Cargando…

Clinical Implication and Risk Factors for Malignancy of Atypical Gastric Gland during Forceps Biopsy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although forceps biopsy is performed for suspicious gastric tumors during endoscopy, it is difficult to determine treatment strategies for atypical gastric glands due to uncertainty of the diagnosis. The aim of this study was to investigate clinical implications and risk factors for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Min Seong, Kim, Sang Gyun, Chung, Hyunsoo, Kim, Jung, Hong, Hyoungju, Lee, Hee Jong, Kim, Hyun Ju, Kim, Min A, Kim, Woo Ho, Jung, Hyun Chae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial Office of Gut and Liver 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6143445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29938460
http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl18006
_version_ 1783355971588849664
author Kim, Min Seong
Kim, Sang Gyun
Chung, Hyunsoo
Kim, Jung
Hong, Hyoungju
Lee, Hee Jong
Kim, Hyun Ju
Kim, Min A
Kim, Woo Ho
Jung, Hyun Chae
author_facet Kim, Min Seong
Kim, Sang Gyun
Chung, Hyunsoo
Kim, Jung
Hong, Hyoungju
Lee, Hee Jong
Kim, Hyun Ju
Kim, Min A
Kim, Woo Ho
Jung, Hyun Chae
author_sort Kim, Min Seong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although forceps biopsy is performed for suspicious gastric tumors during endoscopy, it is difficult to determine treatment strategies for atypical gastric glands due to uncertainty of the diagnosis. The aim of this study was to investigate clinical implications and risk factors for predicting malignancy in atypical gastric glands during forceps biopsy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 252 patients with a diagnosis of atypical gastric gland during forceps biopsy. Predictors of malignancy were analyzed using initial endoscopic findings and clinical data. RESULTS: The final diagnosis for 252 consecutive patients was gastric cancer in 189 (75%), adenoma in 26 (10.3%), and gastritis in 37 (14.7%). In the multivariate analysis, lesion sizes of more than 10 mm (odds ratio [OR], 3.021; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.480 to 6.165; p=0.002), depressed morphology (OR, 3.181; 95% CI, 1.579 to 6.406, p=0.001), and surface nodularity (OR, 3.432; 95% CI, 1.667 to 7.064, p=0.001) were significant risk factors for malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: Further evaluation and treatment should be considered for atypical gastric gland during forceps biopsy if there is a large-sized (>10 mm) lesion, depressed morphology, or surface nodularity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6143445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Editorial Office of Gut and Liver
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61434452018-09-25 Clinical Implication and Risk Factors for Malignancy of Atypical Gastric Gland during Forceps Biopsy Kim, Min Seong Kim, Sang Gyun Chung, Hyunsoo Kim, Jung Hong, Hyoungju Lee, Hee Jong Kim, Hyun Ju Kim, Min A Kim, Woo Ho Jung, Hyun Chae Gut Liver Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although forceps biopsy is performed for suspicious gastric tumors during endoscopy, it is difficult to determine treatment strategies for atypical gastric glands due to uncertainty of the diagnosis. The aim of this study was to investigate clinical implications and risk factors for predicting malignancy in atypical gastric glands during forceps biopsy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 252 patients with a diagnosis of atypical gastric gland during forceps biopsy. Predictors of malignancy were analyzed using initial endoscopic findings and clinical data. RESULTS: The final diagnosis for 252 consecutive patients was gastric cancer in 189 (75%), adenoma in 26 (10.3%), and gastritis in 37 (14.7%). In the multivariate analysis, lesion sizes of more than 10 mm (odds ratio [OR], 3.021; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.480 to 6.165; p=0.002), depressed morphology (OR, 3.181; 95% CI, 1.579 to 6.406, p=0.001), and surface nodularity (OR, 3.432; 95% CI, 1.667 to 7.064, p=0.001) were significant risk factors for malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: Further evaluation and treatment should be considered for atypical gastric gland during forceps biopsy if there is a large-sized (>10 mm) lesion, depressed morphology, or surface nodularity. Editorial Office of Gut and Liver 2018-09 2018-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6143445/ /pubmed/29938460 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl18006 Text en Copyright © 2018 by The Korean Society of Gastroenterology, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Korean Association the Study of Intestinal Diseases, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, and Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Min Seong
Kim, Sang Gyun
Chung, Hyunsoo
Kim, Jung
Hong, Hyoungju
Lee, Hee Jong
Kim, Hyun Ju
Kim, Min A
Kim, Woo Ho
Jung, Hyun Chae
Clinical Implication and Risk Factors for Malignancy of Atypical Gastric Gland during Forceps Biopsy
title Clinical Implication and Risk Factors for Malignancy of Atypical Gastric Gland during Forceps Biopsy
title_full Clinical Implication and Risk Factors for Malignancy of Atypical Gastric Gland during Forceps Biopsy
title_fullStr Clinical Implication and Risk Factors for Malignancy of Atypical Gastric Gland during Forceps Biopsy
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Implication and Risk Factors for Malignancy of Atypical Gastric Gland during Forceps Biopsy
title_short Clinical Implication and Risk Factors for Malignancy of Atypical Gastric Gland during Forceps Biopsy
title_sort clinical implication and risk factors for malignancy of atypical gastric gland during forceps biopsy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6143445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29938460
http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl18006
work_keys_str_mv AT kimminseong clinicalimplicationandriskfactorsformalignancyofatypicalgastricglandduringforcepsbiopsy
AT kimsanggyun clinicalimplicationandriskfactorsformalignancyofatypicalgastricglandduringforcepsbiopsy
AT chunghyunsoo clinicalimplicationandriskfactorsformalignancyofatypicalgastricglandduringforcepsbiopsy
AT kimjung clinicalimplicationandriskfactorsformalignancyofatypicalgastricglandduringforcepsbiopsy
AT honghyoungju clinicalimplicationandriskfactorsformalignancyofatypicalgastricglandduringforcepsbiopsy
AT leeheejong clinicalimplicationandriskfactorsformalignancyofatypicalgastricglandduringforcepsbiopsy
AT kimhyunju clinicalimplicationandriskfactorsformalignancyofatypicalgastricglandduringforcepsbiopsy
AT kimmina clinicalimplicationandriskfactorsformalignancyofatypicalgastricglandduringforcepsbiopsy
AT kimwooho clinicalimplicationandriskfactorsformalignancyofatypicalgastricglandduringforcepsbiopsy
AT junghyunchae clinicalimplicationandriskfactorsformalignancyofatypicalgastricglandduringforcepsbiopsy