Cargando…
How morphological development can guide evolution
Organisms result from adaptive processes interacting across different time scales. One such interaction is that between development and evolution. Models have shown that development sweeps over several traits in a single agent, sometimes exposing promising static traits. Subsequent evolution can the...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6141532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30224743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31868-7 |
_version_ | 1783355716261642240 |
---|---|
author | Kriegman, Sam Cheney, Nick Bongard, Josh |
author_facet | Kriegman, Sam Cheney, Nick Bongard, Josh |
author_sort | Kriegman, Sam |
collection | PubMed |
description | Organisms result from adaptive processes interacting across different time scales. One such interaction is that between development and evolution. Models have shown that development sweeps over several traits in a single agent, sometimes exposing promising static traits. Subsequent evolution can then canalize these rare traits. Thus, development can, under the right conditions, increase evolvability. Here, we report on a previously unknown phenomenon when embodied agents are allowed to develop and evolve: Evolution discovers body plans robust to control changes, these body plans become genetically assimilated, yet controllers for these agents are not assimilated. This allows evolution to continue climbing fitness gradients by tinkering with the developmental programs for controllers within these permissive body plans. This exposes a previously unknown detail about the Baldwin effect: instead of all useful traits becoming genetically assimilated, only traits that render the agent robust to changes in other traits become assimilated. We refer to this as differential canalization. This finding also has implications for the evolutionary design of artificial and embodied agents such as robots: robots robust to internal changes in their controllers may also be robust to external changes in their environment, such as transferal from simulation to reality or deployment in novel environments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6141532 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61415322018-09-20 How morphological development can guide evolution Kriegman, Sam Cheney, Nick Bongard, Josh Sci Rep Article Organisms result from adaptive processes interacting across different time scales. One such interaction is that between development and evolution. Models have shown that development sweeps over several traits in a single agent, sometimes exposing promising static traits. Subsequent evolution can then canalize these rare traits. Thus, development can, under the right conditions, increase evolvability. Here, we report on a previously unknown phenomenon when embodied agents are allowed to develop and evolve: Evolution discovers body plans robust to control changes, these body plans become genetically assimilated, yet controllers for these agents are not assimilated. This allows evolution to continue climbing fitness gradients by tinkering with the developmental programs for controllers within these permissive body plans. This exposes a previously unknown detail about the Baldwin effect: instead of all useful traits becoming genetically assimilated, only traits that render the agent robust to changes in other traits become assimilated. We refer to this as differential canalization. This finding also has implications for the evolutionary design of artificial and embodied agents such as robots: robots robust to internal changes in their controllers may also be robust to external changes in their environment, such as transferal from simulation to reality or deployment in novel environments. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6141532/ /pubmed/30224743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31868-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Kriegman, Sam Cheney, Nick Bongard, Josh How morphological development can guide evolution |
title | How morphological development can guide evolution |
title_full | How morphological development can guide evolution |
title_fullStr | How morphological development can guide evolution |
title_full_unstemmed | How morphological development can guide evolution |
title_short | How morphological development can guide evolution |
title_sort | how morphological development can guide evolution |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6141532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30224743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31868-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kriegmansam howmorphologicaldevelopmentcanguideevolution AT cheneynick howmorphologicaldevelopmentcanguideevolution AT bongardjosh howmorphologicaldevelopmentcanguideevolution |