Cargando…
An evaluation of the error and uncertainty in epibenthos cover estimates from AUV images collected with an efficient, spatially-balanced design
Efficient monitoring of organisms is at the foundation of protected area and biodiversity management. Such monitoring programs are based on a systematically selected set of survey locations that, while able to track trends at those locations through time, lack inference for the overall region being...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6143229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30226871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203827 |
_version_ | 1783355941037539328 |
---|---|
author | Monk, Jacquomo Barrett, Neville S. Peel, David Lawrence, Emma Hill, Nicole A. Lucieer, Vanessa Hayes, Keith R. |
author_facet | Monk, Jacquomo Barrett, Neville S. Peel, David Lawrence, Emma Hill, Nicole A. Lucieer, Vanessa Hayes, Keith R. |
author_sort | Monk, Jacquomo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Efficient monitoring of organisms is at the foundation of protected area and biodiversity management. Such monitoring programs are based on a systematically selected set of survey locations that, while able to track trends at those locations through time, lack inference for the overall region being “monitored”. Advances in spatially-balanced sampling approaches offer alternatives but remain largely untested in marine ecosystems. This study evaluated the merit of using a two-stage, spatially-balanced survey framework, in conjunction with generalized additive models, to estimate epifauna cover at a reef-wide scale for mesophotic reefs within a large, cross-shelf marine park. Imagery acquired by an autonomous underwater vehicle was classified using a hierarchical scheme developed under the Collaborative and Automated Tools for Analysis of Marine Imagery (CATAMI). At a realistic image subsampling intensity, the two-stage, spatially-balanced framework provided accurate and precise estimates of reef-wide cover for a select number of epifaunal classes at the coarsest CATAMI levels, in particular bryozoan and porifera classes. However, at finer hierarchical levels, accuracy and/or precision of cover estimates declined, primarily because of the natural rarity of even the most common of these classes/morphospecies. Ranked predictor importance suggested that bathymetry, backscatter and derivative terrain variables calculated at their smallest analysis window scales (i.e. 81 m(2)) were generally the most important variables in the modeling of reef-wide cover. This study makes an important step in identifying the constraints and limitations that can be identified through a robust statistical approach to design and analysis. The two-stage, spatially-balanced framework has great potential for effective quantification of epifaunal cover in cross-shelf mesophotic reefs. However, greater image subsampling intensity than traditionally applied is required to ensure adequate observations for finer-level CATAMI classes and associated morphospecies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6143229 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61432292018-10-08 An evaluation of the error and uncertainty in epibenthos cover estimates from AUV images collected with an efficient, spatially-balanced design Monk, Jacquomo Barrett, Neville S. Peel, David Lawrence, Emma Hill, Nicole A. Lucieer, Vanessa Hayes, Keith R. PLoS One Research Article Efficient monitoring of organisms is at the foundation of protected area and biodiversity management. Such monitoring programs are based on a systematically selected set of survey locations that, while able to track trends at those locations through time, lack inference for the overall region being “monitored”. Advances in spatially-balanced sampling approaches offer alternatives but remain largely untested in marine ecosystems. This study evaluated the merit of using a two-stage, spatially-balanced survey framework, in conjunction with generalized additive models, to estimate epifauna cover at a reef-wide scale for mesophotic reefs within a large, cross-shelf marine park. Imagery acquired by an autonomous underwater vehicle was classified using a hierarchical scheme developed under the Collaborative and Automated Tools for Analysis of Marine Imagery (CATAMI). At a realistic image subsampling intensity, the two-stage, spatially-balanced framework provided accurate and precise estimates of reef-wide cover for a select number of epifaunal classes at the coarsest CATAMI levels, in particular bryozoan and porifera classes. However, at finer hierarchical levels, accuracy and/or precision of cover estimates declined, primarily because of the natural rarity of even the most common of these classes/morphospecies. Ranked predictor importance suggested that bathymetry, backscatter and derivative terrain variables calculated at their smallest analysis window scales (i.e. 81 m(2)) were generally the most important variables in the modeling of reef-wide cover. This study makes an important step in identifying the constraints and limitations that can be identified through a robust statistical approach to design and analysis. The two-stage, spatially-balanced framework has great potential for effective quantification of epifaunal cover in cross-shelf mesophotic reefs. However, greater image subsampling intensity than traditionally applied is required to ensure adequate observations for finer-level CATAMI classes and associated morphospecies. Public Library of Science 2018-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6143229/ /pubmed/30226871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203827 Text en © 2018 Monk et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Monk, Jacquomo Barrett, Neville S. Peel, David Lawrence, Emma Hill, Nicole A. Lucieer, Vanessa Hayes, Keith R. An evaluation of the error and uncertainty in epibenthos cover estimates from AUV images collected with an efficient, spatially-balanced design |
title | An evaluation of the error and uncertainty in epibenthos cover estimates from AUV images collected with an efficient, spatially-balanced design |
title_full | An evaluation of the error and uncertainty in epibenthos cover estimates from AUV images collected with an efficient, spatially-balanced design |
title_fullStr | An evaluation of the error and uncertainty in epibenthos cover estimates from AUV images collected with an efficient, spatially-balanced design |
title_full_unstemmed | An evaluation of the error and uncertainty in epibenthos cover estimates from AUV images collected with an efficient, spatially-balanced design |
title_short | An evaluation of the error and uncertainty in epibenthos cover estimates from AUV images collected with an efficient, spatially-balanced design |
title_sort | evaluation of the error and uncertainty in epibenthos cover estimates from auv images collected with an efficient, spatially-balanced design |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6143229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30226871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203827 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT monkjacquomo anevaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign AT barrettnevilles anevaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign AT peeldavid anevaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign AT lawrenceemma anevaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign AT hillnicolea anevaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign AT lucieervanessa anevaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign AT hayeskeithr anevaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign AT monkjacquomo evaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign AT barrettnevilles evaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign AT peeldavid evaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign AT lawrenceemma evaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign AT hillnicolea evaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign AT lucieervanessa evaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign AT hayeskeithr evaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign |