR training group. Outcome measurements were taken at baseline and 3-weeks and included quadriceps and total thigh muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and volume, muscle strength [five repetition maximum (RM) leg press and knee extension test, isometric hip extension], pain and physical function measures (Y-balance test, multistage locomotion test—MSLT). Results: A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance revealed no significant differences between groups for any outcome measure post-intervention (p > 0.05). Both groups showed significant improvements in mean scores for muscle CSA/volume, 5-RM leg press, and 5-RM knee extension (p < 0.01) after treatment. LL-BFR group participants also demonstrated significant improvements in MSLT and Y-balance scores (p < 0.01). The Pain scores during training reduced significantly over time in the LL-BFR group (p = 0.024), with no adverse events reported during the study. Conclusion: Comparable improvements in muscle strength and hypertrophy were shown in LL-BFR and conventional training groups following in-patient rehabilitation. The LL-BFR group also achieved significant improvements in functional capacity. LL-BFR training is a rehabilitation tool that has the potential to induce positive adaptations in the absence of high mechanical loads and therefore could be considered a treatment option for patients suffering significant functional deficits for whom conventional loaded RT is contraindicated. Trial Registration: ISRCTN Reference: ISRCTN63585315, dated 25 April 2017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6139300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61393002018-09-24 Low-Load Resistance Training With Blood Flow Restriction Improves Clinical Outcomes in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Ladlow, Peter Coppack, Russell J. Dharm-Datta, Shreshth Conway, Dean Sellon, Edward Patterson, Stephen D. Bennett, Alexander N. Front Physiol Physiology Background: There is growing evidence to support the use of low-load blood flow restriction (LL-BFR) exercise in musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of low-load blood flow restricted (LL-BFR) training versus conventional high mechanical load resistance training (RT) on the clinical outcomes of patient’s undergoing inpatient multidisciplinary team (MDT) rehabilitation. Study design: A single-blind randomized controlled study. Methods: Twenty-eight lower-limb injured adults completed a 3-week intensive MDT rehabilitation program. Participants were randomly allocated into a conventional RT (3-days/week) or twice-daily LL-BFR training group. Outcome measurements were taken at baseline and 3-weeks and included quadriceps and total thigh muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and volume, muscle strength [five repetition maximum (RM) leg press and knee extension test, isometric hip extension], pain and physical function measures (Y-balance test, multistage locomotion test—MSLT). Results: A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance revealed no significant differences between groups for any outcome measure post-intervention (p > 0.05). Both groups showed significant improvements in mean scores for muscle CSA/volume, 5-RM leg press, and 5-RM knee extension (p < 0.01) after treatment. LL-BFR group participants also demonstrated significant improvements in MSLT and Y-balance scores (p < 0.01). The Pain scores during training reduced significantly over time in the LL-BFR group (p = 0.024), with no adverse events reported during the study. Conclusion: Comparable improvements in muscle strength and hypertrophy were shown in LL-BFR and conventional training groups following in-patient rehabilitation. The LL-BFR group also achieved significant improvements in functional capacity. LL-BFR training is a rehabilitation tool that has the potential to induce positive adaptations in the absence of high mechanical loads and therefore could be considered a treatment option for patients suffering significant functional deficits for whom conventional loaded RT is contraindicated. Trial Registration: ISRCTN Reference: ISRCTN63585315, dated 25 April 2017. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6139300/ /pubmed/30246795 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01269 Text en Copyright © 2018 Ladlow, Coppack, Dharm-Datta, Conway, Sellon, Patterson and Bennett. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Ladlow, Peter
Coppack, Russell J.
Dharm-Datta, Shreshth
Conway, Dean
Sellon, Edward
Patterson, Stephen D.
Bennett, Alexander N.
Low-Load Resistance Training With Blood Flow Restriction Improves Clinical Outcomes in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
title Low-Load Resistance Training With Blood Flow Restriction Improves Clinical Outcomes in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Low-Load Resistance Training With Blood Flow Restriction Improves Clinical Outcomes in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Low-Load Resistance Training With Blood Flow Restriction Improves Clinical Outcomes in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Low-Load Resistance Training With Blood Flow Restriction Improves Clinical Outcomes in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Low-Load Resistance Training With Blood Flow Restriction Improves Clinical Outcomes in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction improves clinical outcomes in musculoskeletal rehabilitation: a single-blind randomized controlled trial
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6139300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30246795
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01269
work_keys_str_mv AT ladlowpeter lowloadresistancetrainingwithbloodflowrestrictionimprovesclinicaloutcomesinmusculoskeletalrehabilitationasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT coppackrussellj lowloadresistancetrainingwithbloodflowrestrictionimprovesclinicaloutcomesinmusculoskeletalrehabilitationasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dharmdattashreshth lowloadresistancetrainingwithbloodflowrestrictionimprovesclinicaloutcomesinmusculoskeletalrehabilitationasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT conwaydean lowloadresistancetrainingwithbloodflowrestrictionimprovesclinicaloutcomesinmusculoskeletalrehabilitationasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sellonedward lowloadresistancetrainingwithbloodflowrestrictionimprovesclinicaloutcomesinmusculoskeletalrehabilitationasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pattersonstephend lowloadresistancetrainingwithbloodflowrestrictionimprovesclinicaloutcomesinmusculoskeletalrehabilitationasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bennettalexandern lowloadresistancetrainingwithbloodflowrestrictionimprovesclinicaloutcomesinmusculoskeletalrehabilitationasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial