Cargando…

An evaluation of the error and uncertainty in epibenthos cover estimates from AUV images collected with an efficient, spatially-balanced design

Efficient monitoring of organisms is at the foundation of protected area and biodiversity management. Such monitoring programs are based on a systematically selected set of survey locations that, while able to track trends at those locations through time, lack inference for the overall region being...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monk, Jacquomo, Barrett, Neville S., Peel, David, Lawrence, Emma, Hill, Nicole A., Lucieer, Vanessa, Hayes, Keith R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6143229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30226871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203827
_version_ 1783355941037539328
author Monk, Jacquomo
Barrett, Neville S.
Peel, David
Lawrence, Emma
Hill, Nicole A.
Lucieer, Vanessa
Hayes, Keith R.
author_facet Monk, Jacquomo
Barrett, Neville S.
Peel, David
Lawrence, Emma
Hill, Nicole A.
Lucieer, Vanessa
Hayes, Keith R.
author_sort Monk, Jacquomo
collection PubMed
description Efficient monitoring of organisms is at the foundation of protected area and biodiversity management. Such monitoring programs are based on a systematically selected set of survey locations that, while able to track trends at those locations through time, lack inference for the overall region being “monitored”. Advances in spatially-balanced sampling approaches offer alternatives but remain largely untested in marine ecosystems. This study evaluated the merit of using a two-stage, spatially-balanced survey framework, in conjunction with generalized additive models, to estimate epifauna cover at a reef-wide scale for mesophotic reefs within a large, cross-shelf marine park. Imagery acquired by an autonomous underwater vehicle was classified using a hierarchical scheme developed under the Collaborative and Automated Tools for Analysis of Marine Imagery (CATAMI). At a realistic image subsampling intensity, the two-stage, spatially-balanced framework provided accurate and precise estimates of reef-wide cover for a select number of epifaunal classes at the coarsest CATAMI levels, in particular bryozoan and porifera classes. However, at finer hierarchical levels, accuracy and/or precision of cover estimates declined, primarily because of the natural rarity of even the most common of these classes/morphospecies. Ranked predictor importance suggested that bathymetry, backscatter and derivative terrain variables calculated at their smallest analysis window scales (i.e. 81 m(2)) were generally the most important variables in the modeling of reef-wide cover. This study makes an important step in identifying the constraints and limitations that can be identified through a robust statistical approach to design and analysis. The two-stage, spatially-balanced framework has great potential for effective quantification of epifaunal cover in cross-shelf mesophotic reefs. However, greater image subsampling intensity than traditionally applied is required to ensure adequate observations for finer-level CATAMI classes and associated morphospecies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6143229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61432292018-10-08 An evaluation of the error and uncertainty in epibenthos cover estimates from AUV images collected with an efficient, spatially-balanced design Monk, Jacquomo Barrett, Neville S. Peel, David Lawrence, Emma Hill, Nicole A. Lucieer, Vanessa Hayes, Keith R. PLoS One Research Article Efficient monitoring of organisms is at the foundation of protected area and biodiversity management. Such monitoring programs are based on a systematically selected set of survey locations that, while able to track trends at those locations through time, lack inference for the overall region being “monitored”. Advances in spatially-balanced sampling approaches offer alternatives but remain largely untested in marine ecosystems. This study evaluated the merit of using a two-stage, spatially-balanced survey framework, in conjunction with generalized additive models, to estimate epifauna cover at a reef-wide scale for mesophotic reefs within a large, cross-shelf marine park. Imagery acquired by an autonomous underwater vehicle was classified using a hierarchical scheme developed under the Collaborative and Automated Tools for Analysis of Marine Imagery (CATAMI). At a realistic image subsampling intensity, the two-stage, spatially-balanced framework provided accurate and precise estimates of reef-wide cover for a select number of epifaunal classes at the coarsest CATAMI levels, in particular bryozoan and porifera classes. However, at finer hierarchical levels, accuracy and/or precision of cover estimates declined, primarily because of the natural rarity of even the most common of these classes/morphospecies. Ranked predictor importance suggested that bathymetry, backscatter and derivative terrain variables calculated at their smallest analysis window scales (i.e. 81 m(2)) were generally the most important variables in the modeling of reef-wide cover. This study makes an important step in identifying the constraints and limitations that can be identified through a robust statistical approach to design and analysis. The two-stage, spatially-balanced framework has great potential for effective quantification of epifaunal cover in cross-shelf mesophotic reefs. However, greater image subsampling intensity than traditionally applied is required to ensure adequate observations for finer-level CATAMI classes and associated morphospecies. Public Library of Science 2018-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6143229/ /pubmed/30226871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203827 Text en © 2018 Monk et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Monk, Jacquomo
Barrett, Neville S.
Peel, David
Lawrence, Emma
Hill, Nicole A.
Lucieer, Vanessa
Hayes, Keith R.
An evaluation of the error and uncertainty in epibenthos cover estimates from AUV images collected with an efficient, spatially-balanced design
title An evaluation of the error and uncertainty in epibenthos cover estimates from AUV images collected with an efficient, spatially-balanced design
title_full An evaluation of the error and uncertainty in epibenthos cover estimates from AUV images collected with an efficient, spatially-balanced design
title_fullStr An evaluation of the error and uncertainty in epibenthos cover estimates from AUV images collected with an efficient, spatially-balanced design
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of the error and uncertainty in epibenthos cover estimates from AUV images collected with an efficient, spatially-balanced design
title_short An evaluation of the error and uncertainty in epibenthos cover estimates from AUV images collected with an efficient, spatially-balanced design
title_sort evaluation of the error and uncertainty in epibenthos cover estimates from auv images collected with an efficient, spatially-balanced design
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6143229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30226871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203827
work_keys_str_mv AT monkjacquomo anevaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign
AT barrettnevilles anevaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign
AT peeldavid anevaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign
AT lawrenceemma anevaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign
AT hillnicolea anevaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign
AT lucieervanessa anevaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign
AT hayeskeithr anevaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign
AT monkjacquomo evaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign
AT barrettnevilles evaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign
AT peeldavid evaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign
AT lawrenceemma evaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign
AT hillnicolea evaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign
AT lucieervanessa evaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign
AT hayeskeithr evaluationoftheerroranduncertaintyinepibenthoscoverestimatesfromauvimagescollectedwithanefficientspatiallybalanceddesign