Cargando…

Smoothness Metrics in Complex Movement Tasks

Smoothness is a main characteristic of goal-directed human movements. The suitability of approaches quantifying movement smoothness is dependent on the analyzed signal's structure. Recently, activities of daily living (ADL) received strong interest in research on aging and neurorehabilitation....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gulde, Philipp, Hermsdörfer, Joachim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6143727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30258393
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00615
_version_ 1783356026974633984
author Gulde, Philipp
Hermsdörfer, Joachim
author_facet Gulde, Philipp
Hermsdörfer, Joachim
author_sort Gulde, Philipp
collection PubMed
description Smoothness is a main characteristic of goal-directed human movements. The suitability of approaches quantifying movement smoothness is dependent on the analyzed signal's structure. Recently, activities of daily living (ADL) received strong interest in research on aging and neurorehabilitation. Such tasks have complex signal structures and kinematic parameters need to be adapted. In the present study we examined four different approaches to quantify movement smoothness in ADL. We tested the appropriateness of these approaches, namely the number of velocity peaks per meter (NoP), the spectral arc length (SAL), the speed metric (SM) and the log dimensionless jerk (LDJ), by comparing movement signals from eight healthy elderly (67.1a ± 7.1a) with eight healthy young (26.9a ± 2.1a) participants performing an activity of daily living (making a cup of tea). All approaches were able to identify group differences in smoothness (Cohen's d NoP = 2.53, SAL = 1.95, SM = 1.69, LDJ = 4.19), three revealed high to very high sensitivity (z-scores: NoP = 1.96 ± 0.55, SAL = 1.60 ± 0.64, SM = 3.41 ± 3.03, LDJ = 5.28 ± 1.52), three showed low within-group variance (NoP = 0.72, SAL = 0.60, SM = 0.11, LDJ = 0.71), two showed strong correlations between the first and the second half of the task execution (intra-trial R(2)s: NoP = 0.22 n.s., SAL = 0.33, SM = 0.36, LDJ = 0.91), and one was independent of other kinematic parameters (SM), while three showed strong models of multiple linear regression (R(2)s: NoP = 0.61, SAL = 0.48, LDJ = 0.70). Based on our results we make suggestion toward use examined smoothness measures. In total the log dimensionless jerk proved to be the most appropriate in ADL, as long as trial durations are controlled.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6143727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61437272018-09-26 Smoothness Metrics in Complex Movement Tasks Gulde, Philipp Hermsdörfer, Joachim Front Neurol Neurology Smoothness is a main characteristic of goal-directed human movements. The suitability of approaches quantifying movement smoothness is dependent on the analyzed signal's structure. Recently, activities of daily living (ADL) received strong interest in research on aging and neurorehabilitation. Such tasks have complex signal structures and kinematic parameters need to be adapted. In the present study we examined four different approaches to quantify movement smoothness in ADL. We tested the appropriateness of these approaches, namely the number of velocity peaks per meter (NoP), the spectral arc length (SAL), the speed metric (SM) and the log dimensionless jerk (LDJ), by comparing movement signals from eight healthy elderly (67.1a ± 7.1a) with eight healthy young (26.9a ± 2.1a) participants performing an activity of daily living (making a cup of tea). All approaches were able to identify group differences in smoothness (Cohen's d NoP = 2.53, SAL = 1.95, SM = 1.69, LDJ = 4.19), three revealed high to very high sensitivity (z-scores: NoP = 1.96 ± 0.55, SAL = 1.60 ± 0.64, SM = 3.41 ± 3.03, LDJ = 5.28 ± 1.52), three showed low within-group variance (NoP = 0.72, SAL = 0.60, SM = 0.11, LDJ = 0.71), two showed strong correlations between the first and the second half of the task execution (intra-trial R(2)s: NoP = 0.22 n.s., SAL = 0.33, SM = 0.36, LDJ = 0.91), and one was independent of other kinematic parameters (SM), while three showed strong models of multiple linear regression (R(2)s: NoP = 0.61, SAL = 0.48, LDJ = 0.70). Based on our results we make suggestion toward use examined smoothness measures. In total the log dimensionless jerk proved to be the most appropriate in ADL, as long as trial durations are controlled. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6143727/ /pubmed/30258393 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00615 Text en Copyright © 2018 Gulde and Hermsdörfer. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Gulde, Philipp
Hermsdörfer, Joachim
Smoothness Metrics in Complex Movement Tasks
title Smoothness Metrics in Complex Movement Tasks
title_full Smoothness Metrics in Complex Movement Tasks
title_fullStr Smoothness Metrics in Complex Movement Tasks
title_full_unstemmed Smoothness Metrics in Complex Movement Tasks
title_short Smoothness Metrics in Complex Movement Tasks
title_sort smoothness metrics in complex movement tasks
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6143727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30258393
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00615
work_keys_str_mv AT guldephilipp smoothnessmetricsincomplexmovementtasks
AT hermsdorferjoachim smoothnessmetricsincomplexmovementtasks