Cargando…

Essential fracture and orthopaedic equipment lists in low resource settings: consensus derived by survey of experts in Africa

INTRODUCTION: Low/middle-income countries (LMICs) have a growing need for trauma and orthopaedic (T&O) surgical interventions but lack surgical resources. Part of this is due to the high amount of road traffic accidents in LMICs. We aimed to develop recommendations for an essential list of equip...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chan, Yuen, Banza, Leonard, Martin Jr, Claude, Harrison, William J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6144338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30224399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023473
_version_ 1783356093694476288
author Chan, Yuen
Banza, Leonard
Martin Jr, Claude
Harrison, William J
author_facet Chan, Yuen
Banza, Leonard
Martin Jr, Claude
Harrison, William J
author_sort Chan, Yuen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Low/middle-income countries (LMICs) have a growing need for trauma and orthopaedic (T&O) surgical interventions but lack surgical resources. Part of this is due to the high amount of road traffic accidents in LMICs. We aimed to develop recommendations for an essential list of equipment for three different levels of care providers. METHODS: The Delphi method was used to achieve consensus on essential and desirable T&O equipment for LMICs. Twenty experts with T&O experience from LMICs underwent two rounds of questionnaires. Feedback was given after each round of questionnaires. The first round of questionnaire consisted of 45 items graded on a Likert scale with the second round consisting of 50 items. We used an electronic questionnaire to collect our data for three different levels of care: non-operative-based provider, specialist provider with operative fracture care and tertiary provider with operative fracture care and orthopaedics. RESULTS: After two rounds of questionnaires, recommendations for each level of care in LMICs included 4 essential equipment items for non-operative-based providers; 27 essential equipment items for specialist providers with operative fracture care and 46 essential equipment items for tertiary providers with operative fracture care and orthopaedic care. CONCLUSION: These recommendations can facilitate in planning of appropriate equipment required in an institution which in turn has the potential to improve the capacity and quality of T&O care in LMICs. The essential equipment lists provided here can help direct where funding for equipment should be targeted. Our recommendations can help with planning and organising national T&O care in LMICs to achieve appropriate capacity at all relevant levels of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6144338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61443382018-09-21 Essential fracture and orthopaedic equipment lists in low resource settings: consensus derived by survey of experts in Africa Chan, Yuen Banza, Leonard Martin Jr, Claude Harrison, William J BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Low/middle-income countries (LMICs) have a growing need for trauma and orthopaedic (T&O) surgical interventions but lack surgical resources. Part of this is due to the high amount of road traffic accidents in LMICs. We aimed to develop recommendations for an essential list of equipment for three different levels of care providers. METHODS: The Delphi method was used to achieve consensus on essential and desirable T&O equipment for LMICs. Twenty experts with T&O experience from LMICs underwent two rounds of questionnaires. Feedback was given after each round of questionnaires. The first round of questionnaire consisted of 45 items graded on a Likert scale with the second round consisting of 50 items. We used an electronic questionnaire to collect our data for three different levels of care: non-operative-based provider, specialist provider with operative fracture care and tertiary provider with operative fracture care and orthopaedics. RESULTS: After two rounds of questionnaires, recommendations for each level of care in LMICs included 4 essential equipment items for non-operative-based providers; 27 essential equipment items for specialist providers with operative fracture care and 46 essential equipment items for tertiary providers with operative fracture care and orthopaedic care. CONCLUSION: These recommendations can facilitate in planning of appropriate equipment required in an institution which in turn has the potential to improve the capacity and quality of T&O care in LMICs. The essential equipment lists provided here can help direct where funding for equipment should be targeted. Our recommendations can help with planning and organising national T&O care in LMICs to achieve appropriate capacity at all relevant levels of care. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6144338/ /pubmed/30224399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023473 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Surgery
Chan, Yuen
Banza, Leonard
Martin Jr, Claude
Harrison, William J
Essential fracture and orthopaedic equipment lists in low resource settings: consensus derived by survey of experts in Africa
title Essential fracture and orthopaedic equipment lists in low resource settings: consensus derived by survey of experts in Africa
title_full Essential fracture and orthopaedic equipment lists in low resource settings: consensus derived by survey of experts in Africa
title_fullStr Essential fracture and orthopaedic equipment lists in low resource settings: consensus derived by survey of experts in Africa
title_full_unstemmed Essential fracture and orthopaedic equipment lists in low resource settings: consensus derived by survey of experts in Africa
title_short Essential fracture and orthopaedic equipment lists in low resource settings: consensus derived by survey of experts in Africa
title_sort essential fracture and orthopaedic equipment lists in low resource settings: consensus derived by survey of experts in africa
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6144338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30224399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023473
work_keys_str_mv AT chanyuen essentialfractureandorthopaedicequipmentlistsinlowresourcesettingsconsensusderivedbysurveyofexpertsinafrica
AT banzaleonard essentialfractureandorthopaedicequipmentlistsinlowresourcesettingsconsensusderivedbysurveyofexpertsinafrica
AT martinjrclaude essentialfractureandorthopaedicequipmentlistsinlowresourcesettingsconsensusderivedbysurveyofexpertsinafrica
AT harrisonwilliamj essentialfractureandorthopaedicequipmentlistsinlowresourcesettingsconsensusderivedbysurveyofexpertsinafrica