Cargando…

Bridging the Data Gap From in vitro Toxicity Testing to Chemical Safety Assessment Through Computational Modeling

Chemical toxicity testing is moving steadily toward a human cell and organoid-based in vitro approach for reasons including scientific relevancy, efficiency, cost, and ethical rightfulness. Inferring human health risk from chemical exposure based on in vitro testing data is a challenging task, facin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Qiang, Li, Jin, Middleton, Alistair, Bhattacharya, Sudin, Conolly, Rory B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6141783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30255008
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00261
_version_ 1783355770051493888
author Zhang, Qiang
Li, Jin
Middleton, Alistair
Bhattacharya, Sudin
Conolly, Rory B.
author_facet Zhang, Qiang
Li, Jin
Middleton, Alistair
Bhattacharya, Sudin
Conolly, Rory B.
author_sort Zhang, Qiang
collection PubMed
description Chemical toxicity testing is moving steadily toward a human cell and organoid-based in vitro approach for reasons including scientific relevancy, efficiency, cost, and ethical rightfulness. Inferring human health risk from chemical exposure based on in vitro testing data is a challenging task, facing various data gaps along the way. This review identifies these gaps and makes a case for the in silico approach of computational dose-response and extrapolation modeling to address many of the challenges. Mathematical models that can mechanistically describe chemical toxicokinetics (TK) and toxicodynamics (TD), for both in vitro and in vivo conditions, are the founding pieces in this regard. Identifying toxicity pathways and in vitro point of departure (PoD) associated with adverse health outcomes requires an understanding of the molecular key events in the interacting transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome. Such an understanding will in turn help determine the sets of sensitive biomarkers to be measured in vitro and the scope of toxicity pathways to be modeled in silico. In vitro data reporting both pathway perturbation and chemical biokinetics in the culture medium serve to calibrate the toxicity pathway and virtual tissue models, which can then help predict PoDs in response to chemical dosimetry experienced by cells in vivo. Two types of in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) are needed. (1) For toxic effects involving systemic regulations, such as endocrine disruption, organism-level adverse outcome pathway (AOP) models are needed to extrapolate in vitro toxicity pathway perturbation to in vivo PoD. (2) Physiologically-based toxicokinetic (PBTK) modeling is needed to extrapolate in vitro PoD dose metrics into external doses for expected exposure scenarios. Linked PBTK and TD models can explore the parameter space to recapitulate human population variability in response to chemical insults. While challenges remain for applying these modeling tools to support in vitro toxicity testing, they open the door toward population-stratified and personalized risk assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6141783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61417832018-09-25 Bridging the Data Gap From in vitro Toxicity Testing to Chemical Safety Assessment Through Computational Modeling Zhang, Qiang Li, Jin Middleton, Alistair Bhattacharya, Sudin Conolly, Rory B. Front Public Health Public Health Chemical toxicity testing is moving steadily toward a human cell and organoid-based in vitro approach for reasons including scientific relevancy, efficiency, cost, and ethical rightfulness. Inferring human health risk from chemical exposure based on in vitro testing data is a challenging task, facing various data gaps along the way. This review identifies these gaps and makes a case for the in silico approach of computational dose-response and extrapolation modeling to address many of the challenges. Mathematical models that can mechanistically describe chemical toxicokinetics (TK) and toxicodynamics (TD), for both in vitro and in vivo conditions, are the founding pieces in this regard. Identifying toxicity pathways and in vitro point of departure (PoD) associated with adverse health outcomes requires an understanding of the molecular key events in the interacting transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome. Such an understanding will in turn help determine the sets of sensitive biomarkers to be measured in vitro and the scope of toxicity pathways to be modeled in silico. In vitro data reporting both pathway perturbation and chemical biokinetics in the culture medium serve to calibrate the toxicity pathway and virtual tissue models, which can then help predict PoDs in response to chemical dosimetry experienced by cells in vivo. Two types of in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) are needed. (1) For toxic effects involving systemic regulations, such as endocrine disruption, organism-level adverse outcome pathway (AOP) models are needed to extrapolate in vitro toxicity pathway perturbation to in vivo PoD. (2) Physiologically-based toxicokinetic (PBTK) modeling is needed to extrapolate in vitro PoD dose metrics into external doses for expected exposure scenarios. Linked PBTK and TD models can explore the parameter space to recapitulate human population variability in response to chemical insults. While challenges remain for applying these modeling tools to support in vitro toxicity testing, they open the door toward population-stratified and personalized risk assessment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6141783/ /pubmed/30255008 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00261 Text en Copyright © 2018 Zhang, Li, Middleton, Bhattacharya and Conolly. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Zhang, Qiang
Li, Jin
Middleton, Alistair
Bhattacharya, Sudin
Conolly, Rory B.
Bridging the Data Gap From in vitro Toxicity Testing to Chemical Safety Assessment Through Computational Modeling
title Bridging the Data Gap From in vitro Toxicity Testing to Chemical Safety Assessment Through Computational Modeling
title_full Bridging the Data Gap From in vitro Toxicity Testing to Chemical Safety Assessment Through Computational Modeling
title_fullStr Bridging the Data Gap From in vitro Toxicity Testing to Chemical Safety Assessment Through Computational Modeling
title_full_unstemmed Bridging the Data Gap From in vitro Toxicity Testing to Chemical Safety Assessment Through Computational Modeling
title_short Bridging the Data Gap From in vitro Toxicity Testing to Chemical Safety Assessment Through Computational Modeling
title_sort bridging the data gap from in vitro toxicity testing to chemical safety assessment through computational modeling
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6141783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30255008
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00261
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangqiang bridgingthedatagapfrominvitrotoxicitytestingtochemicalsafetyassessmentthroughcomputationalmodeling
AT lijin bridgingthedatagapfrominvitrotoxicitytestingtochemicalsafetyassessmentthroughcomputationalmodeling
AT middletonalistair bridgingthedatagapfrominvitrotoxicitytestingtochemicalsafetyassessmentthroughcomputationalmodeling
AT bhattacharyasudin bridgingthedatagapfrominvitrotoxicitytestingtochemicalsafetyassessmentthroughcomputationalmodeling
AT conollyroryb bridgingthedatagapfrominvitrotoxicitytestingtochemicalsafetyassessmentthroughcomputationalmodeling