Cargando…
Attentional Guidance from Multiple Working Memory Representations: Evidence from Eye Movements
Recent studies have shown that the representation of an item in visual working memory (VWM) can bias the deployment of attention to stimuli in the visual scene possessing the same features. When multiple item representations are simultaneously held in VWM, whether these representations, especially t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6141570/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30224710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32144-4 |
_version_ | 1783355725133643776 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Bao Liu, Shuhui Doro, Mattia Galfano, Giovanni |
author_facet | Zhang, Bao Liu, Shuhui Doro, Mattia Galfano, Giovanni |
author_sort | Zhang, Bao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent studies have shown that the representation of an item in visual working memory (VWM) can bias the deployment of attention to stimuli in the visual scene possessing the same features. When multiple item representations are simultaneously held in VWM, whether these representations, especially those held in a non-prioritized or accessory status, are able to bias attention, is still controversial. In the present study we adopted an eye tracking technique to shed light on this issue. In particular, we implemented a manipulation aimed at prioritizing one of the VWM representation to an active status, and tested whether attention could be guided by both the prioritized and the accessory representations when they reappeared as distractors in a visual search task. Notably, in Experiment 1, an analysis of first fixation proportion (FFP) revealed that both the prioritized and the accessory representations were able to capture attention suggesting a significant attentional guidance effect. However, such effect was not present in manual response times (RT). Most critically, in Experiment 2, we used a more robust experimental design controlling for different factors that might have played a role in shaping these findings. The results showed evidence for attentional guidance from the accessory representation in both manual RTs and FFPs. Interestingly, FFPs showed a stronger attentional bias for the prioritized representation than for the accessory representation across experiments. The overall findings suggest that multiple VWM representations, even the accessory representation, can simultaneously interact with visual attention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6141570 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61415702018-09-20 Attentional Guidance from Multiple Working Memory Representations: Evidence from Eye Movements Zhang, Bao Liu, Shuhui Doro, Mattia Galfano, Giovanni Sci Rep Article Recent studies have shown that the representation of an item in visual working memory (VWM) can bias the deployment of attention to stimuli in the visual scene possessing the same features. When multiple item representations are simultaneously held in VWM, whether these representations, especially those held in a non-prioritized or accessory status, are able to bias attention, is still controversial. In the present study we adopted an eye tracking technique to shed light on this issue. In particular, we implemented a manipulation aimed at prioritizing one of the VWM representation to an active status, and tested whether attention could be guided by both the prioritized and the accessory representations when they reappeared as distractors in a visual search task. Notably, in Experiment 1, an analysis of first fixation proportion (FFP) revealed that both the prioritized and the accessory representations were able to capture attention suggesting a significant attentional guidance effect. However, such effect was not present in manual response times (RT). Most critically, in Experiment 2, we used a more robust experimental design controlling for different factors that might have played a role in shaping these findings. The results showed evidence for attentional guidance from the accessory representation in both manual RTs and FFPs. Interestingly, FFPs showed a stronger attentional bias for the prioritized representation than for the accessory representation across experiments. The overall findings suggest that multiple VWM representations, even the accessory representation, can simultaneously interact with visual attention. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6141570/ /pubmed/30224710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32144-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Zhang, Bao Liu, Shuhui Doro, Mattia Galfano, Giovanni Attentional Guidance from Multiple Working Memory Representations: Evidence from Eye Movements |
title | Attentional Guidance from Multiple Working Memory Representations: Evidence from Eye Movements |
title_full | Attentional Guidance from Multiple Working Memory Representations: Evidence from Eye Movements |
title_fullStr | Attentional Guidance from Multiple Working Memory Representations: Evidence from Eye Movements |
title_full_unstemmed | Attentional Guidance from Multiple Working Memory Representations: Evidence from Eye Movements |
title_short | Attentional Guidance from Multiple Working Memory Representations: Evidence from Eye Movements |
title_sort | attentional guidance from multiple working memory representations: evidence from eye movements |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6141570/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30224710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32144-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangbao attentionalguidancefrommultipleworkingmemoryrepresentationsevidencefromeyemovements AT liushuhui attentionalguidancefrommultipleworkingmemoryrepresentationsevidencefromeyemovements AT doromattia attentionalguidancefrommultipleworkingmemoryrepresentationsevidencefromeyemovements AT galfanogiovanni attentionalguidancefrommultipleworkingmemoryrepresentationsevidencefromeyemovements |