Cargando…
USPSTF Testicular Examination Nomination–Self-Examinations and Examinations in a Clinical Setting
In 2004, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) published a Grade D recommendation for both testicular self-examination (TSE) and clinical evaluation to screen for testicular cancer in asymptomatic males. This review committee reaffirmed these recommendations in 2009 and again in 2011 (Tes...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6142159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29717912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1557988318768597 |
_version_ | 1783355819311497216 |
---|---|
author | Fadich, Ana Giorgianni, Salvatore J. Rovito, Michael J. Pecchia, Gregory A. Bonhomme, Jean J. Adams, Wesley B. Stephenson, Colin L. Mesa-Morales, Felipe E. Sparkes, Justin Scott |
author_facet | Fadich, Ana Giorgianni, Salvatore J. Rovito, Michael J. Pecchia, Gregory A. Bonhomme, Jean J. Adams, Wesley B. Stephenson, Colin L. Mesa-Morales, Felipe E. Sparkes, Justin Scott |
author_sort | Fadich, Ana |
collection | PubMed |
description | In 2004, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) published a Grade D recommendation for both testicular self-examination (TSE) and clinical evaluation to screen for testicular cancer in asymptomatic males. This review committee reaffirmed these recommendations in 2009 and again in 2011 (Testicular Cancer: Screening Release Date: April 2011. Final Update Summary: Testicular Cancer: Screening. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. September 2016). The 2011 USPSTF review found no significant evidence that would warrant a change from the last full review in 2004. We believe that the USPSTF erred in its assessments. As acknowledged in the task force report, testicular cancer is not believed to be preventable, and treatment of early detected testicular cancer is generally associated with very favorable outcomes; it is our belief therefore that every encouragement should be given to early detection. We are therefore requesting that the USPSTF review the D rating for testicular examination, both in a clinical setting and as self-examination. We are requesting this, as recent studies and public health warrant a change in grade. The new studies build on earlier studies that support the benefits of regular screening by individuals and their physicians. Further, and equally important, we believe that the current grade and attendant information confuses men and boys about the importance of self-care and wellness and continues to inadvertently reinforce negative cultural attitudes. We believe that adjusting the rating to a Grade B is both warranted and necessary. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6142159 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61421592018-09-20 USPSTF Testicular Examination Nomination–Self-Examinations and Examinations in a Clinical Setting Fadich, Ana Giorgianni, Salvatore J. Rovito, Michael J. Pecchia, Gregory A. Bonhomme, Jean J. Adams, Wesley B. Stephenson, Colin L. Mesa-Morales, Felipe E. Sparkes, Justin Scott Am J Mens Health Original Articles In 2004, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) published a Grade D recommendation for both testicular self-examination (TSE) and clinical evaluation to screen for testicular cancer in asymptomatic males. This review committee reaffirmed these recommendations in 2009 and again in 2011 (Testicular Cancer: Screening Release Date: April 2011. Final Update Summary: Testicular Cancer: Screening. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. September 2016). The 2011 USPSTF review found no significant evidence that would warrant a change from the last full review in 2004. We believe that the USPSTF erred in its assessments. As acknowledged in the task force report, testicular cancer is not believed to be preventable, and treatment of early detected testicular cancer is generally associated with very favorable outcomes; it is our belief therefore that every encouragement should be given to early detection. We are therefore requesting that the USPSTF review the D rating for testicular examination, both in a clinical setting and as self-examination. We are requesting this, as recent studies and public health warrant a change in grade. The new studies build on earlier studies that support the benefits of regular screening by individuals and their physicians. Further, and equally important, we believe that the current grade and attendant information confuses men and boys about the importance of self-care and wellness and continues to inadvertently reinforce negative cultural attitudes. We believe that adjusting the rating to a Grade B is both warranted and necessary. SAGE Publications 2018-05-02 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6142159/ /pubmed/29717912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1557988318768597 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Fadich, Ana Giorgianni, Salvatore J. Rovito, Michael J. Pecchia, Gregory A. Bonhomme, Jean J. Adams, Wesley B. Stephenson, Colin L. Mesa-Morales, Felipe E. Sparkes, Justin Scott USPSTF Testicular Examination Nomination–Self-Examinations and Examinations in a Clinical Setting |
title | USPSTF Testicular Examination Nomination–Self-Examinations and Examinations in a Clinical Setting |
title_full | USPSTF Testicular Examination Nomination–Self-Examinations and Examinations in a Clinical Setting |
title_fullStr | USPSTF Testicular Examination Nomination–Self-Examinations and Examinations in a Clinical Setting |
title_full_unstemmed | USPSTF Testicular Examination Nomination–Self-Examinations and Examinations in a Clinical Setting |
title_short | USPSTF Testicular Examination Nomination–Self-Examinations and Examinations in a Clinical Setting |
title_sort | uspstf testicular examination nomination–self-examinations and examinations in a clinical setting |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6142159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29717912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1557988318768597 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fadichana uspstftesticularexaminationnominationselfexaminationsandexaminationsinaclinicalsetting AT giorgiannisalvatorej uspstftesticularexaminationnominationselfexaminationsandexaminationsinaclinicalsetting AT rovitomichaelj uspstftesticularexaminationnominationselfexaminationsandexaminationsinaclinicalsetting AT pecchiagregorya uspstftesticularexaminationnominationselfexaminationsandexaminationsinaclinicalsetting AT bonhommejeanj uspstftesticularexaminationnominationselfexaminationsandexaminationsinaclinicalsetting AT adamswesleyb uspstftesticularexaminationnominationselfexaminationsandexaminationsinaclinicalsetting AT stephensoncolinl uspstftesticularexaminationnominationselfexaminationsandexaminationsinaclinicalsetting AT mesamoralesfelipee uspstftesticularexaminationnominationselfexaminationsandexaminationsinaclinicalsetting AT sparkesjustinscott uspstftesticularexaminationnominationselfexaminationsandexaminationsinaclinicalsetting |