Cargando…

Framework for the assessment of PEMS (Portable Emissions Measurement Systems) uncertainty

European regulation 2016/427 (the first package of the so-called Real-Driving Emissions (RDE) regulation) introduced on-road testing with Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PEMS) to complement the chassis dynamometer laboratory (Type I) test for the type approval of light-duty vehicles in the E...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giechaskiel, Barouch, Clairotte, Michael, Valverde-Morales, Victor, Bonnel, Pierre, Kregar, Zlatko, Franco, Vicente, Dilara, Panagiota
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6143386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29908456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.012
_version_ 1783355968674856960
author Giechaskiel, Barouch
Clairotte, Michael
Valverde-Morales, Victor
Bonnel, Pierre
Kregar, Zlatko
Franco, Vicente
Dilara, Panagiota
author_facet Giechaskiel, Barouch
Clairotte, Michael
Valverde-Morales, Victor
Bonnel, Pierre
Kregar, Zlatko
Franco, Vicente
Dilara, Panagiota
author_sort Giechaskiel, Barouch
collection PubMed
description European regulation 2016/427 (the first package of the so-called Real-Driving Emissions (RDE) regulation) introduced on-road testing with Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PEMS) to complement the chassis dynamometer laboratory (Type I) test for the type approval of light-duty vehicles in the European Union since September 2017. The Not-To-Exceed (NTE) limit for a pollutant is the Type I test limit multiplied by a conformity factor that includes a margin for the additional measurement uncertainty of PEMS relative to standard laboratory equipment. The variability of measured results related to RDE trip design, vehicle operating conditions, and data evaluation remain outside of the uncertainty margin. The margins have to be reviewed annually (recital 10 of regulation 2016/646). This paper lays out the framework used for the first review of the NO(x) margin, which is also applicable to future margin reviews. Based on experimental data received from the stakeholders of the RDE technical working group in 2017, two NO(x) margin scenarios of 0.24–0.43 were calculated, accounting for different assumptions of possible zero drift behaviour of the PEMS during the tests. The reduced uncertainty margin compared to the one foreseen for 2020 (0.5) reflects the technical improvement of PEMS over the past few years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6143386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61433862018-10-01 Framework for the assessment of PEMS (Portable Emissions Measurement Systems) uncertainty Giechaskiel, Barouch Clairotte, Michael Valverde-Morales, Victor Bonnel, Pierre Kregar, Zlatko Franco, Vicente Dilara, Panagiota Environ Res Article European regulation 2016/427 (the first package of the so-called Real-Driving Emissions (RDE) regulation) introduced on-road testing with Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PEMS) to complement the chassis dynamometer laboratory (Type I) test for the type approval of light-duty vehicles in the European Union since September 2017. The Not-To-Exceed (NTE) limit for a pollutant is the Type I test limit multiplied by a conformity factor that includes a margin for the additional measurement uncertainty of PEMS relative to standard laboratory equipment. The variability of measured results related to RDE trip design, vehicle operating conditions, and data evaluation remain outside of the uncertainty margin. The margins have to be reviewed annually (recital 10 of regulation 2016/646). This paper lays out the framework used for the first review of the NO(x) margin, which is also applicable to future margin reviews. Based on experimental data received from the stakeholders of the RDE technical working group in 2017, two NO(x) margin scenarios of 0.24–0.43 were calculated, accounting for different assumptions of possible zero drift behaviour of the PEMS during the tests. The reduced uncertainty margin compared to the one foreseen for 2020 (0.5) reflects the technical improvement of PEMS over the past few years. Elsevier 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6143386/ /pubmed/29908456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.012 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Giechaskiel, Barouch
Clairotte, Michael
Valverde-Morales, Victor
Bonnel, Pierre
Kregar, Zlatko
Franco, Vicente
Dilara, Panagiota
Framework for the assessment of PEMS (Portable Emissions Measurement Systems) uncertainty
title Framework for the assessment of PEMS (Portable Emissions Measurement Systems) uncertainty
title_full Framework for the assessment of PEMS (Portable Emissions Measurement Systems) uncertainty
title_fullStr Framework for the assessment of PEMS (Portable Emissions Measurement Systems) uncertainty
title_full_unstemmed Framework for the assessment of PEMS (Portable Emissions Measurement Systems) uncertainty
title_short Framework for the assessment of PEMS (Portable Emissions Measurement Systems) uncertainty
title_sort framework for the assessment of pems (portable emissions measurement systems) uncertainty
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6143386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29908456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.012
work_keys_str_mv AT giechaskielbarouch frameworkfortheassessmentofpemsportableemissionsmeasurementsystemsuncertainty
AT clairottemichael frameworkfortheassessmentofpemsportableemissionsmeasurementsystemsuncertainty
AT valverdemoralesvictor frameworkfortheassessmentofpemsportableemissionsmeasurementsystemsuncertainty
AT bonnelpierre frameworkfortheassessmentofpemsportableemissionsmeasurementsystemsuncertainty
AT kregarzlatko frameworkfortheassessmentofpemsportableemissionsmeasurementsystemsuncertainty
AT francovicente frameworkfortheassessmentofpemsportableemissionsmeasurementsystemsuncertainty
AT dilarapanagiota frameworkfortheassessmentofpemsportableemissionsmeasurementsystemsuncertainty