Cargando…

What are the requirements for developing a successful national registry of auditory implants? A qualitative study

OBJECTIVES: Hearing loss is an area of unmet need, and industry is targeting this field with a growing range of surgically implanted hearing devices. Currently, there is no comprehensive UK registry capturing data on these devices; in its absence, it is difficult to monitor clinical and cost-effecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mandavia, Rishi, Knight, Alec, Carter, Alexander W, Toal, Connor, Mossialos, Elias, Littlejohns, Peter, Schilder, Anne GM
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6144326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30209155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021720
_version_ 1783356091133853696
author Mandavia, Rishi
Knight, Alec
Carter, Alexander W
Toal, Connor
Mossialos, Elias
Littlejohns, Peter
Schilder, Anne GM
author_facet Mandavia, Rishi
Knight, Alec
Carter, Alexander W
Toal, Connor
Mossialos, Elias
Littlejohns, Peter
Schilder, Anne GM
author_sort Mandavia, Rishi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Hearing loss is an area of unmet need, and industry is targeting this field with a growing range of surgically implanted hearing devices. Currently, there is no comprehensive UK registry capturing data on these devices; in its absence, it is difficult to monitor clinical and cost-effectiveness and develop national policy. Recognising that developing such a registry faces considerable challenges, it is important to gather opinions from stakeholders and patients. This paper builds on our systematic review on surgical registry development and aims to identify the specific requirements for developing a successful national registry of auditory implants. DESIGN: Qualitative study. PARTICIPANTS: Data were collected in two ways: (1) semistructured interviews with UK professional stakeholders; and (2) focus groups with patients with hearing loss. The interview and focus group schedules were informed by our systematic review on registry development. Data were analysed using directed content analysis. Judges mapped the themes obtained against a conceptual framework developed from our systematic review on registry development. The conceptual framework consisted of five categories for successful registry development: (1) planning, (2) registry governance, (3) registry dataset, (4) anticipating challenges, (5) implementing solutions. RESULTS: Twenty-seven themes emerged from 40 semistructured interviews with professional stakeholders and 18 themes emerged from three patient focus groups. The most important factor for registry success was high rates of data completion. Benefits of developing a successful registry of auditory implants include: strengthening the evidence base and regulation of auditory implants, driving quality and safety improvements, increased transparency, facilitating patient decision-making and informing policy and guidelines development. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies the requirements for developing a successful national registry of auditory implants, benefiting from the involvement of numerous professional stakeholder groups and patients with hearing loss. Our approach may be used internationally to inform successful registry development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6144326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61443262018-09-21 What are the requirements for developing a successful national registry of auditory implants? A qualitative study Mandavia, Rishi Knight, Alec Carter, Alexander W Toal, Connor Mossialos, Elias Littlejohns, Peter Schilder, Anne GM BMJ Open Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology OBJECTIVES: Hearing loss is an area of unmet need, and industry is targeting this field with a growing range of surgically implanted hearing devices. Currently, there is no comprehensive UK registry capturing data on these devices; in its absence, it is difficult to monitor clinical and cost-effectiveness and develop national policy. Recognising that developing such a registry faces considerable challenges, it is important to gather opinions from stakeholders and patients. This paper builds on our systematic review on surgical registry development and aims to identify the specific requirements for developing a successful national registry of auditory implants. DESIGN: Qualitative study. PARTICIPANTS: Data were collected in two ways: (1) semistructured interviews with UK professional stakeholders; and (2) focus groups with patients with hearing loss. The interview and focus group schedules were informed by our systematic review on registry development. Data were analysed using directed content analysis. Judges mapped the themes obtained against a conceptual framework developed from our systematic review on registry development. The conceptual framework consisted of five categories for successful registry development: (1) planning, (2) registry governance, (3) registry dataset, (4) anticipating challenges, (5) implementing solutions. RESULTS: Twenty-seven themes emerged from 40 semistructured interviews with professional stakeholders and 18 themes emerged from three patient focus groups. The most important factor for registry success was high rates of data completion. Benefits of developing a successful registry of auditory implants include: strengthening the evidence base and regulation of auditory implants, driving quality and safety improvements, increased transparency, facilitating patient decision-making and informing policy and guidelines development. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies the requirements for developing a successful national registry of auditory implants, benefiting from the involvement of numerous professional stakeholder groups and patients with hearing loss. Our approach may be used internationally to inform successful registry development. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6144326/ /pubmed/30209155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021720 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology
Mandavia, Rishi
Knight, Alec
Carter, Alexander W
Toal, Connor
Mossialos, Elias
Littlejohns, Peter
Schilder, Anne GM
What are the requirements for developing a successful national registry of auditory implants? A qualitative study
title What are the requirements for developing a successful national registry of auditory implants? A qualitative study
title_full What are the requirements for developing a successful national registry of auditory implants? A qualitative study
title_fullStr What are the requirements for developing a successful national registry of auditory implants? A qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed What are the requirements for developing a successful national registry of auditory implants? A qualitative study
title_short What are the requirements for developing a successful national registry of auditory implants? A qualitative study
title_sort what are the requirements for developing a successful national registry of auditory implants? a qualitative study
topic Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6144326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30209155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021720
work_keys_str_mv AT mandaviarishi whataretherequirementsfordevelopingasuccessfulnationalregistryofauditoryimplantsaqualitativestudy
AT knightalec whataretherequirementsfordevelopingasuccessfulnationalregistryofauditoryimplantsaqualitativestudy
AT carteralexanderw whataretherequirementsfordevelopingasuccessfulnationalregistryofauditoryimplantsaqualitativestudy
AT toalconnor whataretherequirementsfordevelopingasuccessfulnationalregistryofauditoryimplantsaqualitativestudy
AT mossialoselias whataretherequirementsfordevelopingasuccessfulnationalregistryofauditoryimplantsaqualitativestudy
AT littlejohnspeter whataretherequirementsfordevelopingasuccessfulnationalregistryofauditoryimplantsaqualitativestudy
AT schilderannegm whataretherequirementsfordevelopingasuccessfulnationalregistryofauditoryimplantsaqualitativestudy