Cargando…
The Patient in Precision Medicine: A Systematic Review Examining Evaluations of Patient-Facing Materials
Precision medicine (PM) has the potential to tailor healthcare to the individual patient by using their genetic information to guide treatment choices. However, this process is complex and difficult to understand for patients and providers alike. With a recent push in the healthcare community to und...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6140003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30250657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9541621 |
_version_ | 1783355552352436224 |
---|---|
author | Wynn, Rachel M. Adams, Katharine T. Kowalski, Rebecca L. Shivega, Winnie G. Ratwani, Raj M. Miller, Kristen E. |
author_facet | Wynn, Rachel M. Adams, Katharine T. Kowalski, Rebecca L. Shivega, Winnie G. Ratwani, Raj M. Miller, Kristen E. |
author_sort | Wynn, Rachel M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Precision medicine (PM) has the potential to tailor healthcare to the individual patient by using their genetic information to guide treatment choices. However, this process is complex and difficult to understand for patients and providers alike. With a recent push in the healthcare community to understand the patient experience and engage patients in their care, it is important to give patients the opportunity to learn about PM. We performed a systematic review to identify previous work assessing the quality of patient-facing PM materials from 2008 to July 2018. Ten studies were identified, which used varying methods and measures. A qualitative assessment was conducted to compare key elements of the studies, including study design, characteristics of the participant population, what measurements were used to assess the PM materials, understandability, preference, psychological reactions, and the type of PM materials being assessed. The studies identified provide important groundwork by highlighting consistent aspects of design that aid in comprehension. Eight of the ten studies focused on the content and organization of genomic test results, while the remaining two assessed educational tools. Two main design elements that appeared across the studies were appropriately designed visual aids and simplified language. The studies identified were limited by the participant populations that were used, which were primarily white and well educated. Only one study attempted to oversample patient populations typically underrepresented in this type of research. Through our systematic review, it is evident that the breadth of knowledge in this field is limited in scope and that more work must be done to ensure that patients can engage in their care when faced with PM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6140003 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61400032018-09-24 The Patient in Precision Medicine: A Systematic Review Examining Evaluations of Patient-Facing Materials Wynn, Rachel M. Adams, Katharine T. Kowalski, Rebecca L. Shivega, Winnie G. Ratwani, Raj M. Miller, Kristen E. J Healthc Eng Review Article Precision medicine (PM) has the potential to tailor healthcare to the individual patient by using their genetic information to guide treatment choices. However, this process is complex and difficult to understand for patients and providers alike. With a recent push in the healthcare community to understand the patient experience and engage patients in their care, it is important to give patients the opportunity to learn about PM. We performed a systematic review to identify previous work assessing the quality of patient-facing PM materials from 2008 to July 2018. Ten studies were identified, which used varying methods and measures. A qualitative assessment was conducted to compare key elements of the studies, including study design, characteristics of the participant population, what measurements were used to assess the PM materials, understandability, preference, psychological reactions, and the type of PM materials being assessed. The studies identified provide important groundwork by highlighting consistent aspects of design that aid in comprehension. Eight of the ten studies focused on the content and organization of genomic test results, while the remaining two assessed educational tools. Two main design elements that appeared across the studies were appropriately designed visual aids and simplified language. The studies identified were limited by the participant populations that were used, which were primarily white and well educated. Only one study attempted to oversample patient populations typically underrepresented in this type of research. Through our systematic review, it is evident that the breadth of knowledge in this field is limited in scope and that more work must be done to ensure that patients can engage in their care when faced with PM. Hindawi 2018-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6140003/ /pubmed/30250657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9541621 Text en Copyright © 2018 Rachel M. Wynn et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Wynn, Rachel M. Adams, Katharine T. Kowalski, Rebecca L. Shivega, Winnie G. Ratwani, Raj M. Miller, Kristen E. The Patient in Precision Medicine: A Systematic Review Examining Evaluations of Patient-Facing Materials |
title | The Patient in Precision Medicine: A Systematic Review Examining Evaluations of Patient-Facing Materials |
title_full | The Patient in Precision Medicine: A Systematic Review Examining Evaluations of Patient-Facing Materials |
title_fullStr | The Patient in Precision Medicine: A Systematic Review Examining Evaluations of Patient-Facing Materials |
title_full_unstemmed | The Patient in Precision Medicine: A Systematic Review Examining Evaluations of Patient-Facing Materials |
title_short | The Patient in Precision Medicine: A Systematic Review Examining Evaluations of Patient-Facing Materials |
title_sort | patient in precision medicine: a systematic review examining evaluations of patient-facing materials |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6140003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30250657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9541621 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wynnrachelm thepatientinprecisionmedicineasystematicreviewexaminingevaluationsofpatientfacingmaterials AT adamskatharinet thepatientinprecisionmedicineasystematicreviewexaminingevaluationsofpatientfacingmaterials AT kowalskirebeccal thepatientinprecisionmedicineasystematicreviewexaminingevaluationsofpatientfacingmaterials AT shivegawinnieg thepatientinprecisionmedicineasystematicreviewexaminingevaluationsofpatientfacingmaterials AT ratwanirajm thepatientinprecisionmedicineasystematicreviewexaminingevaluationsofpatientfacingmaterials AT millerkristene thepatientinprecisionmedicineasystematicreviewexaminingevaluationsofpatientfacingmaterials AT wynnrachelm patientinprecisionmedicineasystematicreviewexaminingevaluationsofpatientfacingmaterials AT adamskatharinet patientinprecisionmedicineasystematicreviewexaminingevaluationsofpatientfacingmaterials AT kowalskirebeccal patientinprecisionmedicineasystematicreviewexaminingevaluationsofpatientfacingmaterials AT shivegawinnieg patientinprecisionmedicineasystematicreviewexaminingevaluationsofpatientfacingmaterials AT ratwanirajm patientinprecisionmedicineasystematicreviewexaminingevaluationsofpatientfacingmaterials AT millerkristene patientinprecisionmedicineasystematicreviewexaminingevaluationsofpatientfacingmaterials |