Cargando…

Should Sex Be Considered an Effect Modifier in the Evaluation of Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness?

We investigated sex as a potential modifier of influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) between 2010–2011 and 2016–2017 in Canada. Overall VE was 49% (95% confidence interval [CI], 43% to 55%) for females and 38% (95% CI, 28% to 46%) for males (absolute difference [AD], 11%; P = .03). Sex differences we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chambers, Catharine, Skowronski, Danuta M, Rose, Caren, Serres, Gaston De, Winter, Anne-Luise, Dickinson, James A, Jassem, Agatha, Gubbay, Jonathan B, Fonseca, Kevin, Drews, Steven J, Charest, Hugues, Martineau, Christine, Petric, Martin, Krajden, Mel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6143149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30263903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy211
_version_ 1783355928911806464
author Chambers, Catharine
Skowronski, Danuta M
Rose, Caren
Serres, Gaston De
Winter, Anne-Luise
Dickinson, James A
Jassem, Agatha
Gubbay, Jonathan B
Fonseca, Kevin
Drews, Steven J
Charest, Hugues
Martineau, Christine
Petric, Martin
Krajden, Mel
author_facet Chambers, Catharine
Skowronski, Danuta M
Rose, Caren
Serres, Gaston De
Winter, Anne-Luise
Dickinson, James A
Jassem, Agatha
Gubbay, Jonathan B
Fonseca, Kevin
Drews, Steven J
Charest, Hugues
Martineau, Christine
Petric, Martin
Krajden, Mel
author_sort Chambers, Catharine
collection PubMed
description We investigated sex as a potential modifier of influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) between 2010–2011 and 2016–2017 in Canada. Overall VE was 49% (95% confidence interval [CI], 43% to 55%) for females and 38% (95% CI, 28% to 46%) for males (absolute difference [AD], 11%; P = .03). Sex differences were greatest for influenza A(H3N2) (AD, 17%; P = .07) and B(Victoria) (AD, 20%; P = .08) compared with A(H1N1)pdm09 (AD, 10%; P = .19) or B(Yamagata) (AD, –3%; P = .68). They were also more pronounced in older adults ≥50 years (AD, 19%; P = .03) compared with those <20 years (AD, 4%; P = .74) or 20–49 years (AD, –1%; P = .90) but with variation by subtype/lineage. More definitive investigations of VE by sex and age are warranted to elucidate these potential interactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6143149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61431492018-09-27 Should Sex Be Considered an Effect Modifier in the Evaluation of Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness? Chambers, Catharine Skowronski, Danuta M Rose, Caren Serres, Gaston De Winter, Anne-Luise Dickinson, James A Jassem, Agatha Gubbay, Jonathan B Fonseca, Kevin Drews, Steven J Charest, Hugues Martineau, Christine Petric, Martin Krajden, Mel Open Forum Infect Dis Brief Report We investigated sex as a potential modifier of influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) between 2010–2011 and 2016–2017 in Canada. Overall VE was 49% (95% confidence interval [CI], 43% to 55%) for females and 38% (95% CI, 28% to 46%) for males (absolute difference [AD], 11%; P = .03). Sex differences were greatest for influenza A(H3N2) (AD, 17%; P = .07) and B(Victoria) (AD, 20%; P = .08) compared with A(H1N1)pdm09 (AD, 10%; P = .19) or B(Yamagata) (AD, –3%; P = .68). They were also more pronounced in older adults ≥50 years (AD, 19%; P = .03) compared with those <20 years (AD, 4%; P = .74) or 20–49 years (AD, –1%; P = .90) but with variation by subtype/lineage. More definitive investigations of VE by sex and age are warranted to elucidate these potential interactions. Oxford University Press 2018-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6143149/ /pubmed/30263903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy211 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Brief Report
Chambers, Catharine
Skowronski, Danuta M
Rose, Caren
Serres, Gaston De
Winter, Anne-Luise
Dickinson, James A
Jassem, Agatha
Gubbay, Jonathan B
Fonseca, Kevin
Drews, Steven J
Charest, Hugues
Martineau, Christine
Petric, Martin
Krajden, Mel
Should Sex Be Considered an Effect Modifier in the Evaluation of Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness?
title Should Sex Be Considered an Effect Modifier in the Evaluation of Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness?
title_full Should Sex Be Considered an Effect Modifier in the Evaluation of Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness?
title_fullStr Should Sex Be Considered an Effect Modifier in the Evaluation of Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness?
title_full_unstemmed Should Sex Be Considered an Effect Modifier in the Evaluation of Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness?
title_short Should Sex Be Considered an Effect Modifier in the Evaluation of Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness?
title_sort should sex be considered an effect modifier in the evaluation of influenza vaccine effectiveness?
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6143149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30263903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy211
work_keys_str_mv AT chamberscatharine shouldsexbeconsideredaneffectmodifierintheevaluationofinfluenzavaccineeffectiveness
AT skowronskidanutam shouldsexbeconsideredaneffectmodifierintheevaluationofinfluenzavaccineeffectiveness
AT rosecaren shouldsexbeconsideredaneffectmodifierintheevaluationofinfluenzavaccineeffectiveness
AT serresgastonde shouldsexbeconsideredaneffectmodifierintheevaluationofinfluenzavaccineeffectiveness
AT winteranneluise shouldsexbeconsideredaneffectmodifierintheevaluationofinfluenzavaccineeffectiveness
AT dickinsonjamesa shouldsexbeconsideredaneffectmodifierintheevaluationofinfluenzavaccineeffectiveness
AT jassemagatha shouldsexbeconsideredaneffectmodifierintheevaluationofinfluenzavaccineeffectiveness
AT gubbayjonathanb shouldsexbeconsideredaneffectmodifierintheevaluationofinfluenzavaccineeffectiveness
AT fonsecakevin shouldsexbeconsideredaneffectmodifierintheevaluationofinfluenzavaccineeffectiveness
AT drewsstevenj shouldsexbeconsideredaneffectmodifierintheevaluationofinfluenzavaccineeffectiveness
AT charesthugues shouldsexbeconsideredaneffectmodifierintheevaluationofinfluenzavaccineeffectiveness
AT martineauchristine shouldsexbeconsideredaneffectmodifierintheevaluationofinfluenzavaccineeffectiveness
AT petricmartin shouldsexbeconsideredaneffectmodifierintheevaluationofinfluenzavaccineeffectiveness
AT krajdenmel shouldsexbeconsideredaneffectmodifierintheevaluationofinfluenzavaccineeffectiveness