Cargando…

Presenting a strong and united front to tobacco industry interference : a content analysis of Australian newspaper coverage of tobacco plain packaging 2008–2014

OBJECTIVES: In 2012, Australia was the first country in the world to introduce plain or standardised tobacco packaging, coupled with larger graphic health warnings. This policy was fiercely opposed by industry. Media coverage can be an influential contributor to public debate, and both public health...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Caroline Louise, Brownbill, Aimee Lee, Dono, Joanne, Ettridge, Kerry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6144411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30224400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023485
_version_ 1783356100871979008
author Miller, Caroline Louise
Brownbill, Aimee Lee
Dono, Joanne
Ettridge, Kerry
author_facet Miller, Caroline Louise
Brownbill, Aimee Lee
Dono, Joanne
Ettridge, Kerry
author_sort Miller, Caroline Louise
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In 2012, Australia was the first country in the world to introduce plain or standardised tobacco packaging, coupled with larger graphic health warnings. This policy was fiercely opposed by industry. Media coverage can be an influential contributor to public debate, and both public health advocates and industry sought media coverage for their positions. The aim of this study was to measure the print media coverage of Australian’s plain packaging laws, from inception to roll-out, in major Australian newspapers. METHODS: This study monitored mainstream Australian print media (17 newspapers) coverage of the plain packaging policy debate and implementation, over a 7-year period from January 2008 to December 2014. Articles (n=701) were coded for article type, opinion slant and topic(s). DESIGN: Content analysis. RESULTS: Coverage of plain packaging was low during preimplementation phase (2008–2009), increasing sharply in the lead into legislative processes and diminished substantially after implementation. Articles covered policy rationale, policy progress and industry arguments. Of the news articles, 96% were neutrally framed. Of the editorials, 55% were supportive, 28% were opposing, 12% were neutral and 5% were mixed. CONCLUSIONS: Protracted political debate, reflected in the media, led to an implementation delay of plain packaging. While Australian media provided comprehensive coverage of industry arguments, news coverage was largely neutral, whereas editorials were mostly supportive or neutral of the policy. Countries seeking to implement plain packaging of tobacco should not be deterred by the volume of news coverage, but should actively promote the evidence for plain packaging in the media to counteract the arguments of the tobacco industry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6144411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61444112018-09-21 Presenting a strong and united front to tobacco industry interference : a content analysis of Australian newspaper coverage of tobacco plain packaging 2008–2014 Miller, Caroline Louise Brownbill, Aimee Lee Dono, Joanne Ettridge, Kerry BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: In 2012, Australia was the first country in the world to introduce plain or standardised tobacco packaging, coupled with larger graphic health warnings. This policy was fiercely opposed by industry. Media coverage can be an influential contributor to public debate, and both public health advocates and industry sought media coverage for their positions. The aim of this study was to measure the print media coverage of Australian’s plain packaging laws, from inception to roll-out, in major Australian newspapers. METHODS: This study monitored mainstream Australian print media (17 newspapers) coverage of the plain packaging policy debate and implementation, over a 7-year period from January 2008 to December 2014. Articles (n=701) were coded for article type, opinion slant and topic(s). DESIGN: Content analysis. RESULTS: Coverage of plain packaging was low during preimplementation phase (2008–2009), increasing sharply in the lead into legislative processes and diminished substantially after implementation. Articles covered policy rationale, policy progress and industry arguments. Of the news articles, 96% were neutrally framed. Of the editorials, 55% were supportive, 28% were opposing, 12% were neutral and 5% were mixed. CONCLUSIONS: Protracted political debate, reflected in the media, led to an implementation delay of plain packaging. While Australian media provided comprehensive coverage of industry arguments, news coverage was largely neutral, whereas editorials were mostly supportive or neutral of the policy. Countries seeking to implement plain packaging of tobacco should not be deterred by the volume of news coverage, but should actively promote the evidence for plain packaging in the media to counteract the arguments of the tobacco industry. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6144411/ /pubmed/30224400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023485 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Miller, Caroline Louise
Brownbill, Aimee Lee
Dono, Joanne
Ettridge, Kerry
Presenting a strong and united front to tobacco industry interference : a content analysis of Australian newspaper coverage of tobacco plain packaging 2008–2014
title Presenting a strong and united front to tobacco industry interference : a content analysis of Australian newspaper coverage of tobacco plain packaging 2008–2014
title_full Presenting a strong and united front to tobacco industry interference : a content analysis of Australian newspaper coverage of tobacco plain packaging 2008–2014
title_fullStr Presenting a strong and united front to tobacco industry interference : a content analysis of Australian newspaper coverage of tobacco plain packaging 2008–2014
title_full_unstemmed Presenting a strong and united front to tobacco industry interference : a content analysis of Australian newspaper coverage of tobacco plain packaging 2008–2014
title_short Presenting a strong and united front to tobacco industry interference : a content analysis of Australian newspaper coverage of tobacco plain packaging 2008–2014
title_sort presenting a strong and united front to tobacco industry interference : a content analysis of australian newspaper coverage of tobacco plain packaging 2008–2014
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6144411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30224400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023485
work_keys_str_mv AT millercarolinelouise presentingastrongandunitedfronttotobaccoindustryinterferenceacontentanalysisofaustraliannewspapercoverageoftobaccoplainpackaging20082014
AT brownbillaimeelee presentingastrongandunitedfronttotobaccoindustryinterferenceacontentanalysisofaustraliannewspapercoverageoftobaccoplainpackaging20082014
AT donojoanne presentingastrongandunitedfronttotobaccoindustryinterferenceacontentanalysisofaustraliannewspapercoverageoftobaccoplainpackaging20082014
AT ettridgekerry presentingastrongandunitedfronttotobaccoindustryinterferenceacontentanalysisofaustraliannewspapercoverageoftobaccoplainpackaging20082014