Cargando…

How morphological development can guide evolution

Organisms result from adaptive processes interacting across different time scales. One such interaction is that between development and evolution. Models have shown that development sweeps over several traits in a single agent, sometimes exposing promising static traits. Subsequent evolution can the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kriegman, Sam, Cheney, Nick, Bongard, Josh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6141532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30224743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31868-7
_version_ 1783355716261642240
author Kriegman, Sam
Cheney, Nick
Bongard, Josh
author_facet Kriegman, Sam
Cheney, Nick
Bongard, Josh
author_sort Kriegman, Sam
collection PubMed
description Organisms result from adaptive processes interacting across different time scales. One such interaction is that between development and evolution. Models have shown that development sweeps over several traits in a single agent, sometimes exposing promising static traits. Subsequent evolution can then canalize these rare traits. Thus, development can, under the right conditions, increase evolvability. Here, we report on a previously unknown phenomenon when embodied agents are allowed to develop and evolve: Evolution discovers body plans robust to control changes, these body plans become genetically assimilated, yet controllers for these agents are not assimilated. This allows evolution to continue climbing fitness gradients by tinkering with the developmental programs for controllers within these permissive body plans. This exposes a previously unknown detail about the Baldwin effect: instead of all useful traits becoming genetically assimilated, only traits that render the agent robust to changes in other traits become assimilated. We refer to this as differential canalization. This finding also has implications for the evolutionary design of artificial and embodied agents such as robots: robots robust to internal changes in their controllers may also be robust to external changes in their environment, such as transferal from simulation to reality or deployment in novel environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6141532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61415322018-09-20 How morphological development can guide evolution Kriegman, Sam Cheney, Nick Bongard, Josh Sci Rep Article Organisms result from adaptive processes interacting across different time scales. One such interaction is that between development and evolution. Models have shown that development sweeps over several traits in a single agent, sometimes exposing promising static traits. Subsequent evolution can then canalize these rare traits. Thus, development can, under the right conditions, increase evolvability. Here, we report on a previously unknown phenomenon when embodied agents are allowed to develop and evolve: Evolution discovers body plans robust to control changes, these body plans become genetically assimilated, yet controllers for these agents are not assimilated. This allows evolution to continue climbing fitness gradients by tinkering with the developmental programs for controllers within these permissive body plans. This exposes a previously unknown detail about the Baldwin effect: instead of all useful traits becoming genetically assimilated, only traits that render the agent robust to changes in other traits become assimilated. We refer to this as differential canalization. This finding also has implications for the evolutionary design of artificial and embodied agents such as robots: robots robust to internal changes in their controllers may also be robust to external changes in their environment, such as transferal from simulation to reality or deployment in novel environments. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6141532/ /pubmed/30224743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31868-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Kriegman, Sam
Cheney, Nick
Bongard, Josh
How morphological development can guide evolution
title How morphological development can guide evolution
title_full How morphological development can guide evolution
title_fullStr How morphological development can guide evolution
title_full_unstemmed How morphological development can guide evolution
title_short How morphological development can guide evolution
title_sort how morphological development can guide evolution
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6141532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30224743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31868-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kriegmansam howmorphologicaldevelopmentcanguideevolution
AT cheneynick howmorphologicaldevelopmentcanguideevolution
AT bongardjosh howmorphologicaldevelopmentcanguideevolution