Cargando…
Feasibility of biventricular volume and function assessment using first-pass gated (15)O-water PET
BACKGROUND: We investigated the feasibility of left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) volume and function estimation using a first-pass gated (15)O-water PET. This prospective study included 19 patients addressed for myocardial perfusion reserve assessment using (15)O-water PET. PET data w...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6141411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30225682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-018-0445-x |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: We investigated the feasibility of left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) volume and function estimation using a first-pass gated (15)O-water PET. This prospective study included 19 patients addressed for myocardial perfusion reserve assessment using (15)O-water PET. PET data were acquired at rest and after regadenoson stress, and gated first-pass images were reconstructed over the time range corresponding to tracer first-pass through the cardiac cavities and post-processed using TomPool software; LV and RV were segmented using a semi-automated 4D immersion algorithm. LV volumes were computed using a count-based model and a fixed threshold at 30% of the maximal activity. RV volumes were computed using a geometrical model and an adjustable threshold that was set so as to fit LV and RV stroke volumes. Ejection curves were fitted using a deformable reference curve model. LV results were compared to those obtained using (99m)Tc-sestamibi gated myocardial SPECT in terms of end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), and ejection fraction (EF). RESULTS: There was an excellent concordance between rest and stress PET in terms of EDV and ESV (Lin’s coefficient ~ 0.85–0.90), SV (~ 0.80), and EF (~ 0.75) for both ventricles. Correlation with myocardial SPECT was high for LV EDV (Pearson’s R = 0.89, p < 0.001) and ESV (R = 0.87, p < 0.001) and satisfying for LV SV (R = 0.67, p < 0.001) and EF (R = 0.67, p < 0.001). Minimal LV ESV overestimation (+ 4 mL, p = 0.03) and EF underestimation (− 4%, p = 0.01) were observed using PET. CONCLUSIONS: Biventricular volume and function assessment are achievable using the first-pass PET, and LV parameters correlate well with those derived from gated myocardial SPECT. |
---|