Cargando…

Comparison of Significant Carotid Stenosis for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma between Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Conventional Two-Dimensional Radiotherapy

Radiotherapy (RT) serves as the most efficient treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and can cause carotid stenosis. This work compared the incidence of significant carotid stenosis between intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2D-RT) for NPC a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liao, Wang, Zhou, Haihong, Fan, Shengnuo, Zheng, Yuqiu, Zhang, Bei, Zhao, Zhongyan, Xiao, Songhua, Bai, Shoumin, Liu, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6141472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30224668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32398-y
_version_ 1783355703146053632
author Liao, Wang
Zhou, Haihong
Fan, Shengnuo
Zheng, Yuqiu
Zhang, Bei
Zhao, Zhongyan
Xiao, Songhua
Bai, Shoumin
Liu, Jun
author_facet Liao, Wang
Zhou, Haihong
Fan, Shengnuo
Zheng, Yuqiu
Zhang, Bei
Zhao, Zhongyan
Xiao, Songhua
Bai, Shoumin
Liu, Jun
author_sort Liao, Wang
collection PubMed
description Radiotherapy (RT) serves as the most efficient treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and can cause carotid stenosis. This work compared the incidence of significant carotid stenosis between intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2D-RT) for NPC and explored the risk factors. We retrospectively reviewed 233 cases with NPC who underwent carotid ultrasound post IMRT or 2D-RT from 2006 to 2015. The incidence of significant stenosis after RT was 19.3%. Significant stenosis was identified in 20 (14.6%) of 137 patients treated with IMRT and 25 (26.0%) of 96 patients with 2D-RT, respectively (p = 0.035). Multivariate logistic analysis indicated age (odds ratio = 1.054, 95% CI = 1.011–1.099, p = 0.014), radiation technique (IMRT) (odds ratio = 0.471, 95%CI = 0.241–0.919, p = 0.027) and time interval (odds ratio = 1.068, 95%CI = 1.033–1.105, p = 0.001) as independent predictors for significant carotid stenosis. Our study suggests that IMRT was associated with decreased incidence of significant carotid stenosis versus 2D-RT for NPC. Prevention and carotid ultrasound should be considered for older NPC survivors with longer interval from RT, especially those treated with 2D-RT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6141472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61414722018-09-20 Comparison of Significant Carotid Stenosis for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma between Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Conventional Two-Dimensional Radiotherapy Liao, Wang Zhou, Haihong Fan, Shengnuo Zheng, Yuqiu Zhang, Bei Zhao, Zhongyan Xiao, Songhua Bai, Shoumin Liu, Jun Sci Rep Article Radiotherapy (RT) serves as the most efficient treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and can cause carotid stenosis. This work compared the incidence of significant carotid stenosis between intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2D-RT) for NPC and explored the risk factors. We retrospectively reviewed 233 cases with NPC who underwent carotid ultrasound post IMRT or 2D-RT from 2006 to 2015. The incidence of significant stenosis after RT was 19.3%. Significant stenosis was identified in 20 (14.6%) of 137 patients treated with IMRT and 25 (26.0%) of 96 patients with 2D-RT, respectively (p = 0.035). Multivariate logistic analysis indicated age (odds ratio = 1.054, 95% CI = 1.011–1.099, p = 0.014), radiation technique (IMRT) (odds ratio = 0.471, 95%CI = 0.241–0.919, p = 0.027) and time interval (odds ratio = 1.068, 95%CI = 1.033–1.105, p = 0.001) as independent predictors for significant carotid stenosis. Our study suggests that IMRT was associated with decreased incidence of significant carotid stenosis versus 2D-RT for NPC. Prevention and carotid ultrasound should be considered for older NPC survivors with longer interval from RT, especially those treated with 2D-RT. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6141472/ /pubmed/30224668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32398-y Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Liao, Wang
Zhou, Haihong
Fan, Shengnuo
Zheng, Yuqiu
Zhang, Bei
Zhao, Zhongyan
Xiao, Songhua
Bai, Shoumin
Liu, Jun
Comparison of Significant Carotid Stenosis for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma between Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Conventional Two-Dimensional Radiotherapy
title Comparison of Significant Carotid Stenosis for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma between Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Conventional Two-Dimensional Radiotherapy
title_full Comparison of Significant Carotid Stenosis for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma between Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Conventional Two-Dimensional Radiotherapy
title_fullStr Comparison of Significant Carotid Stenosis for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma between Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Conventional Two-Dimensional Radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Significant Carotid Stenosis for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma between Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Conventional Two-Dimensional Radiotherapy
title_short Comparison of Significant Carotid Stenosis for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma between Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Conventional Two-Dimensional Radiotherapy
title_sort comparison of significant carotid stenosis for nasopharyngeal carcinoma between intensity-modulated radiotherapy and conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6141472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30224668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32398-y
work_keys_str_mv AT liaowang comparisonofsignificantcarotidstenosisfornasopharyngealcarcinomabetweenintensitymodulatedradiotherapyandconventionaltwodimensionalradiotherapy
AT zhouhaihong comparisonofsignificantcarotidstenosisfornasopharyngealcarcinomabetweenintensitymodulatedradiotherapyandconventionaltwodimensionalradiotherapy
AT fanshengnuo comparisonofsignificantcarotidstenosisfornasopharyngealcarcinomabetweenintensitymodulatedradiotherapyandconventionaltwodimensionalradiotherapy
AT zhengyuqiu comparisonofsignificantcarotidstenosisfornasopharyngealcarcinomabetweenintensitymodulatedradiotherapyandconventionaltwodimensionalradiotherapy
AT zhangbei comparisonofsignificantcarotidstenosisfornasopharyngealcarcinomabetweenintensitymodulatedradiotherapyandconventionaltwodimensionalradiotherapy
AT zhaozhongyan comparisonofsignificantcarotidstenosisfornasopharyngealcarcinomabetweenintensitymodulatedradiotherapyandconventionaltwodimensionalradiotherapy
AT xiaosonghua comparisonofsignificantcarotidstenosisfornasopharyngealcarcinomabetweenintensitymodulatedradiotherapyandconventionaltwodimensionalradiotherapy
AT baishoumin comparisonofsignificantcarotidstenosisfornasopharyngealcarcinomabetweenintensitymodulatedradiotherapyandconventionaltwodimensionalradiotherapy
AT liujun comparisonofsignificantcarotidstenosisfornasopharyngealcarcinomabetweenintensitymodulatedradiotherapyandconventionaltwodimensionalradiotherapy