Cargando…

Gesture and Sign: Cataclysmic Break or Dynamic Relations?

The goal of the article is to offer a framework against which relations between gesture and sign can be systematically explored beyond the current literature. It does so by (a) reconstructing the history of the discussion in the field of gesture studies, focusing on three leading positions (Kendon,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Müller, Cornelia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6143805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30258377
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651
_version_ 1783356044094734336
author Müller, Cornelia
author_facet Müller, Cornelia
author_sort Müller, Cornelia
collection PubMed
description The goal of the article is to offer a framework against which relations between gesture and sign can be systematically explored beyond the current literature. It does so by (a) reconstructing the history of the discussion in the field of gesture studies, focusing on three leading positions (Kendon, McNeill, and Goldin-Meadow); and (b) by formulating a position to illustrate how this can be achieved. The paper concludes by emphasizing the need for systematic cross-linguistic research on multimodal use of language in its signed and spoken forms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6143805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61438052018-09-26 Gesture and Sign: Cataclysmic Break or Dynamic Relations? Müller, Cornelia Front Psychol Psychology The goal of the article is to offer a framework against which relations between gesture and sign can be systematically explored beyond the current literature. It does so by (a) reconstructing the history of the discussion in the field of gesture studies, focusing on three leading positions (Kendon, McNeill, and Goldin-Meadow); and (b) by formulating a position to illustrate how this can be achieved. The paper concludes by emphasizing the need for systematic cross-linguistic research on multimodal use of language in its signed and spoken forms. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6143805/ /pubmed/30258377 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651 Text en Copyright © 2018 Müller. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Müller, Cornelia
Gesture and Sign: Cataclysmic Break or Dynamic Relations?
title Gesture and Sign: Cataclysmic Break or Dynamic Relations?
title_full Gesture and Sign: Cataclysmic Break or Dynamic Relations?
title_fullStr Gesture and Sign: Cataclysmic Break or Dynamic Relations?
title_full_unstemmed Gesture and Sign: Cataclysmic Break or Dynamic Relations?
title_short Gesture and Sign: Cataclysmic Break or Dynamic Relations?
title_sort gesture and sign: cataclysmic break or dynamic relations?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6143805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30258377
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651
work_keys_str_mv AT mullercornelia gestureandsigncataclysmicbreakordynamicrelations