Cargando…

USPSTF Testicular Examination Nomination–Self-Examinations and Examinations in a Clinical Setting

In 2004, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) published a Grade D recommendation for both testicular self-examination (TSE) and clinical evaluation to screen for testicular cancer in asymptomatic males. This review committee reaffirmed these recommendations in 2009 and again in 2011 (Tes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fadich, Ana, Giorgianni, Salvatore J., Rovito, Michael J., Pecchia, Gregory A., Bonhomme, Jean J., Adams, Wesley B., Stephenson, Colin L., Mesa-Morales, Felipe E., Sparkes, Justin Scott
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6142159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29717912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1557988318768597
_version_ 1783355819311497216
author Fadich, Ana
Giorgianni, Salvatore J.
Rovito, Michael J.
Pecchia, Gregory A.
Bonhomme, Jean J.
Adams, Wesley B.
Stephenson, Colin L.
Mesa-Morales, Felipe E.
Sparkes, Justin Scott
author_facet Fadich, Ana
Giorgianni, Salvatore J.
Rovito, Michael J.
Pecchia, Gregory A.
Bonhomme, Jean J.
Adams, Wesley B.
Stephenson, Colin L.
Mesa-Morales, Felipe E.
Sparkes, Justin Scott
author_sort Fadich, Ana
collection PubMed
description In 2004, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) published a Grade D recommendation for both testicular self-examination (TSE) and clinical evaluation to screen for testicular cancer in asymptomatic males. This review committee reaffirmed these recommendations in 2009 and again in 2011 (Testicular Cancer: Screening Release Date: April 2011. Final Update Summary: Testicular Cancer: Screening. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. September 2016). The 2011 USPSTF review found no significant evidence that would warrant a change from the last full review in 2004. We believe that the USPSTF erred in its assessments. As acknowledged in the task force report, testicular cancer is not believed to be preventable, and treatment of early detected testicular cancer is generally associated with very favorable outcomes; it is our belief therefore that every encouragement should be given to early detection. We are therefore requesting that the USPSTF review the D rating for testicular examination, both in a clinical setting and as self-examination. We are requesting this, as recent studies and public health warrant a change in grade. The new studies build on earlier studies that support the benefits of regular screening by individuals and their physicians. Further, and equally important, we believe that the current grade and attendant information confuses men and boys about the importance of self-care and wellness and continues to inadvertently reinforce negative cultural attitudes. We believe that adjusting the rating to a Grade B is both warranted and necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6142159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61421592018-09-20 USPSTF Testicular Examination Nomination–Self-Examinations and Examinations in a Clinical Setting Fadich, Ana Giorgianni, Salvatore J. Rovito, Michael J. Pecchia, Gregory A. Bonhomme, Jean J. Adams, Wesley B. Stephenson, Colin L. Mesa-Morales, Felipe E. Sparkes, Justin Scott Am J Mens Health Original Articles In 2004, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) published a Grade D recommendation for both testicular self-examination (TSE) and clinical evaluation to screen for testicular cancer in asymptomatic males. This review committee reaffirmed these recommendations in 2009 and again in 2011 (Testicular Cancer: Screening Release Date: April 2011. Final Update Summary: Testicular Cancer: Screening. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. September 2016). The 2011 USPSTF review found no significant evidence that would warrant a change from the last full review in 2004. We believe that the USPSTF erred in its assessments. As acknowledged in the task force report, testicular cancer is not believed to be preventable, and treatment of early detected testicular cancer is generally associated with very favorable outcomes; it is our belief therefore that every encouragement should be given to early detection. We are therefore requesting that the USPSTF review the D rating for testicular examination, both in a clinical setting and as self-examination. We are requesting this, as recent studies and public health warrant a change in grade. The new studies build on earlier studies that support the benefits of regular screening by individuals and their physicians. Further, and equally important, we believe that the current grade and attendant information confuses men and boys about the importance of self-care and wellness and continues to inadvertently reinforce negative cultural attitudes. We believe that adjusting the rating to a Grade B is both warranted and necessary. SAGE Publications 2018-05-02 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6142159/ /pubmed/29717912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1557988318768597 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Fadich, Ana
Giorgianni, Salvatore J.
Rovito, Michael J.
Pecchia, Gregory A.
Bonhomme, Jean J.
Adams, Wesley B.
Stephenson, Colin L.
Mesa-Morales, Felipe E.
Sparkes, Justin Scott
USPSTF Testicular Examination Nomination–Self-Examinations and Examinations in a Clinical Setting
title USPSTF Testicular Examination Nomination–Self-Examinations and Examinations in a Clinical Setting
title_full USPSTF Testicular Examination Nomination–Self-Examinations and Examinations in a Clinical Setting
title_fullStr USPSTF Testicular Examination Nomination–Self-Examinations and Examinations in a Clinical Setting
title_full_unstemmed USPSTF Testicular Examination Nomination–Self-Examinations and Examinations in a Clinical Setting
title_short USPSTF Testicular Examination Nomination–Self-Examinations and Examinations in a Clinical Setting
title_sort uspstf testicular examination nomination–self-examinations and examinations in a clinical setting
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6142159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29717912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1557988318768597
work_keys_str_mv AT fadichana uspstftesticularexaminationnominationselfexaminationsandexaminationsinaclinicalsetting
AT giorgiannisalvatorej uspstftesticularexaminationnominationselfexaminationsandexaminationsinaclinicalsetting
AT rovitomichaelj uspstftesticularexaminationnominationselfexaminationsandexaminationsinaclinicalsetting
AT pecchiagregorya uspstftesticularexaminationnominationselfexaminationsandexaminationsinaclinicalsetting
AT bonhommejeanj uspstftesticularexaminationnominationselfexaminationsandexaminationsinaclinicalsetting
AT adamswesleyb uspstftesticularexaminationnominationselfexaminationsandexaminationsinaclinicalsetting
AT stephensoncolinl uspstftesticularexaminationnominationselfexaminationsandexaminationsinaclinicalsetting
AT mesamoralesfelipee uspstftesticularexaminationnominationselfexaminationsandexaminationsinaclinicalsetting
AT sparkesjustinscott uspstftesticularexaminationnominationselfexaminationsandexaminationsinaclinicalsetting