Cargando…
Comparison of Significant Carotid Stenosis for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma between Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Conventional Two-Dimensional Radiotherapy
Radiotherapy (RT) serves as the most efficient treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and can cause carotid stenosis. This work compared the incidence of significant carotid stenosis between intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2D-RT) for NPC a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6141472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30224668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32398-y |
_version_ | 1783355703146053632 |
---|---|
author | Liao, Wang Zhou, Haihong Fan, Shengnuo Zheng, Yuqiu Zhang, Bei Zhao, Zhongyan Xiao, Songhua Bai, Shoumin Liu, Jun |
author_facet | Liao, Wang Zhou, Haihong Fan, Shengnuo Zheng, Yuqiu Zhang, Bei Zhao, Zhongyan Xiao, Songhua Bai, Shoumin Liu, Jun |
author_sort | Liao, Wang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Radiotherapy (RT) serves as the most efficient treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and can cause carotid stenosis. This work compared the incidence of significant carotid stenosis between intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2D-RT) for NPC and explored the risk factors. We retrospectively reviewed 233 cases with NPC who underwent carotid ultrasound post IMRT or 2D-RT from 2006 to 2015. The incidence of significant stenosis after RT was 19.3%. Significant stenosis was identified in 20 (14.6%) of 137 patients treated with IMRT and 25 (26.0%) of 96 patients with 2D-RT, respectively (p = 0.035). Multivariate logistic analysis indicated age (odds ratio = 1.054, 95% CI = 1.011–1.099, p = 0.014), radiation technique (IMRT) (odds ratio = 0.471, 95%CI = 0.241–0.919, p = 0.027) and time interval (odds ratio = 1.068, 95%CI = 1.033–1.105, p = 0.001) as independent predictors for significant carotid stenosis. Our study suggests that IMRT was associated with decreased incidence of significant carotid stenosis versus 2D-RT for NPC. Prevention and carotid ultrasound should be considered for older NPC survivors with longer interval from RT, especially those treated with 2D-RT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6141472 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61414722018-09-20 Comparison of Significant Carotid Stenosis for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma between Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Conventional Two-Dimensional Radiotherapy Liao, Wang Zhou, Haihong Fan, Shengnuo Zheng, Yuqiu Zhang, Bei Zhao, Zhongyan Xiao, Songhua Bai, Shoumin Liu, Jun Sci Rep Article Radiotherapy (RT) serves as the most efficient treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and can cause carotid stenosis. This work compared the incidence of significant carotid stenosis between intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2D-RT) for NPC and explored the risk factors. We retrospectively reviewed 233 cases with NPC who underwent carotid ultrasound post IMRT or 2D-RT from 2006 to 2015. The incidence of significant stenosis after RT was 19.3%. Significant stenosis was identified in 20 (14.6%) of 137 patients treated with IMRT and 25 (26.0%) of 96 patients with 2D-RT, respectively (p = 0.035). Multivariate logistic analysis indicated age (odds ratio = 1.054, 95% CI = 1.011–1.099, p = 0.014), radiation technique (IMRT) (odds ratio = 0.471, 95%CI = 0.241–0.919, p = 0.027) and time interval (odds ratio = 1.068, 95%CI = 1.033–1.105, p = 0.001) as independent predictors for significant carotid stenosis. Our study suggests that IMRT was associated with decreased incidence of significant carotid stenosis versus 2D-RT for NPC. Prevention and carotid ultrasound should be considered for older NPC survivors with longer interval from RT, especially those treated with 2D-RT. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6141472/ /pubmed/30224668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32398-y Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Liao, Wang Zhou, Haihong Fan, Shengnuo Zheng, Yuqiu Zhang, Bei Zhao, Zhongyan Xiao, Songhua Bai, Shoumin Liu, Jun Comparison of Significant Carotid Stenosis for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma between Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Conventional Two-Dimensional Radiotherapy |
title | Comparison of Significant Carotid Stenosis for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma between Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Conventional Two-Dimensional Radiotherapy |
title_full | Comparison of Significant Carotid Stenosis for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma between Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Conventional Two-Dimensional Radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Significant Carotid Stenosis for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma between Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Conventional Two-Dimensional Radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Significant Carotid Stenosis for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma between Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Conventional Two-Dimensional Radiotherapy |
title_short | Comparison of Significant Carotid Stenosis for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma between Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Conventional Two-Dimensional Radiotherapy |
title_sort | comparison of significant carotid stenosis for nasopharyngeal carcinoma between intensity-modulated radiotherapy and conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6141472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30224668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32398-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liaowang comparisonofsignificantcarotidstenosisfornasopharyngealcarcinomabetweenintensitymodulatedradiotherapyandconventionaltwodimensionalradiotherapy AT zhouhaihong comparisonofsignificantcarotidstenosisfornasopharyngealcarcinomabetweenintensitymodulatedradiotherapyandconventionaltwodimensionalradiotherapy AT fanshengnuo comparisonofsignificantcarotidstenosisfornasopharyngealcarcinomabetweenintensitymodulatedradiotherapyandconventionaltwodimensionalradiotherapy AT zhengyuqiu comparisonofsignificantcarotidstenosisfornasopharyngealcarcinomabetweenintensitymodulatedradiotherapyandconventionaltwodimensionalradiotherapy AT zhangbei comparisonofsignificantcarotidstenosisfornasopharyngealcarcinomabetweenintensitymodulatedradiotherapyandconventionaltwodimensionalradiotherapy AT zhaozhongyan comparisonofsignificantcarotidstenosisfornasopharyngealcarcinomabetweenintensitymodulatedradiotherapyandconventionaltwodimensionalradiotherapy AT xiaosonghua comparisonofsignificantcarotidstenosisfornasopharyngealcarcinomabetweenintensitymodulatedradiotherapyandconventionaltwodimensionalradiotherapy AT baishoumin comparisonofsignificantcarotidstenosisfornasopharyngealcarcinomabetweenintensitymodulatedradiotherapyandconventionaltwodimensionalradiotherapy AT liujun comparisonofsignificantcarotidstenosisfornasopharyngealcarcinomabetweenintensitymodulatedradiotherapyandconventionaltwodimensionalradiotherapy |