Cargando…

Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of consenting processes and their effects on patient decision-making when undergoing spinal injections: the Risks In Spinal Consenting for Surgery (RISCS) trial

INTRODUCTION: There are major differences between legal and medical approaches to informed consent. Medically, consent is obtained prospectively for an intended procedure, to inform the patient of choices, risks and benefits, and to manage expectations. Legally, consent is reviewed retrospectively,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fletcher, James W A, Khan, Mohsin, Thorpe, Paul L P J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6144337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30206091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023426
_version_ 1783356093455400960
author Fletcher, James W A
Khan, Mohsin
Thorpe, Paul L P J
author_facet Fletcher, James W A
Khan, Mohsin
Thorpe, Paul L P J
author_sort Fletcher, James W A
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There are major differences between legal and medical approaches to informed consent. Medically, consent is obtained prospectively for an intended procedure, to inform the patient of choices, risks and benefits, and to manage expectations. Legally, consent is reviewed retrospectively, usually following unmet expectations and/or the occurrence of complications. Recent legal cases relating to clinical negligence define the establishment of causation and breach of duty related to informed consent. However, there is no prospective evidence to validate the current judicial perspectives on causation and thus clinical negligence. The aim of this randomised controlled trial (RCT) is to investigate whether variations in consenting processes for the same procedure lead to changes in patient decision-making related to consent for that procedure. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Risks In Spinal Consenting for Surgery trial is a single-centre, non-inferiority RCT, where 220 patients, aged over 18 years, receiving an elective, day case spinal injection, will be randomised to either a ‘legally styled’ consent form with 55 risks identified in the world literature, or a ‘medically styled’ consent form with the 13 serious or most common risks usually quoted by reference to specialist society guidelines. Following explanation of the medical reasons for considering an injection therapy and consent to the trial, participants will be randomly allocated to one of two groups (1:1). The patients are then given the opportunity to discuss any concerns relating to the procedure and/or risks with a single specialist practitioner. The primary outcome will be rates of consent withdrawal due to the risks explained. Secondary outcomes include scores from the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Visual Analogue Scale, EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Results will be presented in peer-reviewed journals and at international conferences. This study is approved by the Health Research Authority: REC 16/SC/0510. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN67513618; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6144337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61443372018-09-21 Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of consenting processes and their effects on patient decision-making when undergoing spinal injections: the Risks In Spinal Consenting for Surgery (RISCS) trial Fletcher, James W A Khan, Mohsin Thorpe, Paul L P J BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: There are major differences between legal and medical approaches to informed consent. Medically, consent is obtained prospectively for an intended procedure, to inform the patient of choices, risks and benefits, and to manage expectations. Legally, consent is reviewed retrospectively, usually following unmet expectations and/or the occurrence of complications. Recent legal cases relating to clinical negligence define the establishment of causation and breach of duty related to informed consent. However, there is no prospective evidence to validate the current judicial perspectives on causation and thus clinical negligence. The aim of this randomised controlled trial (RCT) is to investigate whether variations in consenting processes for the same procedure lead to changes in patient decision-making related to consent for that procedure. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Risks In Spinal Consenting for Surgery trial is a single-centre, non-inferiority RCT, where 220 patients, aged over 18 years, receiving an elective, day case spinal injection, will be randomised to either a ‘legally styled’ consent form with 55 risks identified in the world literature, or a ‘medically styled’ consent form with the 13 serious or most common risks usually quoted by reference to specialist society guidelines. Following explanation of the medical reasons for considering an injection therapy and consent to the trial, participants will be randomly allocated to one of two groups (1:1). The patients are then given the opportunity to discuss any concerns relating to the procedure and/or risks with a single specialist practitioner. The primary outcome will be rates of consent withdrawal due to the risks explained. Secondary outcomes include scores from the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Visual Analogue Scale, EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Results will be presented in peer-reviewed journals and at international conferences. This study is approved by the Health Research Authority: REC 16/SC/0510. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN67513618; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6144337/ /pubmed/30206091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023426 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Surgery
Fletcher, James W A
Khan, Mohsin
Thorpe, Paul L P J
Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of consenting processes and their effects on patient decision-making when undergoing spinal injections: the Risks In Spinal Consenting for Surgery (RISCS) trial
title Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of consenting processes and their effects on patient decision-making when undergoing spinal injections: the Risks In Spinal Consenting for Surgery (RISCS) trial
title_full Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of consenting processes and their effects on patient decision-making when undergoing spinal injections: the Risks In Spinal Consenting for Surgery (RISCS) trial
title_fullStr Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of consenting processes and their effects on patient decision-making when undergoing spinal injections: the Risks In Spinal Consenting for Surgery (RISCS) trial
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of consenting processes and their effects on patient decision-making when undergoing spinal injections: the Risks In Spinal Consenting for Surgery (RISCS) trial
title_short Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of consenting processes and their effects on patient decision-making when undergoing spinal injections: the Risks In Spinal Consenting for Surgery (RISCS) trial
title_sort study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of consenting processes and their effects on patient decision-making when undergoing spinal injections: the risks in spinal consenting for surgery (riscs) trial
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6144337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30206091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023426
work_keys_str_mv AT fletcherjameswa studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofconsentingprocessesandtheireffectsonpatientdecisionmakingwhenundergoingspinalinjectionstherisksinspinalconsentingforsurgeryriscstrial
AT khanmohsin studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofconsentingprocessesandtheireffectsonpatientdecisionmakingwhenundergoingspinalinjectionstherisksinspinalconsentingforsurgeryriscstrial
AT thorpepaullpj studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofconsentingprocessesandtheireffectsonpatientdecisionmakingwhenundergoingspinalinjectionstherisksinspinalconsentingforsurgeryriscstrial