Cargando…

Developing an Integrative Treatment Program for Cancer-Related Fatigue Using Stakeholder Engagement – A Qualitative Study

Background: Although cancer-related fatigue (CRF) has gained increased attention in the past decade, it remains difficult to treat. An integrative approach combining conventional and complementary medicine interventions seems highly promising. Treatment programs are more likely to be effective if th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Canella, Claudia, Mikolasek, Michael, Rostock, Matthias, Beyer, Jörg, Guckenberger, Matthias, Jenewein, Josef, Linka, Esther, Six, Claudia, Stoll, Sarah, Stupp, Roger, Witt, Claudia M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6142112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29161912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1534735417740629
_version_ 1783355809440202752
author Canella, Claudia
Mikolasek, Michael
Rostock, Matthias
Beyer, Jörg
Guckenberger, Matthias
Jenewein, Josef
Linka, Esther
Six, Claudia
Stoll, Sarah
Stupp, Roger
Witt, Claudia M.
author_facet Canella, Claudia
Mikolasek, Michael
Rostock, Matthias
Beyer, Jörg
Guckenberger, Matthias
Jenewein, Josef
Linka, Esther
Six, Claudia
Stoll, Sarah
Stupp, Roger
Witt, Claudia M.
author_sort Canella, Claudia
collection PubMed
description Background: Although cancer-related fatigue (CRF) has gained increased attention in the past decade, it remains difficult to treat. An integrative approach combining conventional and complementary medicine interventions seems highly promising. Treatment programs are more likely to be effective if the needs and interests of the people involved are well represented. This can be achieved through stakeholder engagement. Objectives: The aim of the study was to develop an integrative CRF treatment program using stakeholder engagement and to compare it to an expert version. Method: In a qualitative study, a total of 22 stakeholders (4 oncologists, 1 radiation-oncologist, 1 psycho-oncologist, 5 nurses/nurse experts, 9 patients, 1 patient family member, 1 representative of a local Swiss Cancer League) were interviewed either face-to-face or in a focus group setting. For data analysis, qualitative content analysis was used. Results: With stakeholder engagement, the integrative CRF treatment program was adapted to usual care using a prioritizing approach and allowing more patient choice. Unlike the expert version, in which all intervention options were on the same level, the stakeholder engagement process resulted in a program with 3 different levels. The first level includes mandatory nonpharmacological interventions, the second includes nonpharmacological choice-based interventions, and the third includes pharmacological interventions for severe CRF. The resulting stakeholder based integrative CRF treatment program was implemented as clinical practice guideline at our clinic (Institute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University Hospital Zurich). Conclusion: Through the stakeholder engagement approach, we integrated the needs and preferences of people who are directly affected by CRF. This resulted in an integrative CRF treatment program with graded recommendations for interventions and therefore potentially greater sustainability in a usual care setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6142112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61421122018-09-20 Developing an Integrative Treatment Program for Cancer-Related Fatigue Using Stakeholder Engagement – A Qualitative Study Canella, Claudia Mikolasek, Michael Rostock, Matthias Beyer, Jörg Guckenberger, Matthias Jenewein, Josef Linka, Esther Six, Claudia Stoll, Sarah Stupp, Roger Witt, Claudia M. Integr Cancer Ther Research Articles Background: Although cancer-related fatigue (CRF) has gained increased attention in the past decade, it remains difficult to treat. An integrative approach combining conventional and complementary medicine interventions seems highly promising. Treatment programs are more likely to be effective if the needs and interests of the people involved are well represented. This can be achieved through stakeholder engagement. Objectives: The aim of the study was to develop an integrative CRF treatment program using stakeholder engagement and to compare it to an expert version. Method: In a qualitative study, a total of 22 stakeholders (4 oncologists, 1 radiation-oncologist, 1 psycho-oncologist, 5 nurses/nurse experts, 9 patients, 1 patient family member, 1 representative of a local Swiss Cancer League) were interviewed either face-to-face or in a focus group setting. For data analysis, qualitative content analysis was used. Results: With stakeholder engagement, the integrative CRF treatment program was adapted to usual care using a prioritizing approach and allowing more patient choice. Unlike the expert version, in which all intervention options were on the same level, the stakeholder engagement process resulted in a program with 3 different levels. The first level includes mandatory nonpharmacological interventions, the second includes nonpharmacological choice-based interventions, and the third includes pharmacological interventions for severe CRF. The resulting stakeholder based integrative CRF treatment program was implemented as clinical practice guideline at our clinic (Institute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University Hospital Zurich). Conclusion: Through the stakeholder engagement approach, we integrated the needs and preferences of people who are directly affected by CRF. This resulted in an integrative CRF treatment program with graded recommendations for interventions and therefore potentially greater sustainability in a usual care setting. SAGE Publications 2017-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6142112/ /pubmed/29161912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1534735417740629 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Articles
Canella, Claudia
Mikolasek, Michael
Rostock, Matthias
Beyer, Jörg
Guckenberger, Matthias
Jenewein, Josef
Linka, Esther
Six, Claudia
Stoll, Sarah
Stupp, Roger
Witt, Claudia M.
Developing an Integrative Treatment Program for Cancer-Related Fatigue Using Stakeholder Engagement – A Qualitative Study
title Developing an Integrative Treatment Program for Cancer-Related Fatigue Using Stakeholder Engagement – A Qualitative Study
title_full Developing an Integrative Treatment Program for Cancer-Related Fatigue Using Stakeholder Engagement – A Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Developing an Integrative Treatment Program for Cancer-Related Fatigue Using Stakeholder Engagement – A Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Developing an Integrative Treatment Program for Cancer-Related Fatigue Using Stakeholder Engagement – A Qualitative Study
title_short Developing an Integrative Treatment Program for Cancer-Related Fatigue Using Stakeholder Engagement – A Qualitative Study
title_sort developing an integrative treatment program for cancer-related fatigue using stakeholder engagement – a qualitative study
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6142112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29161912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1534735417740629
work_keys_str_mv AT canellaclaudia developinganintegrativetreatmentprogramforcancerrelatedfatigueusingstakeholderengagementaqualitativestudy
AT mikolasekmichael developinganintegrativetreatmentprogramforcancerrelatedfatigueusingstakeholderengagementaqualitativestudy
AT rostockmatthias developinganintegrativetreatmentprogramforcancerrelatedfatigueusingstakeholderengagementaqualitativestudy
AT beyerjorg developinganintegrativetreatmentprogramforcancerrelatedfatigueusingstakeholderengagementaqualitativestudy
AT guckenbergermatthias developinganintegrativetreatmentprogramforcancerrelatedfatigueusingstakeholderengagementaqualitativestudy
AT jeneweinjosef developinganintegrativetreatmentprogramforcancerrelatedfatigueusingstakeholderengagementaqualitativestudy
AT linkaesther developinganintegrativetreatmentprogramforcancerrelatedfatigueusingstakeholderengagementaqualitativestudy
AT sixclaudia developinganintegrativetreatmentprogramforcancerrelatedfatigueusingstakeholderengagementaqualitativestudy
AT stollsarah developinganintegrativetreatmentprogramforcancerrelatedfatigueusingstakeholderengagementaqualitativestudy
AT stupproger developinganintegrativetreatmentprogramforcancerrelatedfatigueusingstakeholderengagementaqualitativestudy
AT wittclaudiam developinganintegrativetreatmentprogramforcancerrelatedfatigueusingstakeholderengagementaqualitativestudy