Cargando…

A cross-sectional study of the welfare of calves raised in smallholder dairy farms in Meru, Kenya, 2017

AIM: This study was aimed at describing calf comfort and determining the individual and pen level factors that affect comfort status (in particular, calf leg hygiene scores) of smallholder dairy farms in Meru County, Kenya. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out on 52 calves...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kathambi, Emily. K., Van Leeuwen, John A., Gitau, George K., McKenna, Shawn L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Veterinary World 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6141292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30250369
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.1094-1101
_version_ 1783355678490886144
author Kathambi, Emily. K.
Van Leeuwen, John A.
Gitau, George K.
McKenna, Shawn L.
author_facet Kathambi, Emily. K.
Van Leeuwen, John A.
Gitau, George K.
McKenna, Shawn L.
author_sort Kathambi, Emily. K.
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study was aimed at describing calf comfort and determining the individual and pen level factors that affect comfort status (in particular, calf leg hygiene scores) of smallholder dairy farms in Meru County, Kenya. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out on 52 calves that were up to 1 year old in 38 dairy farms (mean±standard deviation: Herd size=1.71±0.7 milking cows and milk production=6.7±3.1 L/day) in Meru, Kenya, in 2017, with the intention to describe their comfort and determine the factors associated with leg hygiene as a critical parameter for calf comfort assessment. Calves’ biodata, health status, and leg hygiene were assessed, along with pen characteristics such as area, hygiene, and knee impact and knee wetness scores, while a questionnaire was administered to the farmers to gather information regarding calf housing management practices in the farm. RESULTS: The calves had a mean body weight of 85.2±32.8 kg and average daily weight gain of 0.50±0.45 kg per day. 71% of calves had a good body condition score (≥2.5), and the mean space allowance per calf was 2.52±1.56 m(2). Approximately 75% of the calves (39/52) were kept in pens, and the rest were reared outdoors. For 39 calves kept indoors, 26% (10/39) of them had wooden or concrete floors while 74% (29/39) had dirt floors. Nearly two-thirds (62%) of indoor calves (26/39) were reared in pens with bedding, and 23% (9/39) and 33% (13/39) of the calves reared indoors were kept in pens displaying a failed knee impact test and failed knee wetness test. Indoor housed calves had an increased probability of having dirty calf legs (cleanliness score of >2.5) by 8.6 times (p=0.031), compared to outdoor-housed calves. In the final multivariable logistic regression model of 39 calves in pens, concrete or wood floors (odds ratio [OR]=7.9, p=0.047), poor body condition (OR=17.1, p=0.020) and use of bedding (OR=12.5, p=0.046) appeared to be positively correlated with dirtiness of calf legs, compared to dirt floors, good body condition, and no bedding, respectively. CONCLUSION: Overall, some calf comfort aspects were covered for the majority of calves examined, but 69% of the pens were categorized as dirty, especially those with wooden or concrete floors and poor bedding management. Smallholder dairy farmers in Kenya should be trained on calf housing management to improve calf comfort and productivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6141292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Veterinary World
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61412922018-09-24 A cross-sectional study of the welfare of calves raised in smallholder dairy farms in Meru, Kenya, 2017 Kathambi, Emily. K. Van Leeuwen, John A. Gitau, George K. McKenna, Shawn L. Vet World Research Article AIM: This study was aimed at describing calf comfort and determining the individual and pen level factors that affect comfort status (in particular, calf leg hygiene scores) of smallholder dairy farms in Meru County, Kenya. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out on 52 calves that were up to 1 year old in 38 dairy farms (mean±standard deviation: Herd size=1.71±0.7 milking cows and milk production=6.7±3.1 L/day) in Meru, Kenya, in 2017, with the intention to describe their comfort and determine the factors associated with leg hygiene as a critical parameter for calf comfort assessment. Calves’ biodata, health status, and leg hygiene were assessed, along with pen characteristics such as area, hygiene, and knee impact and knee wetness scores, while a questionnaire was administered to the farmers to gather information regarding calf housing management practices in the farm. RESULTS: The calves had a mean body weight of 85.2±32.8 kg and average daily weight gain of 0.50±0.45 kg per day. 71% of calves had a good body condition score (≥2.5), and the mean space allowance per calf was 2.52±1.56 m(2). Approximately 75% of the calves (39/52) were kept in pens, and the rest were reared outdoors. For 39 calves kept indoors, 26% (10/39) of them had wooden or concrete floors while 74% (29/39) had dirt floors. Nearly two-thirds (62%) of indoor calves (26/39) were reared in pens with bedding, and 23% (9/39) and 33% (13/39) of the calves reared indoors were kept in pens displaying a failed knee impact test and failed knee wetness test. Indoor housed calves had an increased probability of having dirty calf legs (cleanliness score of >2.5) by 8.6 times (p=0.031), compared to outdoor-housed calves. In the final multivariable logistic regression model of 39 calves in pens, concrete or wood floors (odds ratio [OR]=7.9, p=0.047), poor body condition (OR=17.1, p=0.020) and use of bedding (OR=12.5, p=0.046) appeared to be positively correlated with dirtiness of calf legs, compared to dirt floors, good body condition, and no bedding, respectively. CONCLUSION: Overall, some calf comfort aspects were covered for the majority of calves examined, but 69% of the pens were categorized as dirty, especially those with wooden or concrete floors and poor bedding management. Smallholder dairy farmers in Kenya should be trained on calf housing management to improve calf comfort and productivity. Veterinary World 2018-08 2018-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6141292/ /pubmed/30250369 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.1094-1101 Text en Copyright: © Kathambi, et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kathambi, Emily. K.
Van Leeuwen, John A.
Gitau, George K.
McKenna, Shawn L.
A cross-sectional study of the welfare of calves raised in smallholder dairy farms in Meru, Kenya, 2017
title A cross-sectional study of the welfare of calves raised in smallholder dairy farms in Meru, Kenya, 2017
title_full A cross-sectional study of the welfare of calves raised in smallholder dairy farms in Meru, Kenya, 2017
title_fullStr A cross-sectional study of the welfare of calves raised in smallholder dairy farms in Meru, Kenya, 2017
title_full_unstemmed A cross-sectional study of the welfare of calves raised in smallholder dairy farms in Meru, Kenya, 2017
title_short A cross-sectional study of the welfare of calves raised in smallholder dairy farms in Meru, Kenya, 2017
title_sort cross-sectional study of the welfare of calves raised in smallholder dairy farms in meru, kenya, 2017
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6141292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30250369
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.1094-1101
work_keys_str_mv AT kathambiemilyk acrosssectionalstudyofthewelfareofcalvesraisedinsmallholderdairyfarmsinmerukenya2017
AT vanleeuwenjohna acrosssectionalstudyofthewelfareofcalvesraisedinsmallholderdairyfarmsinmerukenya2017
AT gitaugeorgek acrosssectionalstudyofthewelfareofcalvesraisedinsmallholderdairyfarmsinmerukenya2017
AT mckennashawnl acrosssectionalstudyofthewelfareofcalvesraisedinsmallholderdairyfarmsinmerukenya2017
AT kathambiemilyk crosssectionalstudyofthewelfareofcalvesraisedinsmallholderdairyfarmsinmerukenya2017
AT vanleeuwenjohna crosssectionalstudyofthewelfareofcalvesraisedinsmallholderdairyfarmsinmerukenya2017
AT gitaugeorgek crosssectionalstudyofthewelfareofcalvesraisedinsmallholderdairyfarmsinmerukenya2017
AT mckennashawnl crosssectionalstudyofthewelfareofcalvesraisedinsmallholderdairyfarmsinmerukenya2017