Cargando…

Drug susceptibility testing of slowly growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria using slomyco test-system

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the research was to assess the susceptibility of the slowly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria strains to the antimicrobial drugs used for mycobaterioses treatment using SLOMYCO test system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed 363 NTM strains: 177 MAC (161 M. avium, 16 M....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Litvinov, Vitalii, Makarova, Marina, Galkina, Ksenia, Khachaturiants, Elena, Krasnova, Maria, Guntupova, Lidia, Safonova, Svetlana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6141080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30222736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203108
_version_ 1783355644955328512
author Litvinov, Vitalii
Makarova, Marina
Galkina, Ksenia
Khachaturiants, Elena
Krasnova, Maria
Guntupova, Lidia
Safonova, Svetlana
author_facet Litvinov, Vitalii
Makarova, Marina
Galkina, Ksenia
Khachaturiants, Elena
Krasnova, Maria
Guntupova, Lidia
Safonova, Svetlana
author_sort Litvinov, Vitalii
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of the research was to assess the susceptibility of the slowly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria strains to the antimicrobial drugs used for mycobaterioses treatment using SLOMYCO test system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed 363 NTM strains: 177 MAC (161 M. avium, 16 M. intracellulare), 112 M. kansasii and 74 M. xenopi collected from the respiratory material of the patients were under the treatment or under diagnostic procedures at our Center, affiliates and the diagnostic department in 2010–2016. Drug sucseptibility for NTM was tested using the Sensititre SLOWMYCO system (TREK DIAGNOSTIC Systems Ltd., UK). MICs were established by microdilutions in Mueller-Hinton broth on polystyrene 96-well plates. The statistical analysis was done using the StatGraphics Plus 5.0 software. The data were compared pairwise using Pearson χ(2) test with Yates correction. 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Statistically significant differences were considered for p <0.05. Log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess the concentration-dependent surveillance probability. RESULTS: The statistically significant differences were revealed in sensitivity/resistance isolates of M. avium and M. intracellulare: M. avium strains were resistant to higher concentrations of amikacin, clarithromycin, linezolid and streptomycin (p <0.01); M. intracellulare strains were resistant to higher concentrations of ethionamide (p <0.05). The isolates of M. avium were significantly more resistant than M. kansasii to amikacin, doxycycline, isoniazid, clarithromycin, linezolid, moxifloxacin, rifabutin, rifampicin, streptomycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, ethambutol, ethionamide (visible growth of M. avium were inhibited by higher drug concentrations, p <0.01). The isolates of M. avium showed significantly higher resistance than M. xenopi to amikacin, doxycycline, isoniazid, clarithromycin, linezolid, moxifloxacin, rifampicin, streptomycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, ethambutol, and ethionamide (visible growth of M. avium were inhibited by higher drug concentrations, p <0.01). Statistically significant differences in the dynamics of the response to the antibacterial effects of isoniazid, linezolid, moxifloxacin, rifampicin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ethambutol, and ethionamide were found for M. intracellulare and M. xenopi (complete inhibition of the visible growth of M. intracellulare required higher drugs concentrations, p <0, 05). Comparison of the Kaplan-Meyer curves revealed statistically significant differences in survialence probability of M. kansasii and M. xenopi for amikacin, doxycycline, rifampicin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, ethambutol, and ethionamide (a higher number of isolates of M. xenopi were inhibited by low drugs concentrations, p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that M. avium and M. intracellulare were more resistant to the majority of the studied drugs than M. kansasii and M. xenopi.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6141080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61410802018-09-21 Drug susceptibility testing of slowly growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria using slomyco test-system Litvinov, Vitalii Makarova, Marina Galkina, Ksenia Khachaturiants, Elena Krasnova, Maria Guntupova, Lidia Safonova, Svetlana PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The objective of the research was to assess the susceptibility of the slowly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria strains to the antimicrobial drugs used for mycobaterioses treatment using SLOMYCO test system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed 363 NTM strains: 177 MAC (161 M. avium, 16 M. intracellulare), 112 M. kansasii and 74 M. xenopi collected from the respiratory material of the patients were under the treatment or under diagnostic procedures at our Center, affiliates and the diagnostic department in 2010–2016. Drug sucseptibility for NTM was tested using the Sensititre SLOWMYCO system (TREK DIAGNOSTIC Systems Ltd., UK). MICs were established by microdilutions in Mueller-Hinton broth on polystyrene 96-well plates. The statistical analysis was done using the StatGraphics Plus 5.0 software. The data were compared pairwise using Pearson χ(2) test with Yates correction. 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Statistically significant differences were considered for p <0.05. Log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess the concentration-dependent surveillance probability. RESULTS: The statistically significant differences were revealed in sensitivity/resistance isolates of M. avium and M. intracellulare: M. avium strains were resistant to higher concentrations of amikacin, clarithromycin, linezolid and streptomycin (p <0.01); M. intracellulare strains were resistant to higher concentrations of ethionamide (p <0.05). The isolates of M. avium were significantly more resistant than M. kansasii to amikacin, doxycycline, isoniazid, clarithromycin, linezolid, moxifloxacin, rifabutin, rifampicin, streptomycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, ethambutol, ethionamide (visible growth of M. avium were inhibited by higher drug concentrations, p <0.01). The isolates of M. avium showed significantly higher resistance than M. xenopi to amikacin, doxycycline, isoniazid, clarithromycin, linezolid, moxifloxacin, rifampicin, streptomycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, ethambutol, and ethionamide (visible growth of M. avium were inhibited by higher drug concentrations, p <0.01). Statistically significant differences in the dynamics of the response to the antibacterial effects of isoniazid, linezolid, moxifloxacin, rifampicin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ethambutol, and ethionamide were found for M. intracellulare and M. xenopi (complete inhibition of the visible growth of M. intracellulare required higher drugs concentrations, p <0, 05). Comparison of the Kaplan-Meyer curves revealed statistically significant differences in survialence probability of M. kansasii and M. xenopi for amikacin, doxycycline, rifampicin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, ethambutol, and ethionamide (a higher number of isolates of M. xenopi were inhibited by low drugs concentrations, p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that M. avium and M. intracellulare were more resistant to the majority of the studied drugs than M. kansasii and M. xenopi. Public Library of Science 2018-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6141080/ /pubmed/30222736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203108 Text en © 2018 Litvinov et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Litvinov, Vitalii
Makarova, Marina
Galkina, Ksenia
Khachaturiants, Elena
Krasnova, Maria
Guntupova, Lidia
Safonova, Svetlana
Drug susceptibility testing of slowly growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria using slomyco test-system
title Drug susceptibility testing of slowly growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria using slomyco test-system
title_full Drug susceptibility testing of slowly growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria using slomyco test-system
title_fullStr Drug susceptibility testing of slowly growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria using slomyco test-system
title_full_unstemmed Drug susceptibility testing of slowly growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria using slomyco test-system
title_short Drug susceptibility testing of slowly growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria using slomyco test-system
title_sort drug susceptibility testing of slowly growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria using slomyco test-system
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6141080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30222736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203108
work_keys_str_mv AT litvinovvitalii drugsusceptibilitytestingofslowlygrowingnontuberculousmycobacteriausingslomycotestsystem
AT makarovamarina drugsusceptibilitytestingofslowlygrowingnontuberculousmycobacteriausingslomycotestsystem
AT galkinaksenia drugsusceptibilitytestingofslowlygrowingnontuberculousmycobacteriausingslomycotestsystem
AT khachaturiantselena drugsusceptibilitytestingofslowlygrowingnontuberculousmycobacteriausingslomycotestsystem
AT krasnovamaria drugsusceptibilitytestingofslowlygrowingnontuberculousmycobacteriausingslomycotestsystem
AT guntupovalidia drugsusceptibilitytestingofslowlygrowingnontuberculousmycobacteriausingslomycotestsystem
AT safonovasvetlana drugsusceptibilitytestingofslowlygrowingnontuberculousmycobacteriausingslomycotestsystem