Cargando…

Performance of closed-loop resuscitation of haemorrhagic shock with fluid alone or in combination with norepinephrine: an experimental study

BACKGROUND: Closed-loop resuscitation can improve personalization of care, decrease workload and bring expert knowledge in isolated areas. We have developed a new device to control the administration of fluid or simultaneous co-administration of fluid and norepinephrine using arterial pressure. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Libert, Nicolas, Chenegros, Guillaume, Harrois, Anatole, Baudry, Nathalie, Cordurie, Gilles, Benosman, Ryad, Vicaut, Eric, Duranteau, Jacques
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6141407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30225814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0436-0
_version_ 1783355691144052736
author Libert, Nicolas
Chenegros, Guillaume
Harrois, Anatole
Baudry, Nathalie
Cordurie, Gilles
Benosman, Ryad
Vicaut, Eric
Duranteau, Jacques
author_facet Libert, Nicolas
Chenegros, Guillaume
Harrois, Anatole
Baudry, Nathalie
Cordurie, Gilles
Benosman, Ryad
Vicaut, Eric
Duranteau, Jacques
author_sort Libert, Nicolas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Closed-loop resuscitation can improve personalization of care, decrease workload and bring expert knowledge in isolated areas. We have developed a new device to control the administration of fluid or simultaneous co-administration of fluid and norepinephrine using arterial pressure. METHOD: We evaluated the performance of our prototype in a rodent model of haemorrhagic shock. After haemorrhagic shock, rats were randomized to five experimental groups: three were resuscitated with fluid and two with co-administration of fluid and norepinephrine. Among groups resuscitated with fluid, one was resuscitated by a physician and two were resuscitated according to two different closed-loop algorithms. Among groups resuscitated with fluid and norepinephrine, one was resuscitated by a physician and the other one by the closed-loop device. The precision of arterial pressure during the resuscitation period was assessed using rising time, time passed in the target area and performance error calculations. RESULTS: Groups resuscitated with fluid had similar performances and passed as much time in the target area of 80–90 mmHg as the manual group [manual: 76.8% (67.9–78.2), closed-loop: 64.6% (45.7–72.9) and 80.9% (59.1–85.3)]. Rats resuscitated with fluid and norepinephrine using closed-loop passed similar time in target area than manual group [closed-loop: 74.4% (58.4–84.5) vs. manual: 60.1% (46.1–72.4)] but had shorter rising time to reach target area [160 s (106–187) vs. 434 s (254–1081)] than those resuscitated by a physician. Rats resuscitated with co-administration of fluid and norepinephrine required less fluid and had less hemodilution than rats resuscitated with fluid alone. Lactate decrease was similar between groups resuscitated with fluid alone and fluid with norepinephrine. CONCLUSIONS: This study assessed extensively the performances of several algorithms for closed-loop resuscitation of haemorrhagic shock with fluid alone and with co-administration of fluid and norepinephrine. The performance of the closed-loop algorithms tested was similar to physician-guided treatment with considerable saving of work for the caregiver. Arterial pressure closed-loop guided algorithms can be extended to combined administration of fluid and norepinephrine. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13613-018-0436-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6141407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61414072018-09-28 Performance of closed-loop resuscitation of haemorrhagic shock with fluid alone or in combination with norepinephrine: an experimental study Libert, Nicolas Chenegros, Guillaume Harrois, Anatole Baudry, Nathalie Cordurie, Gilles Benosman, Ryad Vicaut, Eric Duranteau, Jacques Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Closed-loop resuscitation can improve personalization of care, decrease workload and bring expert knowledge in isolated areas. We have developed a new device to control the administration of fluid or simultaneous co-administration of fluid and norepinephrine using arterial pressure. METHOD: We evaluated the performance of our prototype in a rodent model of haemorrhagic shock. After haemorrhagic shock, rats were randomized to five experimental groups: three were resuscitated with fluid and two with co-administration of fluid and norepinephrine. Among groups resuscitated with fluid, one was resuscitated by a physician and two were resuscitated according to two different closed-loop algorithms. Among groups resuscitated with fluid and norepinephrine, one was resuscitated by a physician and the other one by the closed-loop device. The precision of arterial pressure during the resuscitation period was assessed using rising time, time passed in the target area and performance error calculations. RESULTS: Groups resuscitated with fluid had similar performances and passed as much time in the target area of 80–90 mmHg as the manual group [manual: 76.8% (67.9–78.2), closed-loop: 64.6% (45.7–72.9) and 80.9% (59.1–85.3)]. Rats resuscitated with fluid and norepinephrine using closed-loop passed similar time in target area than manual group [closed-loop: 74.4% (58.4–84.5) vs. manual: 60.1% (46.1–72.4)] but had shorter rising time to reach target area [160 s (106–187) vs. 434 s (254–1081)] than those resuscitated by a physician. Rats resuscitated with co-administration of fluid and norepinephrine required less fluid and had less hemodilution than rats resuscitated with fluid alone. Lactate decrease was similar between groups resuscitated with fluid alone and fluid with norepinephrine. CONCLUSIONS: This study assessed extensively the performances of several algorithms for closed-loop resuscitation of haemorrhagic shock with fluid alone and with co-administration of fluid and norepinephrine. The performance of the closed-loop algorithms tested was similar to physician-guided treatment with considerable saving of work for the caregiver. Arterial pressure closed-loop guided algorithms can be extended to combined administration of fluid and norepinephrine. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13613-018-0436-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6141407/ /pubmed/30225814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0436-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Libert, Nicolas
Chenegros, Guillaume
Harrois, Anatole
Baudry, Nathalie
Cordurie, Gilles
Benosman, Ryad
Vicaut, Eric
Duranteau, Jacques
Performance of closed-loop resuscitation of haemorrhagic shock with fluid alone or in combination with norepinephrine: an experimental study
title Performance of closed-loop resuscitation of haemorrhagic shock with fluid alone or in combination with norepinephrine: an experimental study
title_full Performance of closed-loop resuscitation of haemorrhagic shock with fluid alone or in combination with norepinephrine: an experimental study
title_fullStr Performance of closed-loop resuscitation of haemorrhagic shock with fluid alone or in combination with norepinephrine: an experimental study
title_full_unstemmed Performance of closed-loop resuscitation of haemorrhagic shock with fluid alone or in combination with norepinephrine: an experimental study
title_short Performance of closed-loop resuscitation of haemorrhagic shock with fluid alone or in combination with norepinephrine: an experimental study
title_sort performance of closed-loop resuscitation of haemorrhagic shock with fluid alone or in combination with norepinephrine: an experimental study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6141407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30225814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0436-0
work_keys_str_mv AT libertnicolas performanceofclosedloopresuscitationofhaemorrhagicshockwithfluidaloneorincombinationwithnorepinephrineanexperimentalstudy
AT chenegrosguillaume performanceofclosedloopresuscitationofhaemorrhagicshockwithfluidaloneorincombinationwithnorepinephrineanexperimentalstudy
AT harroisanatole performanceofclosedloopresuscitationofhaemorrhagicshockwithfluidaloneorincombinationwithnorepinephrineanexperimentalstudy
AT baudrynathalie performanceofclosedloopresuscitationofhaemorrhagicshockwithfluidaloneorincombinationwithnorepinephrineanexperimentalstudy
AT corduriegilles performanceofclosedloopresuscitationofhaemorrhagicshockwithfluidaloneorincombinationwithnorepinephrineanexperimentalstudy
AT benosmanryad performanceofclosedloopresuscitationofhaemorrhagicshockwithfluidaloneorincombinationwithnorepinephrineanexperimentalstudy
AT vicauteric performanceofclosedloopresuscitationofhaemorrhagicshockwithfluidaloneorincombinationwithnorepinephrineanexperimentalstudy
AT duranteaujacques performanceofclosedloopresuscitationofhaemorrhagicshockwithfluidaloneorincombinationwithnorepinephrineanexperimentalstudy